I am just curious on your alls opinion on the father being charged with murder? Isn’t what he did AT WORST accessory or something? I guess they will say he clearly knew and provided the gun intending the murders occur. I guess I am just curious why he’s charged with murder when the 14 year old is the one who committed murder. Is there actual precedent for this or are they warping the law the fit their agenda? What is next, you loan out a car to someone and they run a crowd over now your a murderer? LOL!
Edit: my main concern in all of this is just the dangerous legal precedent. Who decided the gun was bought for the kid, why did the FBI not do anything, etc
Will the doctor who prescribed the SSRI's be charged? Or the pharmaceutical company which manufactured the SSRI's be charged, too?
All SSRI's should be banned and the pharma companies that produced them should be liquidated with the executives and useful idiots that dreamed of the SSRI's convicted of murder and put to death by firing squad right in front of the White House.
What is next, you loan out a car to someone and they run a crowd over now your a murderer? LOL!
I'd assume if I gave my son the keys to my car and he was underage, then yes, I would be charged
So then what if they take the keys without permission, how can this possibly even be proved? Did the dad clearly say and make an announcement THIS GUN IS FOR MY SON TO USE! It’s a very dangerous legal precedent Even if between the two they discussed this and what not how could this be proven? If he would’ve stated this at the gun store when purchasing said firearm that would’ve been stopped.
I guess they would have to investigate how he got my keys-through the trial. And if I were a betting man, I would be coerced into pleading out to manslaughter or something.
Not saying it's right, just giving you the legalities as they currently stand.
You’re correct , they will say trial found guilty 18 years or take plea deal of guilty serve 2 to 5 . Happens every day to many innocent people , I know two who had no choice but to take the plea, because they had priors and the chance of being found quilty was real, so they did the two years .
If the person is a minor, the parent is responsible? But then again they are charging the shooter as an adult- nothing makes sense about all these mass shootings except the FBI is playing us for fools and the DOJ thinks we will give up our guns…
More people wake up daily! :D
It might be a problem for the FBI that the kid is still alive.
It appears that AFTER they were visited by the FBI regarding the boys online threats, the father bought the boy an AR. No details on if it was locked away, but the fact that the kid used it suggests it was not. The father should have known his kid was wacko as normal kids don’t get visits from law enforcement regarding online threats...
I agree but what if the dad bought the AR for himself and had it secured? A kid could easily get it. The difference is the dad may have committed ZERO crimes (I think the dad is stupid mind you. But not automatically a murderer) too bad the FBI did absolutely nothing if it was an illegal act committed by the kid. And if they didn’t do anything, clearly the threats were not deemed authentic or illegal no?
It could not have been secured if the boy had access to it unless there is a hole cut in dad’s safe. A trigger lock or some other sissy cable lock toy is NOT secured.
I think it was because he got a gun for a minor.
Did he like announce this somewhere? Like who makes the determination this occurred? Did the dad post on Twitter “bought my son a gun!”. Did the kid tell everyone that even if it could be totally fabricated, etc. We need to punish the INDIVIDUAL, and for crimes like these it should be inhumane so that the behavior STOPS
Bottom Line: We don't know what's going on and what happened and we won't ever because the FBI is involved.
If you study the original MK-Ultra stuff you'll learn that it involves powerful continued pressure to psychologically control the behavior of an individual, very different from mass brainwashing that people here attach to the label. The purpose of the MK-Ultra method is precisely to avoid accountability for the ones pulling the strings. It's a sick practice, but Q told us many times how sick and evil these people are.
The existence of these killers has intimidated many people, keeping them under threat to enforce the cabal system.
If the father knowingly spent years preparing his son to be used as a weapon and then intentionally started the chain of events to make it happen, then the charges would actually make sense. That said, you'd have to read the charges and evidence to determine if that's what they are charging and whether it's valid.
Alternatively you could view it as a signal to anyone participating in the MK-Ultra program that the jig is up and they will now be held accountable.
The charges will be dropped against the father once they convince the family to not mention that the child was brainwashed by the FBI. Since the child was not shot and killed, they have a loose end, so they need leverage.
Read Chaos by Tom O'Neal and you'll see the evil these folks are capable of. If they were involved with Manson and his family, which they were, why wouldn't they be involved with these shooter families? Maybe not all, but why did they cremate Crooks? The parents were behavioral scientists and didn't notice a problem? Was he adopted and trained from birth? Probably wouldn't want to do it to.your own kid.
Look at that a school SRO is who stopped the shooter. Who said guns in school are a bad thing! Especially when its the good guy with a gun!
https://www.police1.com/school-resource-officer/sros-who-stopped-ga-school-shooter-had-extensive-backgrounds-training-in-school-threat-response
Interesting that the FBeye admits that they had "contact" with the kid regarding his on-line comments. How many visits were there, one, two, three or more? And wasn't it said that the kid was training in the same shooting range as them? Were they investigating him or grooming him? Was the father aware and thereby a possible liability for the agency?
The father should not be charged period. How does the state know that he bought a gun for his son? Answer, the state doesn't unless they have found footage of said son opening up an AK-47 or other gun as a birthday or Christmas gift. There is a 99.9% chance the gun was stolen.
Its NOT right!!!....he may not be totally innocent of everything but to charge him with murder is bullshit...he did NOT kill anyone. But knowing what agency is in charge and what we know about their practices, I can't say I am at all surprised.
This is my main point; Charge him with something that at least makes sense, accessory, or some crime of enabling but now 2 people are charged with murder?
I don’t think the father should be charged. he’s not responsible for his son, taking a gun from their home and using it to shoot other people. With your logic, we’re getting into red flag laws, and those are equally as sinister as gun control.
Why should the father be charged? if that’s the case, then every black kid out there who kills their parents should be charged as well! What about all the parents of illegal aliens who commit crimes, should they be charged to? It’s a slippery slope when you want to charge someone else, for the actions of another.
This is exactly what they did to that Durov Telegram dude in France. they’re trying to blame him for the crimes of somebody that used his platform.
It’s communism and socialism!