9/11: Donald Trump claims ‘bombs were planted’ in World Trade Center BEFORE planes hit.
Since the terror attack, there have been multiple, unproven, claims the buildings were toppled by bombs planted at their foundation – and it seems Donald Trump agrees. I remember listening to the radio on 9/11 on my way to work and hearing Trump saying he thought it was bombs.
In an interview on the day of the abhorrent attacks, the billionaire real estate magnate was asked to give his expertise on the structure of the building.
Describing the North tower of the WTC as a “very, very strong building”, he suggested that twin bombs could have caused it to collapse.
Speaking about the tower's demise, he said: “It wasn’t architectural defect.
“How could a plane, even a 767 or 747 or whatever it might have been; how could it possibly go through that steel?
“I happen to think that they had not only a plane, but they had bombs – bombs that exploded simultaneously.
Trump’s comments were made before an investigation by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) ruled the towers went down after fires were sparked by jet fuel after American Airlines Flights 11 and 175 smashed into the structures.
And John Skilling, the chief structural engineer of the World Trade Center, even admitted in 1993 – eight years before the disaster – they were made to specifically withstand the force of a jet hitting them. In an interview with the Seattle Times he said: "Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed [but] the building structure would still be there." He then commented that in his view, the only thing that could bring them down would be explosives of some sort.
Eyewitness accounts describing the aftermath of the attacks supports the theory explosives were planted inside the towers.
. . . Not to mention the reports and photos of mystery workers who were working late night / Early morning for several weeks before the demolition event.
I remember video from police body cam in the lobby before the collapse. Smoke filled lobby, granite facade knocked off the walls, wittnesses saying there were explosions in basement levels. People walking out of basement that were burned.
The official story was jet fuel went down the elevator shaft and exploded. The problem with that story was the elevator shafts only traveled 30 floors. To get to upper floors you had to ride 3 different elevators. There was no shaft that traveled the full length of the building. So, the plane didn't cause the basement explosions, what did?
I remember a video of firemen, who were covered in dust, talking about the collapse. One of them said he saw rapid fire series of explosions. He was using his hand pointing to different floors as he rapidly said "boom, boom, boom, boom" Are those the silent explosions you are refering to?
You talked about wasting your time. You are still wasting your time because we do not take anything a handshake shill says seriously.
It was two fission/fusion devices below the bottom basement levels in both buildings that vaporized the steel and the concrete causing the central core to collapse. There’s pictures of melted bedrock as the they were filling these voids with concrete. Jet fuel doesn’t melt bed rock. There’s a German study that showed how this happened but has mostly disappeared from the internet.
Like u/jhartz39 said, but I know your type - pretending you're objective when you're really a propagandist.
They like to say "there were no explosions heard" when WTC1 and WTC2 fell, yet first responders consistently testified to explosions being heard.
They also like to gaslight first responders testimony of what they heard, when these first responders have heard many explosions in their careers.
Their cognitive dissonance gets in the way: acknowledging the explosives would suggest that the collapses were not solely caused by the impacts of the planes and the resulting fires as they were told to propagandize.
Or maybe they're part of a broader effort to control the narrative, discredit dissenting voices, and maintain a specific version of events that aligns with the MSM/NIST explanation of the 9/11 attacks.
Yes, I agree, I have seen it many times. I have often wondered who is paying these shills to infiltrate online conversations to confirm the MSM/NIST narrative while they belittle people looking for the truth.
Could it be members of the media who were accomplices in covering up the crime? Is it people who planned the attack? Perhaps Israeli art students? Perhaps it is Dick or Liz Cheyne themselves, lol.
It has been 20 years since it happened and they are still scared the truth will come out
They are fighting a battle they will surely lose, u/eagledriver said the real story is coming out and I agree. With sites like GAW, Twitter, Truth Social the truth is no longer censored. I try to spread truth nuggets in MSM comment threads and it is immediately removed. Irregardless, we are having considerable success in spreading the truth.
Aprox 15 years ago I was talking to my brother about all the circumstancial evidence surrounding 9/11, he thought I was crazy to believe it was a false flag event. Today, he is telling me things he learned about 9/11, the truth has arrived, it just took more convincing.
My entire family worked building that city and all of them cannot handle or field questions about this event. They ALL shut down in an unusual TDS kind of way. Simple questions about steel being mangled in a certain way or how does fire melt steel, or you name it. They are all PTSD. The same way a TDS person is shot out. They are trauma walking that shows you how the CIA, whoever got to their brain and its over. Now, carry on. TV , in my opinion is the culprit. Its a weapon. If not in the patent, its shown before Trump and now we have TDS where they got the populous clearly GONE. So, lets call it a day. They are like people that had a bad trip and AIN'T coming back. So, keep that in mind, they are not NORMIES, they are shot.
MY BEST TAKEAWAY, NORMIES ARE DONE FOR, ITS OVER. GAME TIME.
I remember the expediency of the clean up and destroying of any kind of evidence that might be found. It was lucky they found all the passports of the terrorist. That was awesome!
If it was explosive force of floors landing on each other, how come bone fragments were found on the roofs of nearby buildings, as if explosions tore apart bodies as it blasted them out the window, laterally?
It doesn't make sense that bodies would have been squished by the floor and it lifted up to eject the bone fragments laterally, no one can explain that.
Thinking out loud🤔...
Could Bldg #7 have been "Command Central" for all the nefarious events of that day and the "plug was pulled" after the last provocateur left the bldg later that day?...Did all that steel "cleaned" from the site actually get shipped to China or was it "deep-sixed" like Osamas body double?...The "Truth" is still out there because there were simply too many people(orgs. and depts.) involved for it not to be...it took months to "clean up" but people saw what they saw 👀
perfectly in range of getting debris rained on it imo, including large beams. if you watch any video of the collapse that shit was being thrown all over the place
2 downvotes but nobody bothering to refute this. and you call yourselves "greatawakening" lmao. how are you ever gonna wake the fuck up if the only permissible viewpoint is that 100% of the theories are correct and proving otherwise is not permissible. pathetic
these buildings are LITERALLY next to ground zero:
Refute the lateral explosions in this section then: https://youtu.be/Ddz2mw2vaEg?t=1509 . Don't worry, this chapter is 140 seconds (2 minutes and 20 seconds).
If you can do that, try refute eyewitness reports of explosions: https://youtu.be/Ddz2mw2vaEg?t=1371 (This section is about 2 minutes and 20 seconds too)
i'm not refuting any explosions. i know for a fact these were controlled demolitions. but these beams ended up in adjacent buildings due to the debris of the collapse itself, not from being violently ejected as the direct result of an explosion. it's clear to me that the force of the plummetting upper section forced the outer shell to fall outwards in all directions. it can't fall inwards, and it can't freefall directly beneath itself either. this can be clearly percieved by just looking at the collapse, and the fact that a lot of it was shrouded in thick clouds of smoke and dust doesn't automatically leave the door open for inviting further complexity.
Explosions generally violently eject things within their blast radius, including beams.
it's clear to me that the force of the plummetting upper section - to this, you need to look at how WTC1/2 were built. They were a complete network of steel, and the only way floors 80 and below were compromised from doing their job of holding up all the floors above it, were as you noted.. with demolitions. Which are explosives, which eject things from its blast radius, including beams, laterally.
This was reported at the time. There were vids of the beams flying. It all disappeared in a few days. Then they blamed it on the pancake effect.
This, a lot even back then was barely covered, not just 911.
i agree, i remember seeing something like this in the early days.
9/11: Donald Trump claims ‘bombs were planted’ in World Trade Center BEFORE planes hit.
Since the terror attack, there have been multiple, unproven, claims the buildings were toppled by bombs planted at their foundation – and it seems Donald Trump agrees. I remember listening to the radio on 9/11 on my way to work and hearing Trump saying he thought it was bombs.
In an interview on the day of the abhorrent attacks, the billionaire real estate magnate was asked to give his expertise on the structure of the building. Describing the North tower of the WTC as a “very, very strong building”, he suggested that twin bombs could have caused it to collapse.
Speaking about the tower's demise, he said: “It wasn’t architectural defect. “How could a plane, even a 767 or 747 or whatever it might have been; how could it possibly go through that steel?
“I happen to think that they had not only a plane, but they had bombs – bombs that exploded simultaneously.
Trump’s comments were made before an investigation by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) ruled the towers went down after fires were sparked by jet fuel after American Airlines Flights 11 and 175 smashed into the structures.
And John Skilling, the chief structural engineer of the World Trade Center, even admitted in 1993 – eight years before the disaster – they were made to specifically withstand the force of a jet hitting them. In an interview with the Seattle Times he said: "Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed [but] the building structure would still be there." He then commented that in his view, the only thing that could bring them down would be explosives of some sort.
Eyewitness accounts describing the aftermath of the attacks supports the theory explosives were planted inside the towers.
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/world-news/9-11-donald-trump-twin-16892937
Many eyewitnesses to 9/11 died under mysterious circumstances afterwards.
Noteworthy: https://imageproxy.ifunny.co/crop:x-20,resize:640x,quality:90x75/images/a4b2178677caac0facfe4832413bdefc2237dacbf644718a739049cdf75e9a93_1.jpg
. . . Not to mention the reports and photos of mystery workers who were working late night / Early morning for several weeks before the demolition event.
The lateral ejections on WTC1 & WTC2 were so obviously explosions
And some of the beams just vaporized in midair.
I remember video from police body cam in the lobby before the collapse. Smoke filled lobby, granite facade knocked off the walls, wittnesses saying there were explosions in basement levels. People walking out of basement that were burned.
The official story was jet fuel went down the elevator shaft and exploded. The problem with that story was the elevator shafts only traveled 30 floors. To get to upper floors you had to ride 3 different elevators. There was no shaft that traveled the full length of the building. So, the plane didn't cause the basement explosions, what did?
I remember a video of firemen, who were covered in dust, talking about the collapse. One of them said he saw rapid fire series of explosions. He was using his hand pointing to different floors as he rapidly said "boom, boom, boom, boom" Are those the silent explosions you are refering to?
You talked about wasting your time. You are still wasting your time because we do not take anything a handshake shill says seriously.
5 Q drops also say "boom boom boom boom"
Have those saved out to a folder labeld: "9-11"...
NOTE: I was sent to New York on 9-11 by the military and believe me, the scene looked like something that was NOT shown on TV!!!!!!!!
I do believe that the NEWSIES WERE TOLD to do CERTAIN STORIES on 9-11 and guess what...the REAL STORY IS COMING OUT NOW...
When something this cataclysmic happens it is ONLY a matter of time that the TRUTH wins out!!!
It was two fission/fusion devices below the bottom basement levels in both buildings that vaporized the steel and the concrete causing the central core to collapse. There’s pictures of melted bedrock as the they were filling these voids with concrete. Jet fuel doesn’t melt bed rock. There’s a German study that showed how this happened but has mostly disappeared from the internet.
Nicely done !
Like u/jhartz39 said, but I know your type - pretending you're objective when you're really a propagandist.
They like to say "there were no explosions heard" when WTC1 and WTC2 fell, yet first responders consistently testified to explosions being heard.
They also like to gaslight first responders testimony of what they heard, when these first responders have heard many explosions in their careers.
Their cognitive dissonance gets in the way: acknowledging the explosives would suggest that the collapses were not solely caused by the impacts of the planes and the resulting fires as they were told to propagandize.
Or maybe they're part of a broader effort to control the narrative, discredit dissenting voices, and maintain a specific version of events that aligns with the MSM/NIST explanation of the 9/11 attacks.
Yes, I agree, I have seen it many times. I have often wondered who is paying these shills to infiltrate online conversations to confirm the MSM/NIST narrative while they belittle people looking for the truth.
Could it be members of the media who were accomplices in covering up the crime? Is it people who planned the attack? Perhaps Israeli art students? Perhaps it is Dick or Liz Cheyne themselves, lol.
It has been 20 years since it happened and they are still scared the truth will come out
They are fighting a battle they will surely lose, u/eagledriver said the real story is coming out and I agree. With sites like GAW, Twitter, Truth Social the truth is no longer censored. I try to spread truth nuggets in MSM comment threads and it is immediately removed. Irregardless, we are having considerable success in spreading the truth.
Aprox 15 years ago I was talking to my brother about all the circumstancial evidence surrounding 9/11, he thought I was crazy to believe it was a false flag event. Today, he is telling me things he learned about 9/11, the truth has arrived, it just took more convincing.
I've never heard of this before either.
My entire family worked building that city and all of them cannot handle or field questions about this event. They ALL shut down in an unusual TDS kind of way. Simple questions about steel being mangled in a certain way or how does fire melt steel, or you name it. They are all PTSD. The same way a TDS person is shot out. They are trauma walking that shows you how the CIA, whoever got to their brain and its over. Now, carry on. TV , in my opinion is the culprit. Its a weapon. If not in the patent, its shown before Trump and now we have TDS where they got the populous clearly GONE. So, lets call it a day. They are like people that had a bad trip and AIN'T coming back. So, keep that in mind, they are not NORMIES, they are shot.
MY BEST TAKEAWAY, NORMIES ARE DONE FOR, ITS OVER. GAME TIME.
It takes an immense amount of energy to do this.
Richard Gage always has new angles! Way ahead of the evidence game.
I remember the expediency of the clean up and destroying of any kind of evidence that might be found. It was lucky they found all the passports of the terrorist. That was awesome!
Another aspect not widely reported was that there were numerous human remains collected off the roofs of neighboring buildings...several stories high.
Correct.
If it was explosive force of floors landing on each other, how come bone fragments were found on the roofs of nearby buildings, as if explosions tore apart bodies as it blasted them out the window, laterally?
It doesn't make sense that bodies would have been squished by the floor and it lifted up to eject the bone fragments laterally, no one can explain that.
Can we get the torches already…
Two words INSIDE JOB
Thinking out loud🤔... Could Bldg #7 have been "Command Central" for all the nefarious events of that day and the "plug was pulled" after the last provocateur left the bldg later that day?...Did all that steel "cleaned" from the site actually get shipped to China or was it "deep-sixed" like Osamas body double?...The "Truth" is still out there because there were simply too many people(orgs. and depts.) involved for it not to be...it took months to "clean up" but people saw what they saw 👀
Melted car tires a city block away … hmmm
Where did the towers go? Evidence of directed free energy technology on 9/11 By Judy Wood,B.S.,M.S.,Ph.D
Excellent textbook with all sorts of analysis.
of all the weird shit that happened that day, this isn't one of them.
here's another angle
https://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/docs/zomb/speared_bldg.jpg
perfectly in range of getting debris rained on it imo, including large beams. if you watch any video of the collapse that shit was being thrown all over the place
2 downvotes but nobody bothering to refute this. and you call yourselves "greatawakening" lmao. how are you ever gonna wake the fuck up if the only permissible viewpoint is that 100% of the theories are correct and proving otherwise is not permissible. pathetic
these buildings are LITERALLY next to ground zero:
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7125825,-74.0140052,3a,75y,263.27h,139.18t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1snHgpTNE_anw4QsLbzVwAdQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
this corresponds to the north tower. this was the collapse radius that we all saw:
https://imgsnotigram.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2023/09/20230911105048062-0-2097473.jpg
it peeled like a fucking banana, of course beams are gonna end up in adjacent buildings
took me 30 seconds to find this
Refute the lateral explosions in this section then: https://youtu.be/Ddz2mw2vaEg?t=1509 . Don't worry, this chapter is 140 seconds (2 minutes and 20 seconds).
If you can do that, try refute eyewitness reports of explosions: https://youtu.be/Ddz2mw2vaEg?t=1371 (This section is about 2 minutes and 20 seconds too)
i'm not refuting any explosions. i know for a fact these were controlled demolitions. but these beams ended up in adjacent buildings due to the debris of the collapse itself, not from being violently ejected as the direct result of an explosion. it's clear to me that the force of the plummetting upper section forced the outer shell to fall outwards in all directions. it can't fall inwards, and it can't freefall directly beneath itself either. this can be clearly percieved by just looking at the collapse, and the fact that a lot of it was shrouded in thick clouds of smoke and dust doesn't automatically leave the door open for inviting further complexity.
Explosions generally violently eject things within their blast radius, including beams.
it's clear to me that the force of the plummetting upper section - to this, you need to look at how WTC1/2 were built. They were a complete network of steel, and the only way floors 80 and below were compromised from doing their job of holding up all the floors above it, were as you noted.. with demolitions. Which are explosives, which eject things from its blast radius, including beams, laterally.