DeSantis signs bill ending permanent alimony
(www.wpbf.com)
Comments (40)
sorted by:
About time. Now get rid of forced child support.
IDK, you spill the seed, you ought to pay for the watering of the flower, huh?
If that was only how it worked. Instead, flower be damned, you wind up paying for hair, food, vehicle, recreation, phone and better housing then you could afford for yourself for the ex while she uses her own money on vacations and accessories, because she'll be damned if she gets a job and loses any piece of that child support. all while you get less then half of the rights to the child, while still being expected to pay for the childs needs as an aside to the support order.
No bitter experiences here..nope..not bitter at all...
Just need to see the receipts of what that water bill actually cost -- don't need to be paying for the neighbor's water bill, too.
The women don't have to provide proof of their bills in this state, though.
Yeah, that's a problem, but ...
"Fraud vitiates every thing." -- US v. Throckmorton
You have no clue what youre talking about. Cs is corrupt to the core. As is divorce court. Men are walking atm’s and thats it.
Bingo.
Especially in this state.
I don't think he should be subjected to entrapment. So not if he didn't want a child to begin with. This is nothing more than slavery. There's too many women gaming the system having kids they don't want for child support. This encourages them to have more kids - their kids wind up being criminals and threats to society. The government doesn't belong in marriage or our personal lives. Period. The only way this ends is to stop child support and stop welfare. People (women especially) need to be held accountable for their poor choices. Tax payers should have to fund the lifestyles of people who don't want to work. The only way to solve this is to get rid of welfare and child support.
I think, according to Democrats, pregnancy is a woman's health issue, like a cold, the flu, or a mild fever, so they don't know how women get pregnant and they want the woman to be able to abort the baby whenever they don't want it. So apparently, the women (mainly democrat women) don't know what causes pregnancy-so they won't be able to stop it; just make the male in the equation responsible for the baby.
How can this be expected? They don't even know what a "woman" is.
Sad, but true!
They should force the payee to document where that money went. I paid child support and maybe 10% went to the kid. The rest went to beer, cigarettes, drugs, etc..
The system is clearly biased towards women and in particular morally bankrupt women.
BTW, Rick W. on Youtube teaches how to deal with that issue.
My dad didn’t pay one dime in child support for me. I attended college one class at a time. Why should any parent get by without financially supporting their child?
It's not the govt's decision that's why. Marriage is church-related not a govt contract. If one parent doesn't want to support the child - CHOOSE BETTER.
Well, the child doesn’t have a choice.
The child doesn't have a choice in abortion either, so? The best scenario is women not have unprotected sex with stray men with no use of contraceptives and expect the public and the man who didn't ask for it - to pay for her bad choices. She chose to have sex. He didn't choose for her to get knocked up and become a parasite.
If the parents are married, there should be child support. That is not a random event.
Only if you like the govt in your personal business. It wasn't always involved in marriage and child support until it became profitable.
I like parents that support their children. My parents were too consumed by their own wants. I got to grow up in foster care because of their selfishness. If it takes the government to force parents into doing their duty, so be it.
Mary a guy. Get pregnant. Cheat on him. Divorce him. Make him pay for your debauched lifestyle.
Bingo.
Learn to code.
Can't teach an old ho new tricks.
Mgtow
Hoes mad.
It's an older story, sir, but it checks out
Like my 28 yo daughter says, "Dont out your D where it doesn't belong."
Something good finally.,
It's. About. Damn. Time.
Now I can file for divorce.
I'm not sure they eliminated alimony entirely. Just permanent alimony. Check your laws. Who knows? You may be required to pay temporary alimony or some other such garbage.
"they" wanted to make it easier and easier for marriages to break down, for couples to separate and split, and families to be fractured, all under the name of 'individual rights'. But all this did was make it easier for people to not be responsible for their commitments (marriage) and to constantly reduce the accountability.
But all this does is destroy the rights of children, who have a right to two parents working together to make things work.
I'm not talking about seriously problematic marriages, where one or two of the adults involved are chronically failing in their responsibility. Separation is sometimes necessary. But the Marxists and their sympathizers constantly drove the machine of govt and law in a way that is destructive and hostile to people actually establishing long-lasting marriages and the family environment that healthy, normal human beings benefit most from.
Govt must serve the People, not abuse them. And laws that governments make MUST uphold the well-being of the People, and should therefore promote healthy and responsible families, not make it easier for them to collapse and one or two of the spouses involved to bail ship.
Too many laws of the past 100 years have been destructive to families, where they should be uplifting and reinforcing families.
Govt inserted itself into marriage, which has nothing to do with it. Because when in doubt, they choose to enslave people - men in this case - rather than find real solutions.