If Passed by the Uniform Law Commission (Another Unconstitutional Body), the Public Health Emergency Authority Act Would Allow Governors to Become Dictators
(www.theblaze.com)
🤜 FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! 🤛
Comments (19)
sorted by:
The Constitution does not grant government the ability to suspend elections, enact Marshal Law, or suspend the Habeous Corpus.
The U.S Constitution cannot be "enforced" on American Citizens. It is enforced upon our government. It's the contract or license granting certain specific powers to government. Anything beyond those limits is usurped or stolen powers.
Freedom loving Americans should form local community militias and form regional militia networks in each state. These militias would train together on a regular basis. They would support each other to protect their communities and citizens from government tyranny, invasions, etc. This is how you protect our Constitutional Republic in the manner intended by our founding fathers.
We have to remember, and have to remind those who serve us in government that:
“Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or remove or diminish the restrictions imposed upon power granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted in a period of grave emergency. Its grants of power to the federal government and its limitations of the power of the States were determined in the light of emergency, and they are not altered by emergency.” ~ Justice Charles Evans Hughes (1862-1948) Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court Home Building & Loan Assn v. Blairsdell, 1934
The same premise applies to Constitutional Amendments. An Amendment cannot go against the original intent of the Constitution, it can only add to it in a manner consistent with the original intent at the time the Constitution was written and adopted.
There are a few paths for us to right these wrongs. One is Nullification:
Yale Law Journal Quote “The right of the jury to decide questions of law was widely recognized in the colonies. In 1771, John Adams stated unequivocally that a juror should ignore a judge’s instruction on the law if it violates fundamental principles: “It is not only ... [the juror’s] right, but his duty, in that case, to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court.” There is much evidence of the general acceptance of this principle in the period immediately after the Constitution was adopted.” ~ Yale Law Journal Note: The Changing Role of the Jury in the Nineteenth Century, Yale Law Journal 74, 174 (1964).
"No legislative act contrary to the Constitution can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy (agent) is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. It is not to be supposed that the Constitution could intend to enable the representatives of the people to substitute their will to that of their constituents. A Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges as fundamental law. If there should happen to be a irreconcilable variance between the two, the Constitution is to be preferred to the statute." - Quote by: Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804) American statesman, Secretary of the Treasury Source: Federalist Papers #78, See also Warning v. The Mayor of Savannah, 60 Georgia, P.93; First Trust Co. v. Smith, 277 SW 762, Marbury v. Madison, 2 L Ed 60; and Am.Juris. 2d Constitutional Law, section 177-178)
I would encourage you to turn this into a post. If I were a mod, this would have been stickied if it were a post.
Sticky so we can get more eyes and digs on this. Thank you Anons.
I think what needs to be investigated is the Unconstitutional "Uniform Law Commission." All we know right now is that this "Law Commission" likely exists so that it can create laws that have no hope of passing Congress.
BTW, thanks for the sticky.
The US Constitution and Bill of Rights were written for THIS exact reason. There is NO little Temporary group of COMMUNISTS in any DC Congress or State gov., or county or city officials that CAN make a law that is (treason) against the Laws that rule over the USA and NOT the UN. and WHO.
I just checked the website. Apparently this "Uniform Law Commission" is a non-profit organization that passes acts that basically tell the states what needs to be passed in any given year. They are based in Chicago and there is no congressional oversight.
"based in Chicago"....well, that explains it...thanks for sharing js!
“The only things to ever come out of Chicago are shots and plots.”
Right. The city that has 762 people murdered every year for gangs has a 'group' that advises Other states to Be like them? LMAO.
U.S. State level UN (30 for 30) bullshite.
I think you mean Agenda 2030. "30 for 30" is a ESPN documentary series.
Problem -> Reaction -> Solution
Just about every "health emergency" has been created by government in one for or another. It's high time we take "government" out of the equation.
Would allow them to become dictators????already happening for years,i live in nys
These Commies never, ever, give up, they keep pushing their agenda to overtake common sense and install a Communist government in America. This needs to stop and these Commies need to be charged, tried, and punished to fullest extent of the law.
It doesn't appear to wotk that way unless states pass laws making it so. They suggest certain laws. An awareness of the source and implications of these laws is what is needed amd electing people that won't bring their suggestions to the floor for a vote.
It is happening now
We The People: “LOL NOPE”
They are already allowed to be dictators.
Screw these traitors, Our Constitution supports freedom from tyranny