Could well be. The Biden and the warmongers have been very quiet since Trump won except for some chest beating about Trumps picks. Maybe this was their plan all along to use the rest of Biden’s time to give permission to strike within Russia. Putin is serious. If any Russian territory is hit with missiles, those Decision Making Centres will be turned to dust.
Also, everybody knows that the Nork story is pure fantasy. I have yet to see ONE photograph showing ANY Norks. For example, when Patrick Lancaster finds ONE Japanese man on the front it is a big deal. We would have seen something, instead all we saw was MSM media blowing up that story, to the point that my 80-something MIL was wide-eyed and convinced. I said No, they aren't, and she looked at me, and asked if I was FOR the Russians. Sigh. Change subject. She's got enough problems as it is.
The introduction of MLRM will increase the Zone Sanitaire width, i.e. how much of Ukraine will be liberated. So that takes time, and it will prolong the war, instead of stopping it. What is the range of ATACMS? 300km. That is the approximate width of the banana shaped territory that has decided to Join Russia. So, for context: in order to protect those citizens from incessant shelling, the opportunity for launchers to be placed near the front-line and lobbing with a range of 300km, means that the banana has to fatten and double in thickness, and it will definitely include a 300+km wide zone in the North. Prolly now it will include a fat layer on the Western Side of the Dniepr. One cannot have launchers just on the other bank TBH.
In other words, it will make things a lot worse.
Which Putin said he would do, upon the unleashing of ATACMs, and if any of those missiles hit 'deep' into Russia, the Russians will forensically 'see' American debris, and will then target the sources of those weapons.
Where are those ATACMS made, BTW? Just so we all know to expect some unexpected fire or accidental assplosion somewhere in the USA.
I don't see this story anywhere at https://en.nexta.tv/. And even if it did appear on this site, has anyone researched this site to see if it is credible into. /
Does this story appear on any other sites, NO IT DOES NOT. Why is RT not showing this story.
Thanks. I did just read about this on NYT, which does not make it truer than any other source since as we all no the NYT, WaPO, CNN etc.. are just mouth pieces of the Intel agencies.
Yes. And a big test to for the left. How many will maintain their commitment to war when Russia makes it clear they will nuke a city. This will peel off all but the 4-6%.
Idiots on X are cheering over this... SMH.
Future draft dodgers
Nothing wrong with dodging globalist wars. Dodging defending the nation, when under attack, however, is traitorous.
Is this the precipice?
Could well be. The Biden and the warmongers have been very quiet since Trump won except for some chest beating about Trumps picks. Maybe this was their plan all along to use the rest of Biden’s time to give permission to strike within Russia. Putin is serious. If any Russian territory is hit with missiles, those Decision Making Centres will be turned to dust.
Erm. That is a really bad idea.
Also, everybody knows that the Nork story is pure fantasy. I have yet to see ONE photograph showing ANY Norks. For example, when Patrick Lancaster finds ONE Japanese man on the front it is a big deal. We would have seen something, instead all we saw was MSM media blowing up that story, to the point that my 80-something MIL was wide-eyed and convinced. I said No, they aren't, and she looked at me, and asked if I was FOR the Russians. Sigh. Change subject. She's got enough problems as it is.
The introduction of MLRM will increase the Zone Sanitaire width, i.e. how much of Ukraine will be liberated. So that takes time, and it will prolong the war, instead of stopping it. What is the range of ATACMS? 300km. That is the approximate width of the banana shaped territory that has decided to Join Russia. So, for context: in order to protect those citizens from incessant shelling, the opportunity for launchers to be placed near the front-line and lobbing with a range of 300km, means that the banana has to fatten and double in thickness, and it will definitely include a 300+km wide zone in the North. Prolly now it will include a fat layer on the Western Side of the Dniepr. One cannot have launchers just on the other bank TBH.
In other words, it will make things a lot worse.
Which Putin said he would do, upon the unleashing of ATACMs, and if any of those missiles hit 'deep' into Russia, the Russians will forensically 'see' American debris, and will then target the sources of those weapons.
Where are those ATACMS made, BTW? Just so we all know to expect some unexpected fire or accidental assplosion somewhere in the USA.
I believe this is propaganda.
Why in the &**^% do people see something posted on X, and take it as gospel without lifting a finger to vet the information? https://greatawakening.win/p/17shvnzKTQ/know-your-disinfo--know-your-cli/
I don't see this story anywhere at https://en.nexta.tv/. And even if it did appear on this site, has anyone researched this site to see if it is credible into. /
Does this story appear on any other sites, NO IT DOES NOT. Why is RT not showing this story.
It's on Breitbart as of now (an hour after your comment). I didn't read much of it. "Unnamed sources" were mentioned, and the NYT and the WP.
Good advice BTW. I just assumed it was true. I never would have even gone looking if not for your comment.
Thanks. I did just read about this on NYT, which does not make it truer than any other source since as we all no the NYT, WaPO, CNN etc.. are just mouth pieces of the Intel agencies.
SCARE EVENT inbound
u/#q521
Not if Joe B signs us into another war before Trump takes office!
Not a good idea!
Yes. And a big test to for the left. How many will maintain their commitment to war when Russia makes it clear they will nuke a city. This will peel off all but the 4-6%.
Range is 190 miles. Hardly long range.