I actually believe Russia and the US are very close in power. Both understand that fact, and both will do what ever necessary to avoid war.
As the cabal that is trying to stir up WWIII between the two know, and both leadership of the countries know, war between the two destroy them both. Only the globalist cabal desires that outcome.
The two countries combined are their greatest enemies, and will destroy them. In my opinion the reason they are trying so hard to get Russia and the US into a war is that the alliance has already been made.
Why is understanding important here? Can one act acknowledging such a temporary station (comprehension) without "supporting (standing under") it?
As samurai: Mayamoto Mushashi said: to perceive the things for what they are.
This leads me to one simple yet difficult matter:
In strategy, you have effectively won when you forestall the enemy.
We have seen this practiced over these last 8 years, and we will see more of it.
Trump:
BRICS currency? Dumping USD? Fine, here is the tariff on your shit. Good luck with that.
And, we know from these past 80 years, military strength is always temporary and dependent on the moral factor of the people making up that military.
In terms of weaponry, yes, it is an awesome sight to behold.
But, when you look closely at the way things are going: why is Sirky in the Sumi region so powerful? Why is it, that Doug McGregor announced the demise of the Ukro army, yet, the resistance is, despite overpowering weaponry and manpower, stiff and resilient? Why is Russia swapping Generals?
There is more to this game than meets the eye. Certainly, the Russian army should not be underestimated. It's weaponry is awesome. But to demand that Trump "understands" that?
But I do appreciate the call to take into account, that a landwar, at the end of the logistical feasibility, especially in the face of the gargantuan resources Russia has in place, it foolish and should be stopped.
And that is a reality Trump perceives. What I notice is how Trump emphasizes the human factor, the costs in human lives, the destruction of infrastructure, the suffering of the civilian population. This is reason enough to end a war that is based on a lie and not a just one.
Russia is fighting against Ukraine + 32 NATO countries alone and winning. The USA and NATO countries couldn't even beat some goat fuckers in Afghanistan.
President Trump completely understands that Russia has a strong military. That is why the United States tried to build up its military during his first term. But the question is, "Does Joe Biden understand that Russia's armed forces are the strongest in the world?""
At the end of the day, in the long term, every war is determined by only a few things:
Number of citizens; more is better
Locally available resources
Production capacity
International support
On 1,3 and 4 the USA is far stronger than Russia and this will not change anytime soon, if ever.
What Russia has now is a weapon system that, using conventional means, can achieve effects similar to nuclear means. But note that Oreshnik is still experimental; They can't have many of these missiles yet as they are yet to be put into mass production.
Also, the Russian air force and navy are not on par with that of the USA. The Russian navy; we do not even have to talk about it. It is useless and always has been. Besides a few subs that carry the nuclear threat, there is not much to fear from the Russian navy.
The Russian air force has been developing (rebuilding rather). In Syria Russia showed it can perform sustained operations and keep up sortie numbers for reasonable lengths of time. However, in a direct confrontation with the US and NATO-allies, the Russian air force will not survive. Their newest jet is available in small numbers. In terms of strategic and tactical bombers, the numbers are very limited, as well.
However, and this is the thing, Oreshnik is capable of destroying airbases more or less by surprise. This is not a problem for the continental US, but it is for Germany, France and the UK. I have no numbers on Germany and France, but the UK only really has three airbases of note. Their main fighter, the Eurofighter is stationed at one of those bases. Numbers are fairly low as well, as many of the RAF Eurofighters are stationed abroad. Defacto, the RAF has 4 (!) Eurofighters for quick reaction to enemey airspace incursions.
Built on common sense and they don’t have AIPAC to obey.
This is a narrative. Dont fall for it.
Who cares, Russia is an imaginary enemy made up by the MIC and the DS.
Russia is not and never has been our enemy
Some expert. He must understand putin is helping.
I actually believe Russia and the US are very close in power. Both understand that fact, and both will do what ever necessary to avoid war.
As the cabal that is trying to stir up WWIII between the two know, and both leadership of the countries know, war between the two destroy them both. Only the globalist cabal desires that outcome.
The two countries combined are their greatest enemies, and will destroy them. In my opinion the reason they are trying so hard to get Russia and the US into a war is that the alliance has already been made.
Why is understanding important here? Can one act acknowledging such a temporary station (comprehension) without "supporting (standing under") it?
As samurai: Mayamoto Mushashi said: to perceive the things for what they are.
This leads me to one simple yet difficult matter:
We have seen this practiced over these last 8 years, and we will see more of it.
Trump:
And, we know from these past 80 years, military strength is always temporary and dependent on the moral factor of the people making up that military.
In terms of weaponry, yes, it is an awesome sight to behold.
But, when you look closely at the way things are going: why is Sirky in the Sumi region so powerful? Why is it, that Doug McGregor announced the demise of the Ukro army, yet, the resistance is, despite overpowering weaponry and manpower, stiff and resilient? Why is Russia swapping Generals?
There is more to this game than meets the eye. Certainly, the Russian army should not be underestimated. It's weaponry is awesome. But to demand that Trump "understands" that?
But I do appreciate the call to take into account, that a landwar, at the end of the logistical feasibility, especially in the face of the gargantuan resources Russia has in place, it foolish and should be stopped.
And that is a reality Trump perceives. What I notice is how Trump emphasizes the human factor, the costs in human lives, the destruction of infrastructure, the suffering of the civilian population. This is reason enough to end a war that is based on a lie and not a just one.
Hahahahahahahaha. Sorry, nope.
😂😂😂😂Heck, they could not take out Ukraine. Not much force would be needed.
Russia is fighting against Ukraine + 32 NATO countries alone and winning. The USA and NATO countries couldn't even beat some goat fuckers in Afghanistan.
President Trump completely understands that Russia has a strong military. That is why the United States tried to build up its military during his first term. But the question is, "Does Joe Biden understand that Russia's armed forces are the strongest in the world?""
We aren't going to war with Russia. This is moot.
At the end of the day, in the long term, every war is determined by only a few things:
On 1,3 and 4 the USA is far stronger than Russia and this will not change anytime soon, if ever.
What Russia has now is a weapon system that, using conventional means, can achieve effects similar to nuclear means. But note that Oreshnik is still experimental; They can't have many of these missiles yet as they are yet to be put into mass production.
Also, the Russian air force and navy are not on par with that of the USA. The Russian navy; we do not even have to talk about it. It is useless and always has been. Besides a few subs that carry the nuclear threat, there is not much to fear from the Russian navy.
The Russian air force has been developing (rebuilding rather). In Syria Russia showed it can perform sustained operations and keep up sortie numbers for reasonable lengths of time. However, in a direct confrontation with the US and NATO-allies, the Russian air force will not survive. Their newest jet is available in small numbers. In terms of strategic and tactical bombers, the numbers are very limited, as well.
However, and this is the thing, Oreshnik is capable of destroying airbases more or less by surprise. This is not a problem for the continental US, but it is for Germany, France and the UK. I have no numbers on Germany and France, but the UK only really has three airbases of note. Their main fighter, the Eurofighter is stationed at one of those bases. Numbers are fairly low as well, as many of the RAF Eurofighters are stationed abroad. Defacto, the RAF has 4 (!) Eurofighters for quick reaction to enemey airspace incursions.
Wait... Weren't they telling us about a year or so ago that Russia's forces were weak and ineffective?