How do you know either action is "easy"? Have you done it? I would like to know. A moving target, at night, with a poor distance estimate, against no background?
Since you don’t want to use projectiles in most cases because of the risk to people on the ground, you can use other methods. The three preferred methods are an anti drone laser, an anti drone EM weapon and a kamikazi drone. We have all three available. We have small kamikazi drones and large kamikazi drones. The latter ones can handle any speed drone. Check out Anduril Roadrunner.
You still don't get away from the liability and danger problems of a stricken drone crashing on houses, vehicles, or people. That doesn't go away by invoking fancy technology.
That is true. You can compare the drone coordinates to what is on the ground. There is software for that, but not that hard to do manually. And the odds of actually hitting a person is incredibly low.
And from where do you get "drone coordinates"? That normally takes a range measurement and azimuth and elevation angle measurements. Radars do that automatically. Not many of us have anti-aircraft radars in our pockets. How significant are the measurement errors?
These calculations are hard enough to do manually, that anti-aircraft guns were fitted with radar trackers when they were first available. Now, radar is indispensable.
So, you are willing to bet someone else's life on luck? Since you seem so comfortable with the notion of "low odds," why don't you give us all a number to go by, and tell us at what level the odds are no longer "low"?
RADA radar is made for this job. I actually ghost wrote a book on counter drone operations. I designed a protection plan for the Saudis vs the Houthis and Iranians.
I am doing it from memory, but it is generally about 1 in 10,000. In a city, it is about 1 in 500 because it is so light. Jumping out of a fighter over a city is about 1 in 100.
Well, I have to give credit where it is due. Thanks for your contribution to the problem solution. Is this sort of radar transportable, or mobile?
Does the ejection from the fighter count only the seat and pilot, or also the airframe? At Boeing, commercial practice had to establish a probability of no more than one chance in 10 million of causing a casualty from a flight. We had to live up to that for range safety requirements on the Sea Launch flights of Zenit 2 launch vehicles.
I would love to see how that would play out in a neighborhood meeting at the local high school gymnasium. "Everyone! Neighbor Jones has declared his intention to shoot down the mystery drone if it should appear again." (loud cheers) "And it is my duty to inform you that by so doing it is likely that one of you here tonight will be killed by it crashing on him." (sullen silence) "I will now call for the yeas and nays..."
I've seen and filmed one (last night). Looked like the saucer from ET (not kidding). Many people here are anti aliens and/or too into the manmade side of religion to understand how it reconciles, but there's a subset of anons who are aware of Galactic Federation and know that the government has been hiding disclosure of extra terrestrials and their involvement in our history.
These "drones" are the first step to full disclosure and ascension into 5D/Biblical Rapture, that will happen under Trump. That is why he's prophesized to be the "last president".
1 God said to Adam, "I have ordained on this earth days and years, and you and your descendants shall live and walk in them, until the days and years are fulfilled; when I shall send the Word that created you, and against which you have transgressed, the Word that made you come out of the garden, and that raised you when you were fallen.
2 Yes, the Word that will again save you when the five and a half days are fulfilled."
3 But when Adam heard these words from God, and of the great five and a half days, he did not understand the meaning of them.
4 For Adam was thinking there would be only five and a half days for him until the end of the world.
5 And Adam cried, and prayed to God to explain it to him.
6 Then God in his mercy for Adam who was made after His own image and likeness, explained to him, that these were 5,000 and 500 years; and how One would then come and save him and his descendants.
Better to bring them down intact, hacking or jamming drones IS possible and cheap FPV drones with sections of net between 2 ropes hanging below would be a viable way to tangle up props....
I want videos with detailed internals of a downed drone to make it to X and spread outside of their ability to contain.....
I revere Trump, but cannot go along with a recommendation that is all spirit and no wisdom. Who in his right mind can guarantee that a stricken drone will NOT land on house or vehicle or person? Or that a missed shot will NOT accidentally kill someone? There are lots of rules in firefights, but a big one is to be sure of who or what is in the background of your shot, where a miss or a through-penetration might hit. When you are shooting in a ballistic arc, you have no idea what this background is. In Ukraine, there is lots of "rainfall" from the anti-aircraft guns and missiles.
Especially if it lands on a house, ruins it, and kills someone. "MAGA Murder Insanity!" And you will hear about that for 78+ hours. Don't you guys ever consider consequences?
Missing a “‘t” and an “o” by my reading.
u/#q452
https://greatawakening.win/p/19A0olzluZ/
Decode
u/#catdance
u/#mikeyep
Ty - I requested a sticky for your decode post, too, Fren!
Ty
It is easy to track them to their landing location or shoot them down. But they are doing neither.
How do you know either action is "easy"? Have you done it? I would like to know. A moving target, at night, with a poor distance estimate, against no background?
Since you don’t want to use projectiles in most cases because of the risk to people on the ground, you can use other methods. The three preferred methods are an anti drone laser, an anti drone EM weapon and a kamikazi drone. We have all three available. We have small kamikazi drones and large kamikazi drones. The latter ones can handle any speed drone. Check out Anduril Roadrunner.
You still don't get away from the liability and danger problems of a stricken drone crashing on houses, vehicles, or people. That doesn't go away by invoking fancy technology.
That is true. You can compare the drone coordinates to what is on the ground. There is software for that, but not that hard to do manually. And the odds of actually hitting a person is incredibly low.
And from where do you get "drone coordinates"? That normally takes a range measurement and azimuth and elevation angle measurements. Radars do that automatically. Not many of us have anti-aircraft radars in our pockets. How significant are the measurement errors?
These calculations are hard enough to do manually, that anti-aircraft guns were fitted with radar trackers when they were first available. Now, radar is indispensable.
So, you are willing to bet someone else's life on luck? Since you seem so comfortable with the notion of "low odds," why don't you give us all a number to go by, and tell us at what level the odds are no longer "low"?
RADA radar is made for this job. I actually ghost wrote a book on counter drone operations. I designed a protection plan for the Saudis vs the Houthis and Iranians.
I am doing it from memory, but it is generally about 1 in 10,000. In a city, it is about 1 in 500 because it is so light. Jumping out of a fighter over a city is about 1 in 100.
Well, I have to give credit where it is due. Thanks for your contribution to the problem solution. Is this sort of radar transportable, or mobile?
Does the ejection from the fighter count only the seat and pilot, or also the airframe? At Boeing, commercial practice had to establish a probability of no more than one chance in 10 million of causing a casualty from a flight. We had to live up to that for range safety requirements on the Sea Launch flights of Zenit 2 launch vehicles.
I would love to see how that would play out in a neighborhood meeting at the local high school gymnasium. "Everyone! Neighbor Jones has declared his intention to shoot down the mystery drone if it should appear again." (loud cheers) "And it is my duty to inform you that by so doing it is likely that one of you here tonight will be killed by it crashing on him." (sullen silence) "I will now call for the yeas and nays..."
Gone now. Didn’t grab a screen cap to see how long it was up. 😕
https://files.catbox.moe/jftywi.png
Qagg has the deleted one timestamped 5:07. New one came in corrected at 5:37 with both typos corrected. 29 minutes.
u/#q29
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/113647906240301335
Good catch. He even posted at 5:08 to say "time between tweets"
https://greatawakening.win/p/19A0olzluZ/
Shoot misspelled
He corrected it later
I've just heard on the news. Have you guys seen any?
I've seen and filmed one (last night). Looked like the saucer from ET (not kidding). Many people here are anti aliens and/or too into the manmade side of religion to understand how it reconciles, but there's a subset of anons who are aware of Galactic Federation and know that the government has been hiding disclosure of extra terrestrials and their involvement in our history.
These "drones" are the first step to full disclosure and ascension into 5D/Biblical Rapture, that will happen under Trump. That is why he's prophesized to be the "last president".
The Elohim have officially returned.
The dying hope in me upvotes you, fren.
1 God said to Adam, "I have ordained on this earth days and years, and you and your descendants shall live and walk in them, until the days and years are fulfilled; when I shall send the Word that created you, and against which you have transgressed, the Word that made you come out of the garden, and that raised you when you were fallen.
2 Yes, the Word that will again save you when the five and a half days are fulfilled."
3 But when Adam heard these words from God, and of the great five and a half days, he did not understand the meaning of them.
4 For Adam was thinking there would be only five and a half days for him until the end of the world.
5 And Adam cried, and prayed to God to explain it to him.
6 Then God in his mercy for Adam who was made after His own image and likeness, explained to him, that these were 5,000 and 500 years; and how One would then come and save him and his descendants.
The First Book of Adam and Eve
This is fiction. One might as well quote from "Moby Dick."
Yeah it has a chapter describing the first poo. It's just good reading. 🤣💀👻
Just great. The First Poo. I will take Milton's "Paradise Lost" any day.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I would say...Looks like Open DRONE Season. Showing your Trophy Mounted on the Wall..Maybe a problem.
Your links did not work for me - try this one. https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113647906240301335
Yep, he deleted and reposted with corrections. Here’s the decode: https://greatawakening.win/p/19A0olzluZ/
Wow!!
Thank you.
Sky event?
The government as of now can't shoot them down. Why? That is a rabbit hole even Q won't touch.
Could be true disclosure.
Better to bring them down intact, hacking or jamming drones IS possible and cheap FPV drones with sections of net between 2 ropes hanging below would be a viable way to tangle up props....
I want videos with detailed internals of a downed drone to make it to X and spread outside of their ability to contain.....
...don['t]....sho[o]t. I expect anons to be smarter. Waiting for someone to shoot one down to see how much they lose criminally and/or civilly.
Proof that the MIDC has been flecing us for decades? I believe that this is a type of disclosure that will wake up the sleeping population.
I revere Trump, but cannot go along with a recommendation that is all spirit and no wisdom. Who in his right mind can guarantee that a stricken drone will NOT land on house or vehicle or person? Or that a missed shot will NOT accidentally kill someone? There are lots of rules in firefights, but a big one is to be sure of who or what is in the background of your shot, where a miss or a through-penetration might hit. When you are shooting in a ballistic arc, you have no idea what this background is. In Ukraine, there is lots of "rainfall" from the anti-aircraft guns and missiles.
He knows none of us would do that. "Shoot them down" was meant for the black hats in government - daring them to act or to explain why they won't.
All you have to do is one of the drones down, and you’ll hear about it nonstop 24 seven for 78 hours straight or more. Just one just shoot one down.
Especially if it lands on a house, ruins it, and kills someone. "MAGA Murder Insanity!" And you will hear about that for 78+ hours. Don't you guys ever consider consequences?