A quick 2 day assault and the UK can become a U.S territory. ( I am not advocting that the U.S. invade the U.K. it is just sickening the good people of England is losing theior freedons)
According to the Defense Casualty Analysis System, over 400,000 American service members died during World War II.
400,000 Americans died for Britian freedom and now they are just throwing it away.
Careful friend, you were late to the party and then only after Pearl Harbour. You didn't come to save UK but Europe. So your men didn't die for Britain's freedom, we had already been fighting for 2 years, and it was against the evil of Nazis and freedom for European countries.
How is the entire World not enraged by this British Government's ignoring Rape & Grooming of native British girls? It was only a few years ago the women of the World were enraged by the #metoo movement. Where are your angry voices now? The Internet is not telling you to be angry at this particular massive injustice?
The CIA name for their project to develop a dossier on everyone was called LifeLog. The day that it was terminated was the day that FaceBook was established to allow people to supply their own data for their own dossier. Now I know that in fact you did/do trust them. Good Luck.
"DARPA's LifeLog program was intended to create a comprehensive digital database of an individual's life experiences, tracking various aspects such as interactions, activities, and communications. The program was announced in 2003 but faced significant criticism over privacy concerns and the potential for misuse of personal data.
On February 4, 2004, the same day Facebook was launched, DARPA decided to cancel LifeLog. The cancellation has been interpreted in various ways. One significant factor was the backlash against the program, as many people were concerned about the implications of such extensive surveillance and data collection. With Facebook's launch, the landscape of social networking was evolving, and it became apparent that individuals were beginning to share much of their personal information voluntarily online, which might have made LifeLog seem redundant or overly intrusive.
The timing of the cancellation led to speculation and conspiracy theories linking the two events, suggesting that Facebook represented a more acceptable, user-driven approach to sharing personal information compared to a government-run program. However, there is no direct evidence to suggest that the launch of Facebook influenced DARPA's decision to cancel LifeLog; rather, it appears to have been a culmination of privacy concerns and changing societal attitudes towards data sharing."
"DARPA's LifeLog program was intended to create a comprehensive digital database of an individual's life experiences, tracking various aspects such as interactions, activities, and communications. The program was announced in 2003 but faced significant criticism over privacy concerns and the potential for misuse of personal data.
On February 4, 2004, the same day Facebook was launched, DARPA decided to cancel LifeLog. The cancellation has been interpreted in various ways. One significant factor was the backlash against the program, as many people were concerned about the implications of such extensive surveillance and data collection. With Facebook's launch, the landscape of social networking was evolving, and it became apparent that individuals were beginning to share much of their personal information voluntarily online, which might have made LifeLog seem redundant or overly intrusive.
The timing of the cancellation led to speculation and conspiracy theories linking the two events, suggesting that Facebook represented a more acceptable, user-driven approach to sharing personal information compared to a government-run program. However, there is no direct evidence to suggest that the launch of Facebook influenced DARPA's decision to cancel LifeLog; rather, it appears to have been a culmination of privacy concerns and changing societal attitudes towards data sharing."
Because a large chunk of the world either a) doesn't like Britain to begin with because "colonizer", b) is Muslim and wants to be able to follow this kind of practice, c) is European and has been told the British are racist because Brexit, and/or d) doesn't give a shit what happens to an island nation in the Atlantic that used to be powerful but no longer is.
Well, I can only speak for the Europeans I met and they all think Brexit = racist (well I'd say nationalist because I don't consider french/italian/german/spainiah/etc to be truly a race). And the colonists thing is something most of the left in the UK (which isn't small) seem to feel. And as for the Muslims... Well, the Pakistani variety seems to align to my statement. All that's left is the Row category
Did they forget they literally sent people to the US to campaign for Kamala??? They tried to interfere in our elections. They have no right to complain.
Britain still needs to arrest Christopher Steele, and issue a formal apology for what their miscreant citizen did to undermine a sitting US president. They are NATO "allies" and did nothing at all to try to stop the attempted removal of our duly elected commander in chief.
After that, we can wait for reparations for the damages caused by the British spooks who officially started, and spread the "weapons of mass destruction" lies.
As far as I'm concerned, America, and the loyal NATO nations have legal justification to invade Britain and remove their leaders by force.
Before too many accusations flow, the Deep State is a global matter, as with the elites and the super rich, so your CIA, MI6, MI5, FBI and all the rest are in it.
All your base belong to US.
EO 13848, right?
🐸🌽🚜 Pepe Farms Remembers This Story 🐸🌽🚜
You have no chance to survive make your time.
A quick 2 day assault and the UK can become a U.S territory. ( I am not advocting that the U.S. invade the U.K. it is just sickening the good people of England is losing theior freedons)
According to the Defense Casualty Analysis System, over 400,000 American service members died during World War II.
400,000 Americans died for Britian freedom and now they are just throwing it away.
Careful friend, you were late to the party and then only after Pearl Harbour. You didn't come to save UK but Europe. So your men didn't die for Britain's freedom, we had already been fighting for 2 years, and it was against the evil of Nazis and freedom for European countries.
I keep meaning to watch Europa
How is the entire World not enraged by this British Government's ignoring Rape & Grooming of native British girls? It was only a few years ago the women of the World were enraged by the #metoo movement. Where are your angry voices now? The Internet is not telling you to be angry at this particular massive injustice?
Stop spreading maldisformation! You must be a far right conspiracy theorist 😉 When foreign invaders do it it's 'good' rape, of course.
Ten reason why foreign invaders raping girl is good for Britain. Number 7 will shock you.
I think the excuse they used was something along the lines of "it's their culture..."
Were they ?
They were enraged..... They had to check their memo to know what it was they were enraged about
Yes they were! Facebook amplified the vilification.
So you believe LifeLog and what it amplifies (or doesn't) ?
u/#glowie
I have no idea what you;re getting at.
The CIA name for their project to develop a dossier on everyone was called LifeLog. The day that it was terminated was the day that FaceBook was established to allow people to supply their own data for their own dossier. Now I know that in fact you did/do trust them. Good Luck.
Whatever you say.
Not me saying:
"DARPA's LifeLog program was intended to create a comprehensive digital database of an individual's life experiences, tracking various aspects such as interactions, activities, and communications. The program was announced in 2003 but faced significant criticism over privacy concerns and the potential for misuse of personal data.
On February 4, 2004, the same day Facebook was launched, DARPA decided to cancel LifeLog. The cancellation has been interpreted in various ways. One significant factor was the backlash against the program, as many people were concerned about the implications of such extensive surveillance and data collection. With Facebook's launch, the landscape of social networking was evolving, and it became apparent that individuals were beginning to share much of their personal information voluntarily online, which might have made LifeLog seem redundant or overly intrusive.
The timing of the cancellation led to speculation and conspiracy theories linking the two events, suggesting that Facebook represented a more acceptable, user-driven approach to sharing personal information compared to a government-run program. However, there is no direct evidence to suggest that the launch of Facebook influenced DARPA's decision to cancel LifeLog; rather, it appears to have been a culmination of privacy concerns and changing societal attitudes towards data sharing."
https://www.quora.com/Why-did-DARPA-cancel-LifeLog-on-the-same-day-Facebook-was-launched
Who said that?
Not me saying:
"DARPA's LifeLog program was intended to create a comprehensive digital database of an individual's life experiences, tracking various aspects such as interactions, activities, and communications. The program was announced in 2003 but faced significant criticism over privacy concerns and the potential for misuse of personal data.
On February 4, 2004, the same day Facebook was launched, DARPA decided to cancel LifeLog. The cancellation has been interpreted in various ways. One significant factor was the backlash against the program, as many people were concerned about the implications of such extensive surveillance and data collection. With Facebook's launch, the landscape of social networking was evolving, and it became apparent that individuals were beginning to share much of their personal information voluntarily online, which might have made LifeLog seem redundant or overly intrusive.
The timing of the cancellation led to speculation and conspiracy theories linking the two events, suggesting that Facebook represented a more acceptable, user-driven approach to sharing personal information compared to a government-run program. However, there is no direct evidence to suggest that the launch of Facebook influenced DARPA's decision to cancel LifeLog; rather, it appears to have been a culmination of privacy concerns and changing societal attitudes towards data sharing."
https://www.quora.com/Why-did-DARPA-cancel-LifeLog-on-the-same-day-Facebook-was-launched
Because a large chunk of the world either a) doesn't like Britain to begin with because "colonizer", b) is Muslim and wants to be able to follow this kind of practice, c) is European and has been told the British are racist because Brexit, and/or d) doesn't give a shit what happens to an island nation in the Atlantic that used to be powerful but no longer is.
I hope this isn't how most people think of England atm.
Well, I can only speak for the Europeans I met and they all think Brexit = racist (well I'd say nationalist because I don't consider french/italian/german/spainiah/etc to be truly a race). And the colonists thing is something most of the left in the UK (which isn't small) seem to feel. And as for the Muslims... Well, the Pakistani variety seems to align to my statement. All that's left is the Row category
Five Eyes
u/#q1336
u/#q2655
Did they forget they literally sent people to the US to campaign for Kamala??? They tried to interfere in our elections. They have no right to complain.
Britain still needs to arrest Christopher Steele, and issue a formal apology for what their miscreant citizen did to undermine a sitting US president. They are NATO "allies" and did nothing at all to try to stop the attempted removal of our duly elected commander in chief.
After that, we can wait for reparations for the damages caused by the British spooks who officially started, and spread the "weapons of mass destruction" lies.
As far as I'm concerned, America, and the loyal NATO nations have legal justification to invade Britain and remove their leaders by force.
Except that a London court dismissed Donald Trump's lawsuit against Steele and his company, Orbis Business Intelligence, in February 2024.
Steele needs an arrest, trial, and firing squad for what he has done against America, not a lawsuit.
{edit} And, Britain, as a supposed NATO "ally" of the USA should be (should have been) leading that endeavor.
Before too many accusations flow, the Deep State is a global matter, as with the elites and the super rich, so your CIA, MI6, MI5, FBI and all the rest are in it.