They were there. Go back and look at the walkabout videos. The security were very unprofessional and their clothes did not represent the position of protecting tge POTUS. Many independent journos were reporting it.
The President and family are more vulnerable going up and down AF1 stairs. Where’s a canopy covering the stairs? It could be made of the same bullet proof glass that the lectern is made of. In these dangerous times, he doesn’t need to stand at the top of the stairs and wave.
The Chevy Suburban's are around the 2012 model year. And the first SUV isn't even a Chevy. Wouldn't they use newer units, to transport the most important couple on the planet at this moment and time? Very close-up video framing feels very psyopy also.
I don't think people really understand the absolute foolishness of digital cars. What a stupid fucking idea. What if it lags or freezes on the freeway?! Hacked? Car crashes because the software got a bad update?
The motorcades that he traveled to his rallies in used newer model SUV's over the past years. Why revert to old models now? If they are going to retrofit factory built units they could do the same with new year models. They practically have an unlimited budget for upgrading and adding back ups and failsafe systems.
They have had some Excursions for some time. I have even seen a Durango or two at times. Other than the armor upfitted vehicles, the others are standard police package vehicles. Probably comes down to who won the GSA bid.
100% of trained military Russians and Ukrainian soldiers died from drone bombs.
You can be an armchair expert all you want, but when you're in a war and being shot at, with multiple drone bombs attacking you, no amount of duck hunting will save you.
Ducks don't shoot back, or kamikaze suicide bomb you when you're duck hunting.
Kek, those don't won't on line of sight laser controlled drones. If we wanted to we could easily hurt a lot of people since our DoD is very slow and behind (I contract for DoD and we are yeara behind Russia and China for these communication systems)
Drones flying on the east coast for a month. There's a difference between an known threat and a potential threat. Besides, an known threat would be confronted directly and stopped. This is for the potential threats. The possibility of occurrence. Otherwise theybwould put trump innone of those cars theyed move him another way v
Those "drones" are part of a commercial venture and known not to be a threat to our security. I posted on this a day ir two ago but nobody gave a shit.
Rogue drones that could be weaponized is a whole other thing and I believe the real reason it's been moved inside.
I did not see dented cars and USSS in jeans, like 4 years ago moving buyden.
They were there. Go back and look at the walkabout videos. The security were very unprofessional and their clothes did not represent the position of protecting tge POTUS. Many independent journos were reporting it.
The best video of the state of the detail is when the Bidens came to Reno.
The President and family are more vulnerable going up and down AF1 stairs. Where’s a canopy covering the stairs? It could be made of the same bullet proof glass that the lectern is made of. In these dangerous times, he doesn’t need to stand at the top of the stairs and wave.
Forcing the chief executive into hiding is also a win for them
They care about power
Flaunting that you can handle their bullshit and still act normal is the biggest slap in the face.
“Go ahead and try”
You also shouldn't stand your general out in a field
Just part of the Ballet. But the Canopy a good idea.
lol.. look into the JFK assassination.. if they want him dead he's dead. how much time he spends at the top of the stairs is meaningless.
They don't just jam drones. They jam remote detonation devices, too.
The Chevy Suburban's are around the 2012 model year. And the first SUV isn't even a Chevy. Wouldn't they use newer units, to transport the most important couple on the planet at this moment and time? Very close-up video framing feels very psyopy also.
Modern cars are computers on wheels.
2012 may even be too new but maybe they got it retrofitted
The steering column needs to turn the wheel, not tell the computer to turn the wheel
The accelerator needs to pull a cord to tell the engine to throttle, not tell the computer to increase RPM
The brake pedal need to have a physical cable… etc
But with all systems
Force the bad guy to compromise each vehicle individually rather than exploit a vulnerability in all of them simultaneously
^this x1000
#MakeCarsAnalogAgain
I don't think people really understand the absolute foolishness of digital cars. What a stupid fucking idea. What if it lags or freezes on the freeway?! Hacked? Car crashes because the software got a bad update?
Don't get vax or Neuralink either.
The motorcades that he traveled to his rallies in used newer model SUV's over the past years. Why revert to old models now? If they are going to retrofit factory built units they could do the same with new year models. They practically have an unlimited budget for upgrading and adding back ups and failsafe systems.
They are running jamming devices. They will cause problems with newer models year vehicles being able to phone home to the OEMs.
They have had some Excursions for some time. I have even seen a Durango or two at times. Other than the armor upfitted vehicles, the others are standard police package vehicles. Probably comes down to who won the GSA bid.
Anti-drone jammer is a fancy way of saying remington 870 12 gauge loaded with pirhana shot
Shitloads of footage from Ukraine shows that shotguns are useless against actual drone warfare.
How many of those ukranians are seasoned duck hunters though?
100% of trained military Russians and Ukrainian soldiers died from drone bombs.
You can be an armchair expert all you want, but when you're in a war and being shot at, with multiple drone bombs attacking you, no amount of duck hunting will save you.
Ducks don't shoot back, or kamikaze suicide bomb you when you're duck hunting.
Imagine if skeet shooting becomes part of their bas8c training in the future
Kek, those don't won't on line of sight laser controlled drones. If we wanted to we could easily hurt a lot of people since our DoD is very slow and behind (I contract for DoD and we are yeara behind Russia and China for these communication systems)
Hopefully USA can catch up in the nex few years.
Those don't won't on line if sight?
probably meant "work"
or tethered to a spooling optical fiber, or the [theoretical] self-contained AI-on-board-by-sight-only type that may or may not exist.
Drones flying on the east coast for a month. There's a difference between an known threat and a potential threat. Besides, an known threat would be confronted directly and stopped. This is for the potential threats. The possibility of occurrence. Otherwise theybwould put trump innone of those cars theyed move him another way v
Those "drones" are part of a commercial venture and known not to be a threat to our security. I posted on this a day ir two ago but nobody gave a shit.
Rogue drones that could be weaponized is a whole other thing and I believe the real reason it's been moved inside.
It's not the 747. But would have been way cool if it was
Someone said they weren't jamming devices for drones but standard communication devices for satellite communications?
Seems like anti-drone tech would be standard on presidential motorcade
He wasn't supposed to turn his head.
Seems like they would always have these things install?