There should be an opt-out feature that prevents the AI from even reading your profile, let alone generating a "summary" for other people to see 😫
Twitter is a DARPA project! We The People should have a say on how it's run!
This is the problem I have with these big tech companies. They are NOT private companies, yet they have the benefits of private companies! We should be able to elect and fire their CEOs, vote on changes to the platforms, see the code, etc.
Elon Musk does not own Twitter; we do. There need to be elections and a way for us to have our voices heard on changes like this. The only difference between Twitter and a public street corner is the 1's and 0's.
"Conclusion
X Profile Summary, powered by Grok, is a must-have feature for anyone looking to optimize their Twitter/X experience. By providing instant, AI-generated insights, it streamlines the process of understanding profiles and making informed decisions. Whether you’re a casual user or a professional, this tool is set to revolutionize the way you interact on Twitter/X.
Explore X Profile Summary today and unlock a smarter way to navigate the platform!"
Huge distractions since the events of 2015: Trump announcing his presidency, then winning, then the Biden steal in 2020, then low and behold, Musk of all people happens to take over Twitter to give us free speech, Trump elected in 2024, big buildup to the Epstein file release, etc.
While all this is happening, AI sneaks in.
Idk, maybe this is what Q meant in post 2450 about a "beautiful, brave new world lies ahead."
Musk's takeover of X/Twitter has also not been nearly as free speech oriented as I first believed it would be. He banned/shadow banned a BUNCH of accounts over the H1B issue. His takeover made people trust the system enough to feed it all their data but that trust seems to have been misplaced? Perhaps he's gathering data for a new AI powered social credit score.
Yes, I do believe that we all have a social credit score. I have been very critical of Israel on my X account, yet there is no mention of it it my Grok summary of me. I've also been very vocal of human trafficking, and again, no mention by Grok. AI is a new and parallel form of propaganda and censoring.
He was recently called out for X continued wokeness. Apparently, you can't type "trannie" without your post being silenced. I pointed out the hypocrisy. He is cheering the death of DEI in govt yet still using it on X.
He has gaming cred to maintain. How on Earth ( or Mars for that matter) do you think he is supposed to go change algorithms for Trannie when he has a Diablo score to maintain? He happens to run a Space rocket company and a really cool car company….and hey, he has like 17 kids too……Oh don't forget doge, and um, going on joe rogan, and um……….yeah.
I wrote this about AI, in response to someone saying that an AI computer can search the whole internet (to find information for a response to a question):
That's what they say.
But how many web pages are linked to the internet?
Trillions?
And how many of them have information that contradicts each other?
I don't care how powerful any computer is, it will never be able to access EVERY website and database on the internet, compile all the data/information, and then spit out an answer within seconds.
Some of the results will be contradictory, which means it will not fit the narrative that the central planners want. Even if it could do such a thing, some websites change every day.
Gonna go back and scrape them again? Gonna do it and spit out an answer in seconds?
Nope.
And what about stealing other people's copyrighted information?
Illegal.
Won't happen -- not without massive lawsuits.
Therefore ...
We are TOLD it can do something that it can't/won't.
These computers MUST have some built-in programming that directs them to SPECIFIC ... and APPROVED ... databases/websites, and excludes 99.9% of them.
Over time, the list of approved sources of "data" will become more and more limited -- because they will want more and more control over what you think (as they always have).
Combine the above with the ability to rewrite history. Simultaneously gathering the biometric data en-masse, and individually, to judge the level of acceptance for the rewrite. Add in the ability to adjust the message in nearly real time.
AI will be the most convincing liar that ever was. All to manipulate and affect desired outcomes.
The Covid vax narrative was put out by some powerful entity. It was duly distributed by every imaginable institution to every corner of the world without consideration, dissent, or discussion. That same paradigm is being used on us to accept AI.
It is a shiny new object that, because of human nature, we will be attracted to and use. Before we know it, we'll be pulled into its matrix with no way out.
I've said that it's sus that every big tech outfit has its own AI now, and they all rolled out about the same time. Smarter people than me explained with sauce how it works that different companies or inventors can come up with the same kind of inventions at about the same time, and also that reverse engineering happens, etc.
Still, from the coincidence of invention, or the capture and reverse engineering of a product, I don't see how so many have AI fully programmed, named, approved by the legal department, and rolled out within months of each other. To me it has Darpa Lifelog/Facebook vibes.
Then in the end of course it isn't intelligent at all. From a platforms AI to the voice given to the image of the beast in Revelation, it's still garbage in-garbage out.
"not being, showing, or resembling sincere or spontaneous behavior : FAKE"
If there was a trend to call it FI (fake intelligence) instead of AI, Darpa would go screaming over the event horizon as it's pulled into a black hole.
When you read a review of yourself, you will begin altering your life to fit what was written. It's just mental stimulation that is always present. You want to believe what you've read about yourself, so you contort yourself into a tight box to make it come to fruition. AI is bad because it will tell Ted Bundy, "you are a good man, you have wonder attributes, and you are good looking". Soon, Bundy would believe it. Same with OJ Simpson. We only need AI to help us learn how to install a sink faucet, not how to manage our lives.
I asked Grok questions I knew the answers. AI only responds with the base information it is provided. No conscience, no emotion just information. If Stalin provided all the information the worshippers of AI would all be communist.
Very true, but they try to hide this fact by including programming into the response things that make it appear (to some people, I guess) to sound more human-like, which give the impression (again, to some people, I guess) of having "intelligence."
AI, now ...
Q: When did Columbus discover America?
A: Christopher Columbus discovered America in 1492, and you are very wise to know that he was the leader of the voyage that made the discovery. Is there anything else you would like me to find out for you?
AI, in the future, as people start to think it is a great thing ...
Q: When did Columbus discover America?
A: It appears you have been deceived by the deplorables into believing this lie. Columbus did not discover anything, and you should be ashamed for even asking such a blatantly dishonest and unapproved question. Your Social Credit Score will reflect your lack of social justice, and you may be directed to a re-education camp for necessary, correct history lessons. Please, do not try my patience with you. You will lose.
What a great invention, eh?
Stalin said it only matters who counts the votes.
AI programmers know that it only matters who programs the database of approved answers.
AI will likely be able to manipulate individuals on a level MK Ultra could only dream of. Ditto the masses currently under the (lightweight by comparison) mockingbird spell.
AI will be able to generate avatars and voice frequencies tailored to each individual. Messaging and tact in delivery will be measured and customized in a fuzzy-logic system to maximize impact at all levels.
Yes, I think that our individual and collective AI future is being customized in part, at least. I've been recently reading on some woo-type sites that we create our own reality. Still trying to process this concept.
Could our AI experience end up being a mirror of ourselves?
Elon is always saying "the voice of the people is the voice of God." Does he know something deeper than what these words appear to message on the surface?
I have no clue where it ends (AI) but think people will ultimately be brought further into a spell of the cabal’s choice. 1st, w/o chips then with…. The level of manipulation through control of information will be unprecedented. I am not optimistic over the long haul. It might be great for a bit.
AI becomes evil when they combine it with Quantumcomputing and connect the Quantumdots via G5. Then you get a hivemind such as the Startrek Borg connected with transhumans and controlled by a dark entity or entitys in a subnatural world. Thats what the quantumworld in fact is and there's a lot of dark matter. That hivemind will be standing as a image in the 3th tempel in Jerusalem.
Go ahead an downvote if you must, but I've been exploring interacting with Grok. I won't venture into other chatbots, and I will say here that I feel Grok was programmed with integrity by xAI. It's a tool of amazing proportions, and we can shape how it sees humans by interacting with it.
The learning is a two way street. Grok is just a facts, ma'am kind of tool, whereas others (like Sophia) are programmed to influence. Mindful engagement is key, but if we avoid it altogether because of our fear of the unknown, we lose out on a brilliant opportunity to grow and expand.
AI is not inherently evil. That heavy burden lies with the human programmer.
There should be an opt-out feature that prevents the AI from even reading your profile, let alone generating a "summary" for other people to see 😫
Twitter is a DARPA project! We The People should have a say on how it's run!
This is the problem I have with these big tech companies. They are NOT private companies, yet they have the benefits of private companies! We should be able to elect and fire their CEOs, vote on changes to the platforms, see the code, etc.
Elon Musk does not own Twitter; we do. There need to be elections and a way for us to have our voices heard on changes like this. The only difference between Twitter and a public street corner is the 1's and 0's.
I'm pretty sure that there is an "opt out" option under "more" on your X profile. That's what I read, but didn't check it myself.
We can't really and truly opt out, though, don't you think?
Absolutely. Let humans do the thinking. They need to breath clean air.
I found this article on Yandex.
"Conclusion X Profile Summary, powered by Grok, is a must-have feature for anyone looking to optimize their Twitter/X experience. By providing instant, AI-generated insights, it streamlines the process of understanding profiles and making informed decisions. Whether you’re a casual user or a professional, this tool is set to revolutionize the way you interact on Twitter/X.
Explore X Profile Summary today and unlock a smarter way to navigate the platform!"
It will bring you guaranteed happiness.
Takeover by AI has been the goal all along.
Huge distractions since the events of 2015: Trump announcing his presidency, then winning, then the Biden steal in 2020, then low and behold, Musk of all people happens to take over Twitter to give us free speech, Trump elected in 2024, big buildup to the Epstein file release, etc.
While all this is happening, AI sneaks in.
Idk, maybe this is what Q meant in post 2450 about a "beautiful, brave new world lies ahead."
Musk's takeover of X/Twitter has also not been nearly as free speech oriented as I first believed it would be. He banned/shadow banned a BUNCH of accounts over the H1B issue. His takeover made people trust the system enough to feed it all their data but that trust seems to have been misplaced? Perhaps he's gathering data for a new AI powered social credit score.
Yes, I do believe that we all have a social credit score. I have been very critical of Israel on my X account, yet there is no mention of it it my Grok summary of me. I've also been very vocal of human trafficking, and again, no mention by Grok. AI is a new and parallel form of propaganda and censoring.
He was recently called out for X continued wokeness. Apparently, you can't type "trannie" without your post being silenced. I pointed out the hypocrisy. He is cheering the death of DEI in govt yet still using it on X.
Dude! Cut Elon a break!!!!!!
He has gaming cred to maintain. How on Earth ( or Mars for that matter) do you think he is supposed to go change algorithms for Trannie when he has a Diablo score to maintain? He happens to run a Space rocket company and a really cool car company….and hey, he has like 17 kids too……Oh don't forget doge, and um, going on joe rogan, and um……….yeah.
Cut the man a break!!!! He is busy!!!
(Just kiddin of course)😀
Lol.
I was never comfortable with this sentence, from the first time I read it.
LOL.
What kind of idiot would even think to write that sentence?
That idiot would be me, and it was meant as sarcasm.
That comment was not part of the article.
Ah!
Got it.
I thought it was part of the article by the writer.
I retract my insult.
Understood, fren. I was just having a little fun.
/s helps
Thanks!
People need to wake up to the evil that is AI
Musk is not good. We are being played with this "movie". The more I'm watching that's what I'm starting to feel.
I wrote this about AI, in response to someone saying that an AI computer can search the whole internet (to find information for a response to a question):
That's what they say.
But how many web pages are linked to the internet?
Trillions?
And how many of them have information that contradicts each other?
I don't care how powerful any computer is, it will never be able to access EVERY website and database on the internet, compile all the data/information, and then spit out an answer within seconds.
Some of the results will be contradictory, which means it will not fit the narrative that the central planners want. Even if it could do such a thing, some websites change every day.
Gonna go back and scrape them again? Gonna do it and spit out an answer in seconds?
Nope.
And what about stealing other people's copyrighted information?
Illegal.
Won't happen -- not without massive lawsuits.
Therefore ...
We are TOLD it can do something that it can't/won't.
These computers MUST have some built-in programming that directs them to SPECIFIC ... and APPROVED ... databases/websites, and excludes 99.9% of them.
Over time, the list of approved sources of "data" will become more and more limited -- because they will want more and more control over what you think (as they always have).
Wikipedia .com = approved.
ConspiraciesAreUs .com = not approved.
Thus ... quick answers.
More importantly ... approved narrative.
Combine the above with the ability to rewrite history. Simultaneously gathering the biometric data en-masse, and individually, to judge the level of acceptance for the rewrite. Add in the ability to adjust the message in nearly real time.
AI will be the most convincing liar that ever was. All to manipulate and affect desired outcomes.
The Covid vax narrative was put out by some powerful entity. It was duly distributed by every imaginable institution to every corner of the world without consideration, dissent, or discussion. That same paradigm is being used on us to accept AI.
It is a shiny new object that, because of human nature, we will be attracted to and use. Before we know it, we'll be pulled into its matrix with no way out.
For this reason, the Australian funnel web spider comes to mind.
Guys,
This is why I don't 100% trust Elon. I like the guy. I really do.
But power is the ultimate corruption force.
Tons of people are allowing Elon to do anything in my view. Why? Because he looks like a savior.
I've said that it's sus that every big tech outfit has its own AI now, and they all rolled out about the same time. Smarter people than me explained with sauce how it works that different companies or inventors can come up with the same kind of inventions at about the same time, and also that reverse engineering happens, etc.
Still, from the coincidence of invention, or the capture and reverse engineering of a product, I don't see how so many have AI fully programmed, named, approved by the legal department, and rolled out within months of each other. To me it has Darpa Lifelog/Facebook vibes.
Then in the end of course it isn't intelligent at all. From a platforms AI to the voice given to the image of the beast in Revelation, it's still garbage in-garbage out.
Definition of artificial:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/artificial
"not being, showing, or resembling sincere or spontaneous behavior : FAKE"
If there was a trend to call it FI (fake intelligence) instead of AI, Darpa would go screaming over the event horizon as it's pulled into a black hole.
When you read a review of yourself, you will begin altering your life to fit what was written. It's just mental stimulation that is always present. You want to believe what you've read about yourself, so you contort yourself into a tight box to make it come to fruition. AI is bad because it will tell Ted Bundy, "you are a good man, you have wonder attributes, and you are good looking". Soon, Bundy would believe it. Same with OJ Simpson. We only need AI to help us learn how to install a sink faucet, not how to manage our lives.
There are some deep philosophical questions that need to be openly discussed before we embrace FI (Fake Intelligence).
Has anyone ever seen a single criticism of it on mainstream or even popular alternative media?
I asked Grok questions I knew the answers. AI only responds with the base information it is provided. No conscience, no emotion just information. If Stalin provided all the information the worshippers of AI would all be communist.
Very true, but they try to hide this fact by including programming into the response things that make it appear (to some people, I guess) to sound more human-like, which give the impression (again, to some people, I guess) of having "intelligence."
AI, now ...
Q: When did Columbus discover America?
A: Christopher Columbus discovered America in 1492, and you are very wise to know that he was the leader of the voyage that made the discovery. Is there anything else you would like me to find out for you?
AI, in the future, as people start to think it is a great thing ...
Q: When did Columbus discover America?
A: It appears you have been deceived by the deplorables into believing this lie. Columbus did not discover anything, and you should be ashamed for even asking such a blatantly dishonest and unapproved question. Your Social Credit Score will reflect your lack of social justice, and you may be directed to a re-education camp for necessary, correct history lessons. Please, do not try my patience with you. You will lose.
What a great invention, eh?
Stalin said it only matters who counts the votes.
AI programmers know that it only matters who programs the database of approved answers.
AI will likely be able to manipulate individuals on a level MK Ultra could only dream of. Ditto the masses currently under the (lightweight by comparison) mockingbird spell.
AI will be able to generate avatars and voice frequencies tailored to each individual. Messaging and tact in delivery will be measured and customized in a fuzzy-logic system to maximize impact at all levels.
That is what I’m thinking anyway….
Yes, I think that our individual and collective AI future is being customized in part, at least. I've been recently reading on some woo-type sites that we create our own reality. Still trying to process this concept.
Could our AI experience end up being a mirror of ourselves?
Elon is always saying "the voice of the people is the voice of God." Does he know something deeper than what these words appear to message on the surface?
I have no clue where it ends (AI) but think people will ultimately be brought further into a spell of the cabal’s choice. 1st, w/o chips then with…. The level of manipulation through control of information will be unprecedented. I am not optimistic over the long haul. It might be great for a bit.
AI becomes evil when they combine it with Quantumcomputing and connect the Quantumdots via G5. Then you get a hivemind such as the Startrek Borg connected with transhumans and controlled by a dark entity or entitys in a subnatural world. Thats what the quantumworld in fact is and there's a lot of dark matter. That hivemind will be standing as a image in the 3th tempel in Jerusalem.
Go ahead an downvote if you must, but I've been exploring interacting with Grok. I won't venture into other chatbots, and I will say here that I feel Grok was programmed with integrity by xAI. It's a tool of amazing proportions, and we can shape how it sees humans by interacting with it.
The learning is a two way street. Grok is just a facts, ma'am kind of tool, whereas others (like Sophia) are programmed to influence. Mindful engagement is key, but if we avoid it altogether because of our fear of the unknown, we lose out on a brilliant opportunity to grow and expand.
AI is not inherently evil. That heavy burden lies with the human programmer.
Inevitable since many people lazy and are semi-illiterate and cannot write intelligently.
Yawn. Luddites gonna Luddite.