The whole episode is basically saying, "How do I elaborate on every single Q-related conspiracy while completely denying Q exists." It's almost as if there was someone pulling their strings. And how many times can Ian say "Bingo" in three hours?
Maybe he is doing his part for game theory. He seems to be extremely intelligent with his researching. I'm sure if he did any research into Q he would have figured it out. He does a great job of reaching people with his breakdown tiktok style videos. Maybe he was asked to stay away from Q, so they couldn't use it against him and he would continue opening people's eyes to other things. Kind of like when Kash or Flynn would say there is no such thing as Q, but then also say WWG1WGA and NCSWIC. Stuff like that lol I don't know, just spitballin
It doesn't matter who believes Q was legit or not at this point. The damage to the cabal has been done and patriots are activated, and the future will keep proving the past. Remember, there's only one of six of the first set filled in https://files.catbox.moe/v6pjun.png
Yes, there are ample proofs to convince me that Q was more than a larper, but there are people to this day. who are looking at 7-year deltas that are just simply out of their minds, imo.
The nut jobs have turned Q into a time travelling cult for the simple-minded followers of nonsensical belief.
I think he was pointing out the extreme nutjobs of the Q religion. To this day whack-a-doodles still post "watch the water" every time something happens near a body of water, or someone spills a glass at a restaurant.
Then you have the numerology/kabbalist types who came up with the whole, "Add the number of these time stamps and it equates to this word and look up this word in the Q drops and it appears 9 times now subtract 9 from the numerological sum of the time stamp and you will see the end of the world should take place on March 7th, thus sayith the Q.
And if you argue with the yam bags they just say you don't know how to read the comms.
Q was a psychological operation that achieved its desired effect of getting people look past the headlines and dig a bit deeper. Can we just leave it at that without turning it into some sort of time travelling religion?
It is extreme Qtards and controlled opposition operatives who make the whole Q operation look like the fantasies of deranged minds.
Q team is out there watching as we speak, just shaking their heads at the folly of lemmings.
That is my point. It never was Q that said all this bullshit it was anons who try to tell you and me what Q was really saying. I do not need some basement dwelling pimple faced coder telling me what Q said, I can read it for myself which is what Q+ urged us all to do. Go research it for yourself. On top of that Q said do not believe me go research it and he said disinformation released by him was necessary.
It is the delusional narcissists that took his words and spun it into a deranged cult following with absurd beliefs that Q never even hinted at.
Fair enough but remember they were commenting on an HBO documentary about "Qanon". Of course, the documentary is going to be all about the lunatics not what Q actually said. That is what the left does, they insert lunatics and fabrications into any truth telling operation so they can discredit it.
I heard that as a sarcastic comment about it being "debunked as a crazy Q conspiracy". He clearly believes it's true. One thing he didn't mention was that the journalist who "debunked" it was convicted of possession of child porn.
Also, when they touched on Andrew Breitbart's sudden death, they brought up the coroner dying but not the dinner that Breitbart and Tucker Carlson attended at Bill Ayer's home a few weeks prior.
Bill Ayers auctioned off a dinner on 2/7/2012 to raise money for something and Tucker Carlson won it at $2500. Tucker invited Andrew Breitbart, Matt Labash, Jamie Weinstein and some other staff from his site at that time, The Daily Caller. They intended to ask Bill Ayers and his wife a bunch of questions about their relationship with Obama. In case you don't recall, there were rumors that Bill Ayers actually ghostwrote Obama's second book, and his first two books supposedly helped increase his popularity to win both elections. Also at this time, Andrew Breitbart was (probably unwisely) advertising that he had damaging information on Obama. Then he died suddenly on 3/1/2012. I tried to find online links to news coverage, but couldn't find one I thought worthy of linking.
I’m not sure what he is talking about when he says none of it can be confirmed through open source research. That’s literally the whole reason the anons were convinced Q was legit. 4chan, 8chan, 8kun… the most powerful investigative force on the planet, and he thinks they are nutjobs? Starting to wonder about this guy to be honest. I saw he was trying to black pill people about the Epstein stuff ever being released as well and turn people against Trump
The whole episode is basically saying, "How do I elaborate on every single Q-related conspiracy while completely denying Q exists." It's almost as if there was someone pulling their strings. And how many times can Ian say "Bingo" in three hours?
Bingo!
Maybe he is doing his part for game theory. He seems to be extremely intelligent with his researching. I'm sure if he did any research into Q he would have figured it out. He does a great job of reaching people with his breakdown tiktok style videos. Maybe he was asked to stay away from Q, so they couldn't use it against him and he would continue opening people's eyes to other things. Kind of like when Kash or Flynn would say there is no such thing as Q, but then also say WWG1WGA and NCSWIC. Stuff like that lol I don't know, just spitballin
yes good points
The fact that they talk about is enough for me, it shows Q lives rent free in their minds.
It doesn't matter who believes Q was legit or not at this point. The damage to the cabal has been done and patriots are activated, and the future will keep proving the past. Remember, there's only one of six of the first set filled in https://files.catbox.moe/v6pjun.png
There are more than enough proven Q drops to show that somehow drops are predicting future events. They are cryptic and do hit the nail on the head!
Yes, there are ample proofs to convince me that Q was more than a larper, but there are people to this day. who are looking at 7-year deltas that are just simply out of their minds, imo.
The nut jobs have turned Q into a time travelling cult for the simple-minded followers of nonsensical belief.
Q was a gift to those that can discern for themselves. Nobody else needs to believe it was a back channel direct line to the meme makers.
Did anyone catch the part where Ian and Joe discussed MK-Ultra style sexual trauma based programming on Epstein Island?
Q was obviously legit, but pizzagate predates Q. Q tapped into the already existing pizzagate research community, Q did not create pizzagate.
I just listened to the whole thing, Joe is huge and exposing millions to what we already know. Q knew it would be this way
I think he was pointing out the extreme nutjobs of the Q religion. To this day whack-a-doodles still post "watch the water" every time something happens near a body of water, or someone spills a glass at a restaurant.
Then you have the numerology/kabbalist types who came up with the whole, "Add the number of these time stamps and it equates to this word and look up this word in the Q drops and it appears 9 times now subtract 9 from the numerological sum of the time stamp and you will see the end of the world should take place on March 7th, thus sayith the Q.
And if you argue with the yam bags they just say you don't know how to read the comms.
Q was a psychological operation that achieved its desired effect of getting people look past the headlines and dig a bit deeper. Can we just leave it at that without turning it into some sort of time travelling religion?
It is extreme Qtards and controlled opposition operatives who make the whole Q operation look like the fantasies of deranged minds.
Q team is out there watching as we speak, just shaking their heads at the folly of lemmings.
That's not Q though. It sounds like they are doing the same thing MSM does when they talk about "Qanon influencers" and things like that.
That is my point. It never was Q that said all this bullshit it was anons who try to tell you and me what Q was really saying. I do not need some basement dwelling pimple faced coder telling me what Q said, I can read it for myself which is what Q+ urged us all to do. Go research it for yourself. On top of that Q said do not believe me go research it and he said disinformation released by him was necessary.
It is the delusional narcissists that took his words and spun it into a deranged cult following with absurd beliefs that Q never even hinted at.
My point is Rogan and Ian should recognize that and stfu about Q.
Fair enough but remember they were commenting on an HBO documentary about "Qanon". Of course, the documentary is going to be all about the lunatics not what Q actually said. That is what the left does, they insert lunatics and fabrications into any truth telling operation so they can discredit it.
So why buy into that? It's moronic.
Accurate and well stated!
I heard that as a sarcastic comment about it being "debunked as a crazy Q conspiracy". He clearly believes it's true. One thing he didn't mention was that the journalist who "debunked" it was convicted of possession of child porn.
Also, when they touched on Andrew Breitbart's sudden death, they brought up the coroner dying but not the dinner that Breitbart and Tucker Carlson attended at Bill Ayer's home a few weeks prior.
Interesting. Did they interview Ayers?
Bill Ayers auctioned off a dinner on 2/7/2012 to raise money for something and Tucker Carlson won it at $2500. Tucker invited Andrew Breitbart, Matt Labash, Jamie Weinstein and some other staff from his site at that time, The Daily Caller. They intended to ask Bill Ayers and his wife a bunch of questions about their relationship with Obama. In case you don't recall, there were rumors that Bill Ayers actually ghostwrote Obama's second book, and his first two books supposedly helped increase his popularity to win both elections. Also at this time, Andrew Breitbart was (probably unwisely) advertising that he had damaging information on Obama. Then he died suddenly on 3/1/2012. I tried to find online links to news coverage, but couldn't find one I thought worthy of linking.
I’m not sure what he is talking about when he says none of it can be confirmed through open source research. That’s literally the whole reason the anons were convinced Q was legit. 4chan, 8chan, 8kun… the most powerful investigative force on the planet, and he thinks they are nutjobs? Starting to wonder about this guy to be honest. I saw he was trying to black pill people about the Epstein stuff ever being released as well and turn people against Trump
Same. David Icke posed a question as to how this dude came out of nowhere. When Icke has been banned from countries for saying similar things.
Remember when HBO did that piece on "Q" and father/son Watkins?
Pepe Farms Remembers...
https://www.hbo.com/q-into-the-storm
Codemonkeyz is definately behind Q according to these two guys here. Why? Why do I waste my time here? lol lol lol lol lol
There’s something about Ian Carrol I don’t like or maybe don’t trust.
This link helps support Ian's claims around the 2:26 time of the Interview. https://christiansfortruth.com/meet-abe-feinberg-americas-most-powerful-and-feared-zionist-godfather-youve-probably-never-heard-of/