Jury finds Greenpeace liable for hundreds of millions in relation to pipeline protest damage | CNN
A North Dakota jury on Wednesday found Greenpeace liable for millions of dollars in damages to a giant pipeline company in relation to protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline nearly a decade ago.
All these CIA front groups suddenly have cover stories for closing shop. Wonder why.
There's no more money coming out of the money laundering machines.
Somehow, I feel that wrecking people's pipeline infrastructure projects is not the American way. Wait up. [cough: Nordstream]
They were a Righteous bunch when they were protecting the endangered Whales.
Many organizations start with good intentions, and then a bunch of Karens get in charge and it's all downhill from there.
Yes, but there were some leaders in GP who disagreed with the CO2 thing.
Same ones endangering japanese fishermen by ramming into their boat with outriggers in the water???
Phuck em.
They're another dirty clown NGO nonprofit anyway
Just like DemonRats they sell people on benevolence then act like terrorists
Iirc there was an older interview with Tom Woods where he interviewed an original Greenpeace founder who discussed how the organization got subverted.
GOOD RIDDANCE.
Ah, two of them.
https://tomwoods.com/ep-1937-patrick-moore-on-fake-invisible-catastrophes-and-threats-of-doom/
https://tomwoods.com/ep-1386-down-with-the-green-new-deal-says-former-greenpeace-director-patrick-moore/
It's always "follow the $$"!
My wife was very high up in Greenpeace when I met her. Even though she was a lib (then) she wasn’t down w all the lunacy going on inside of GP. I met and knew a bunch of them and all were Tesla burners in the making. The court ruling will be appealed, and they have attorneys on staff, but if ruling is upheld, GP go bye bye.
And no usaid to bail them out!
Wait a second. This is from CNN. Whenever I use CNN to share info about a topic I'm debating about with someone, it's automatically dismissed by saying they're known liars. But they're trustworthy now? 🤷♀️
(I'm not saying the information above isn't true. Just pointing out a double standard that I find particularly obnoxious. Thank you for your time. I now return you to your regularly scheduled program.)
Wait a second. This is from CNN. Whenever I use CNN to share info about a topic I'm debating about with someone, it's automatically dismissed by saying they're known liars. But they're trustworthy now? 🤷♀️
(I'm not saying the information above isn't true. Just pointing out a double standard that I find particularly obnoxious. Thank you for your time. I now return you to your regularly scheduled program.)
Nice title Johnny.
Good, those protesters were filthy and awful. They tried drowned a deer in the lake to eat it, I don't know what else they did but that was on video. Where they were camping they left so much filth and garbage behind it took forever to clean it up. ND is a VERYYY clean state, and where they camped was a disgusting eyesore they left pets behind, all their belongings. They had to clear out when the lake started to melt. Even the leader of the tribe there was trying to tell them to leave but they wouldn't listen. We knew they were being paid to protest.
Just an fyi the whole reason the protest even started was that the tribe wanted more money from the oil company to go through their land, it never was about the lake. The company refused and then the protests started and then the oil company decided to go around the tribal lands. The news will tell you otherwise but those of us here in ND knew this from the get go.
Back in December 2014, they permanently damaged one of the Nazca Lines in Peru for a publicity stunt about renewable energy. One activist was fined and sentenced.
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-30422994
There were so many of them and none of them were even from this state. It was the same type of stuff with George flood pallets of brick appeared all over Fargo and Grand Forks. Fargo had riots GF didn't
When I see protestors I see payments from Soros/USAID it means from us the US taxpayers. My dad used to tell me when you see protestors you know 💯 that they have been paid. Normal people like you and me go to work and don’t have time for things like this unless we all need to go out for major problems that our country is facing.
Those greenpeace fuckers are crazy. They didn't start out that way but those commies sure made that hard left turn.
Them and other EPA lunatics held up Mountain Valley Pipeline for years and Billions of investors dollars and it is for the poorest people in the Appalachia's.
Free speech again. Everyone is using that phrase. Yes I believe in free speech & I bet everyone else here does too but what when they freely speak lies, and encourage the destruction of property?
Meanwhile these same people have called what we speak about to be lies and claim that our actions can potentially cause harm & so it's nice to see it come back on them but we have to come to a more refined clarification of what is & isn't free speech for this article claims that this is a loss for free speech. (Being CNN I don't trust it of course but then there has to be some sort of accountability of reporting once again)
If the left didn't have double standards, they would have no standards at all!
exactly, kek! But there needs to be a return of accountability in journalism.
I remember the left's free speech crusades in the 80's and 90's. Imagine their reaction if you tried to tell them back then "Buh-buh-but MISINFORMASHUN!"
Inciting riots or violence or criminal activities aren't covered under free speech.
Way too many people don't understand what free speech actually is. It doesn't mean that you can say whatever you want, whenever you want, whereever you want (which seems to be the definition believed by so many).
It doesn't mean companies, such as social media sites, are obligated to provide you with a platform to say whatever you'd like.
Freedom of speech is the right to express your opinions and ideas without government punishment or censorship, as long as it doesn’t break the law (like threats or inciting violence).
And it's not only liberals who either don't understand what Freedom of Speech is or have double standards. I've had plenty of arguments with anons right here over the years about this.
For instance, freedom of speech isn't having the right to claim whatever you like and others aren't able to say you're wrong about it. That's one I'm noticing that's popular right now. Having a "fact checker" status slapped on something someone said isn't violating their freedom of speech.