I know that many here also visit the Treehouse.
I have been following (and lightly contributing to) that site for almost 12 years. I’ve found the commentaries by Sundance to be one of my most consistant and valuable resources. I may not always agree with him, but over the years he’s seldom steered me wrong. The daily comment section has been top-notch with level-headed discussions, insights, humor and mutual respect.
However . . . in recent weeks the site has taken a turn to the dark. Sundance’s commentaries are increasingly negative to the Trump team causing fighting and division among the posters. He seems to have taken some kind of perverse glee at the potential of Canadian suffering at the hands of the USA.
This morning during a discussion a few of us made note of this. (This was in todays Sundance attack on Patel and Bongino.) I made a light-hearted comment along the lines of “Something here is off. Sundance . . . blink three times if you need help!”
The short discussion between 3 or 4 of us has since vanished. I made a follow-up post this afternoon, again non-inflammatory, but it appears that I have now been banned from the site.
My worry: Sundance has either been psyops all along. Or he has been replaced. Something is terribly off. Can anyone here either confirm or deny my observations?
Before 2020, it was my go to site. After the election, it was total black pills and anyone mentioning Q was banned. I followed a recommendation and came here. Also, that trip he made to DC where he was visiting with all sorts of movers and shakers fizzled into the ether. No reports, no changes, and in the midst of so much evidence, he continued with the black pills. He seemed to see Trumps first election so clearly and turned into Jeb Bush style commentary after 2020.
It occurred to me that he might have been threatened on his vaunted trip to DC. But he morphed into Breitbart and I stopped following both.
Same. After the DC trip and the "silos of information" post, it got harder to read. At first I thought maybe things were that bad and there was no hope. After I found GAW however, I was able to stomach the Biden years, because I could see how many people were waking up to what was happening, which in turn brought us Trump 2.0. I am very wary now of those concern trolls who are trying to turn the Trump admin against each other, but the Trump 2.0 team sees it too. Sundance needs to maybe take a step (or several) away from the keyboard for a bit. He's an astute observer, but I think he's sucked himself into the doom and gloom. Thank you to you and 81532Ran for sharing your observations.
He was also in Russia recently and reported back with glowing platitudes.
He is often correct in terms of traditional politicking.
The problem is he doesn't understand that everything he believes is complete and utter bullshit.
He can't see what's directly in front of him because of this.
I follow Sundance on X because he occasionally has some good insights, but he's pretty full of himself and thinks he's smarter than just about everybody. He's always been condescending and dismissive of anything Q related, so I've always taken his opinions with that in mind I rarely visit CTH.
To be fair? He is smarter than just about anyone else, haha.
Sucks, tho.
He was black pulled after the DC trip.
I stopped reading afterwards.
I've noticed the same thing. He has also been commenting on the X platform quite a bit and did not do so in the past. Strange.
"Sundance has either been psyops all along. "
...it is all psyops...
...or kayfabe as we dogs would say...
...doggy winks...
I can confirm. Been a longtime reader of Sundance going back at least a decade, and I especially his work during the first Trump term as he was one of the only conservative commentators to fully appreciate the nuance of DJT's foreign policy and international trade.
But I've noticed in the past 24 months on X that there's been a slow but noticeable trend towards discord that sometimes veers into outright antagonism. I don't know the man so I can't claim to know why. Perhaps problems in his personal life as that's usually where my mind goes when someone's personality changes for the negative.
As Maclaren/Watson said "Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle."
I've never followed CTH closely. AFAIK they have never been first to break any "in real time" news... they're a paytriot news aggregator and anti Q, so I've always dismissed them as a lack luster source.
I am familiar with Sundance’s site. Used to love it, but he was adamantly against Q and banded some people back then. I think people that aren’t familiar with the Q drops & the Great Awakening miss some important connections. I am not sure if he is controlled opposition or not. He does seem to want to control people who post on his site.
I never could understand the use of a pseudonym. They try to frame it as being needed for his protection from the nefarious black hats, because he’s some leader of the opposition. Does anyone here actually believe that if the cabal felt threatened by anyone, that they wouldn’t be able to uncover their identity!
I completely understand why us ordinary low level grunts need anonymity, due to the unhinged low level grunts of the left, but for someone who is supposedly a mover and a shaker in DC affairs it doesn’t compute.
I was there all during the 2016 campaign. Then in November 2017 there was a link to the Q operation in the comments there and for me that was the beginning of Q and the end of visiting that site. There was a time when after one of the national elections, 2018? he blamed Q anons for the losses that year. I never went back, was fairly angry as the motto states WWG1WGA and that attitude was not helpful.
About a couple of months after Q appeared, Sundance shut down all Q mentions/convos/comments on the site. He acted spooked by something and would only say, along these paraphrased lines "Nope. We're not going to discuss that." I've been off about him since that time. Total kibosh on the subject.
I've noticed a concerted effort, focused on Trump's cabinet, to sow doubt and try to turn against him from certain "loud mouths" in the movement... It's all over the place lately. Including the whining about the Epstein files...as if possessing them would pacify any of these noncontributing zeros...
Too early for me to pick sides. Sundance may very well be right that Patel/Bongino are weak picks for not going after the FBI rank and file hard enough like Trump's other cabinet picks are doing in their departments. Right now I lean to it being an intentional 5D chess strategy. The other departments are merely full of incompetents funding left wing causes, while the FBI is full of dangerous blackmailers and murderers who have to be flushed out and taken down before they do serious harm.