Epstein didn't kill himself... The Cabal knows he got away | Sleepydude
(sleepydude.substack.com)
🗣️ A Good Anon Theory 💬
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Up or down, Personally, I think he’s alive.
🤔Hmmm I’ll give you that one, good point
The way the Epstein saga came to a supposed end for me has the same feeling as Sandy Hook, Butler shooting, Biden’s inauguration, the Las Vegas shootings. A flurry of events, confusion, media distortions, then nothing. No follow up, no decisive reasoned analysis, nothing. A staged event where nothing makes sense and suddenly it’s over. There’s no trial, no evidence to examine. Another moon landing scenario? The public is played for a fool over and over. How can anyone watch MSM news? Who wants to read a “newspaper” anymore? It’s getting old.
I think he's alive, but the good guys got him. That's my hope, at least.
and they are lying to the public and his victims about it? wouldnt good guys with any actual power be able to secure him and be honest about it?
No, because that would have all the pedo’s trying to get at Trump harder and also get out of the country. Better to let them continue with thinking they don’t have (as much) to worry about.
He's afraid of them? Can he not protect himself? Does he not have protection? Does he control a crime fighting force or not? Can he effect arrests or not? Better to let them continue happily victimising children? This seems like a situation where perfection is the enemy of good. Sorry. Im one of the people that cant logic bypass this element of the secret plan. We wouldnt talk about it openly if it were actually secret.
One of the ways they protect the President is with disinfo. This is why we have to be aware of 5G warfare.
You say fear. I imply intelligence. You know better than the military? (You might be on the wrong forum. I suggest The Donald.)
The person in the jail cell was wearing a Mission Impossible style mask of Jeffrey Epstein.
Feels likely Epstein is alive, but status of custody is anyone’sguess
A great article to read. Thank you for sharing.
To love ones enemy is the hardest part in all this.
God doesn't need us out there administering justice on his behalf. To do violence in God's name when told explicitly not to, isn't a good thing at all. It's self indulgence masked as servitude.
Rightousness in God is what is needed to serve God. Not self rightousness, God doesn't need any of that.
We can't serve God while ignoring key commandments or justifying them away.
With empahsis on "Thou Shall Not Kill", and "Love Thy Enemy".
Amen! & Amen!
God also allows wishing death on the enemies who are evil satan representatives
My research says the opposite actually.
I referenced Proverbs 24 for starters but if you have a verse to reference I'm intrigued about this interpretation.
I thought we are supposed to trust in God and who are we to know what or when his punishment will be? Praying the evil come to God and repent, not praying for their death? Perhaps Praying for swift judgemnt maybe, but not death. We can't know what that judgement will be. (Maybe death is letting them off the hook too easy in God's eyes.)
There's no need to plot violence or wish it apon the evil people because judgement is coming. We're to focus on love and repentance. Vengence is a distraction and more akin to self righteousness we're warned about.
Psalm 139:19
Indirect
Calls for God to punish those
Psalm 109:8-9 (NKJV): “Let his days be few, and let another take his office. Let his children be fatherless, and his wife a widow.”
I found this very interesting. Thank you for sharing.
https://thebiblesays.com/en/commentary/psa+139:19
While not directly telling God to kill them, David was just hating what God hates.
This analysis mentions David is careful in his words and some references to what Jesus said on the topic in Romans, which I think is where I was coming from. David's very sensitive to not be self righteous.
I understand your comment now about "Indirect"
/cheers
The more direct verse:
Psalm 109:8-9 (NKJV):
“Let his days be few, and let another take his office. Let his children be fatherless, and his wife a widow.”
Agency Intel assets usually have cover names. "Jeffrey Epstein" killed himself because he killed his cover name and most likely switched to a different name when he went underground with the White Hats. I think on that level, Kash and Bongino are being truthful. It's not a lie, per se, it's a truth "from a certain point of view."
IMO If Epstein isnt dead and still is alive its because the white hats want it that way. You figure he may have been and still is supplying info to round up all the bad guys behind closed doors and providing testimony in the court system. Think sealed indictments. He may have made a deal to save his life but stay behind bars protected from the black hats. Its the only thing that makes sense to me.
will his testimony or information be admissable when it comes time for trial if he was pronounced dead? no. no is the answer.
What’s the hold up 🙄?
Tear the shit down so they don’t got time to respond
Yup. Those two aren't good liars, which is a good thing. And wasn't there a picture/video of Epstein moving or something as they were wheeling him into the ambulance?
Naw he’s gone. Why? Why keep him alive. Dead men tell no tales.