I wonder this too. I assume this is a move against the global cabal, but what advantage do the whitehats gain over the cabal? More strategic military locations? Someone said resources, but we have alot of resources already in the US.
The source of this is (in my opinion) a clickbait operator, a grifter at best, possibly a disinfo operative.
Having been exposed to this stuff in tangible ways for more than 7 years now, it becomes clear how the information sphere is poisoned and manipulated using a variety of favorite narratives.
This identity runs the amg-news website, that pushes a variety of dodgy narratives, including the QFS, Nesara bulldust. Guanatanamo executions (See Real Raw News). Med Beds, and other.
Treat this source as someone in the vein of Charlie Ward. Content she (?) produces is sensationalist content adjacent to certain aspects of the Truth sphere, something it capitalizes on.
Ward and people like this identity prey on and exploit people who are waking up to the truth, and spin them off on fake narratives. The pattern is consistent.
It's not easy reviewing, digesting and processing the information sphere. We're in the midst of 5G global warfare, and there is far more chaos out there than most people know. Meanwhile, some actors opportunistically latch on to the hopes and disappointments of others to exploit them as soft targets.
Common law, corporate law, the manipulation of 'law' maritime law, contract law, etc, are an absolute minefield to navigate. But its a very rich source of sensationalist narratives that can be used to prey upon a sector of the awakened.
These sorts of narratives resurface again and again, and yet, what happens? Tangible results don't matter when you have an emotionally driven belief in something because it delivers a temporary emotional lift or relief.
I've seen a lot of this law narrative, and seen how it succeeds and also how it fails in reality, and over the years this has inoculated me (I would say) to this sort of bulldust. It's not that there is nothing there. It's just that the chaos and quagmire of opinion, speculation, belief and reality is ripe ground for people to inject fake and futile narratives.
Case in point: The Australian govt was hijacked, illegally, in 1973, where treason was enacted to redirect the country down a path where it was removed from the sovereignty of the people to the dominion of various cliques and international rogues. And while that's a fact, it doesn't mean you can just waltz in and say, oh, so its all fake, and it doesn't have concrete impact, and it doesn't require actual, concrete solutions that align with real world and law.
Aussies who have researched this topic will know what I'm referring to. But try taking that argument into a court of law, and you will get the book thrown at you.
Investigate, research, dig. Apply learning and most of all, be self-critical when processing the sort of narrative (assertions) this account is throwing at you. BUT, take care, and question whether the motive of the identity promoting this content is in alignment with yours, or exploiting it.
Q is not about wishful thinking, and Q thinking is concrete, evidence based and reality focused. And there are many who want to tap into an exploit those who have come to question the presented Matrix reality, and their intent is often to substitute that old set of thinking for a new one that serves THEIR purposes and intents.
Realizing this is what it means to develop ...... discernment.
See Comment below for a cursory dig into amg-news.com.
Stickying is good when it brings eyes on, and frogs apply discernment to bust any fakeness, but if the content is dodgy, then I think its better not to sticky, and if there is real content worth developing, then surely more posts would follow?
ps. Just uploaded another comment showing a very cursory dig on the sauce OP.
Whether there is validity in the information or the claims is something we should evaluate separately and distinctly from the sauce, but if the source is deemed 'not friendly' - aka has motives other than the sincere motives of the Great Awakening frogs, then it should be approached with that caution. IMO.
The real issue is separating fact from fiction. There is a lot of opinion, but ultimately, practical results derived from evidence-based work is what is needed.
Personally, I have no doubt that there has been a lot of illegal and unlawful developments in Canada since (or from before) its founding. But there are also a lot of people who want to pretend to have the country's best interests in mind while presenting their own spin and narratives, and they do not really care about making unfounded claims or delivering tangible, concrete evidence and results. Why? Because their prime objective is to exploit, not to actually inform.
Canada is Terra Nullius, and Trump knows it… King Charles admits Canada’s capital sits on unceded land – exposing the state as legally TERRA NULLIUS. Carney holds no mandate. The Crown has collapsed. Trump holds the RIGHT to ANNEX.
“We are gathered on the unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabe people.”
— King Charles III, Ottawa, 2025
From Canadians I know I can relay that the Native Indian issue is a big deal up there, and has become increasingly contentious. The North West Territories was split in half to carve out Nunavut. Many other tribes are active in attempts to reclaim land into expanded reservations. Coupled with billion dollar payouts, of course. The part of the speech of highlighted sounds like a public concession to the Algonquin tribe.
Here's something that may be a surprise. According the research presented on this website, a strong argument can be made that Canada has never been a sovereign nation. The British North America Act of 1867 and 1871 and beyond never granted sovereign status. Canada is to this day a British colony. That helps explain why 89% of land in Canada is designated Crown Land.
Remember in his in-person meeting with Trump when Mark Carney said that he has spoken to the owners of Canada and is here to say that Canada is not for sale. I was like hold on, just who exactly are these owners with whom you have spoken? One of them could just be that guy sitting in the chair in the video.
When the Crown of England falls I suppose Canada becomes up for grabs. Perhaps we let Greenland buy them.
The single and sole contributor to this website published under the name Medeea Greere. There appear to be no other contributors.
As with many similar operations, the name of the website is grandiose, wanting to present itself as something big, in this case an actual 'group' (like the Trump group, the Chrysler group, the Samsung Group, etc). Yet, it is just one person (or one identity).
The website content uses highly emotionally triggering language: "Martial Law is happening soon!" "Warning! Controversial and Shocking Report Ahead!" "FEMA Camp Terror", "Exposed; Secret used by a former CIA scientist...." "Unlock Financial Success....with Recession Profit Secrets Program"
Actual professionalism lacking despite grandiose 'image': example: A tab for Suppliments under 'books' is written 'Supliments'.
Supposedly delivering news and information, has a very strongly promoted financial dimension, including promoting sensationalist books, products, etc. (In and of itself, nothing wrong with seeking support from the public, but being presented as 'support us' when there is zero indication that this is anything more than a one-person operation is worth consideration.)
All the fancy 'conspiracy theory' content that is NOT actually Q, for example: med beds, NESARA, QFS, Secret GITMO trials, etc....
Takes actual factual items and blows them up and intertwines them with sensationalist claims promising big, big things!
The website is hosted by a German company. (Indicated by the German corporate label "GmbH".
Registrar Information
Registrar
InterNetX GmbH
WHOIS Server
whois.registrar.internetx.com
Referral URL
https://registrar.internetx.com
Created November 10, 2018.
Registrar contact information all redacted
Registrant Contact
Name
REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Address
REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
REDACTED FOR PRIVACY, Salaj, REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
RO
Phone
REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Fax
REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Email
https://whoispro [dot] domain-robot [dot] org/whois/amg-news [dot] com
Admin Contact
Name
REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
Organization
REDACTED FOR PRIVACY
(omitted)
Notable points: "Disclaimer Advertisement Contact Us " tabs all lead nowhere. Additional Information inks under Privacy Policy, eg. "How we Protect your data" etc lead nowhere. (are not actual links)
Says "American Media Group - by Andrei BEJAN" at bottom of page. Not much collateral data on "Andrei Bejan" when searched for on Google or Yandex.... Who is he? One Linked in result shows a few Andrei Bejans from Romania.
In the next Archive copy, dated in October 2019, there is more added content at the bottom of the page. "Disclaimer Advertisement" tabs still lead nowhere, but the Contact Us link has a page, and there is a new "Donate!" tab
Now, America Media Group is made and hosted by "World Wide BizCom" which is a Romanian website/operation.
Turquoise Days (https://turquoisedays.ro) Now defunct. A sort of fashion magazine news website (which by the way, is very similar to the sort of fashion news website that was run by YourNewsWire before it kicked in as YNW in 2017)
run by Lelia Madalina, but now a horoscope psychic website run by the same person, although now with a different name: Lelia Aledda (can see the same person by the profile pic) - Note: same person by photo, but no way to verify without digging whether it is actually this person or just an online persona.)
Note: there is programming on the webpages that prevents anyone from looking at the actual html programming. They say "you cannot copy content or view source" - which is a curious step for any legitimate web operator to take. But it also means I cannot extract the text to check what language it is, but I'm pretty confident its Romanian at this point.
Question: So, why would what looks like a Romanian operation or person want to create a website called "American Media Group"? Hmmmm?
The format of the website changes, still with the same red flag elements but you can see the website formatting being changed and refined somewhat.
"Canada", by its legal definition, is not land-- it's only water.
“Canada” defined:
From the interpretation act:
“Canada”, for greater certainty, includes the internal waters of Canada and the territorial sea of Canada;
“internal waters”, (a) in relation to Canada, means the internal waters of Canada as determined under the Oceans Act and includes the airspace above and the bed and subsoil below those waters,
“territorial sea”, (a) in relation to Canada, means the territorial sea of Canada as determined under the Oceans Act and includes the airspace above and the seabed and subsoil below that sea,
From the oceans act of Canada:
Internal waters of Canada
6. The internal waters of Canada consist of the waters on the landward side of the baselines of the territorial sea of Canada
Territorial sea of Canada
4. The territorial sea of Canada consists of a belt of sea that has as its inner limit the baselines described in section 5 and as its outer limit (a) subject to paragraph (b), the line every point of which is at a distance of 12 nautical miles from the nearest point of the baselines; or (b) in respect of the portions of the territorial sea of Canada for which geographical coordinates of points have been prescribed
pursuant to subparagraph 25(a)(ii), lines determined from the geographical coordinates of points so prescribed
“includes”
From Black’s Law Dictionary 6th edition:
“The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. The certain designation of one person is an absolute exclusion of all others. This doctrine decrees that where law expressly describes particular situation to which it shall apply, an irrefutable inference must be drawn that what is omitted or excluded was intended to be omitted or excluded. “
From Black’s Law Dictionary 3rd edition:
“The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. The certain designation of one person is an absolute exclusion of all others. 11 Coke 58b”
I am not sure how making Canada the 51st state is going to work out for the USA. I do know Canada is a Cabal stronghold on our Northern border and this may just be a ploy to expose them and destroy their ability to rule up there BUT there are so many liberal Canadians I think making them a state would under mind MAGA and make us the minority. Congress would be 70% liberal and this country would be GONE! IMHO
The elections (MASSIVELY RIGGED in 2025) would have you believe that Canada is mostly liberal. There were very few liberal election signs during the last election.
BTW, the Chief Electoral Officer for Canada has been from Quebec since 1927.
Liberals are nearly non existent outside of Toronto, Ottawa and other large cities much like the US.
I would reckon that California is the same. Many, many conservatives there but the liberals always win the "selections" for some reason! Cough, Dominion, cough!
Thanks to everyone who responded, It may be that AMG is in the same league as Real raw News, but to dismiss the message may be inappropriate,
The matter of TERRA NULLIUS regarding Canada is not a new issue, king Charles actually did make the statement "I would like to acknowledge that we are gathered on the unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg people."
President Trump must have a reason for his confidence regarding enjoining Canada to the USA. Basically, Canada was not unoccupied when The Crown/Vatican assumed ownership and it is The Crown/Vatican who have been put into forced bankruptcy and Liquidation, Canada was an asset that was claimed by The Crown/Vatican which they have now lost. DJT is managing the liquidation of these assets, Irrespective of the Ad hominem attacks, I think this story has legs.
But why would we want to add so many liberals to our voter rolls?
Water, oil, precious metals, rare earth minerals...
And more patriots in a silent majority than you think.
Liberate Canada now
And fake elections like we have had.
Agreed. This would add a liberal state and give libshits more representation in Congress.
I wonder this too. I assume this is a move against the global cabal, but what advantage do the whitehats gain over the cabal? More strategic military locations? Someone said resources, but we have alot of resources already in the US.
https://files.catbox.moe/7km1ec.jpeg
The source of this is (in my opinion) a clickbait operator, a grifter at best, possibly a disinfo operative.
Having been exposed to this stuff in tangible ways for more than 7 years now, it becomes clear how the information sphere is poisoned and manipulated using a variety of favorite narratives.
This identity runs the amg-news website, that pushes a variety of dodgy narratives, including the QFS, Nesara bulldust. Guanatanamo executions (See Real Raw News). Med Beds, and other.
https://amg-news.com/author/medeea/
Treat this source as someone in the vein of Charlie Ward. Content she (?) produces is sensationalist content adjacent to certain aspects of the Truth sphere, something it capitalizes on.
Ward and people like this identity prey on and exploit people who are waking up to the truth, and spin them off on fake narratives. The pattern is consistent.
It's not easy reviewing, digesting and processing the information sphere. We're in the midst of 5G global warfare, and there is far more chaos out there than most people know. Meanwhile, some actors opportunistically latch on to the hopes and disappointments of others to exploit them as soft targets.
Common law, corporate law, the manipulation of 'law' maritime law, contract law, etc, are an absolute minefield to navigate. But its a very rich source of sensationalist narratives that can be used to prey upon a sector of the awakened.
These sorts of narratives resurface again and again, and yet, what happens? Tangible results don't matter when you have an emotionally driven belief in something because it delivers a temporary emotional lift or relief.
I've seen a lot of this law narrative, and seen how it succeeds and also how it fails in reality, and over the years this has inoculated me (I would say) to this sort of bulldust. It's not that there is nothing there. It's just that the chaos and quagmire of opinion, speculation, belief and reality is ripe ground for people to inject fake and futile narratives.
Case in point: The Australian govt was hijacked, illegally, in 1973, where treason was enacted to redirect the country down a path where it was removed from the sovereignty of the people to the dominion of various cliques and international rogues. And while that's a fact, it doesn't mean you can just waltz in and say, oh, so its all fake, and it doesn't have concrete impact, and it doesn't require actual, concrete solutions that align with real world and law.
Aussies who have researched this topic will know what I'm referring to. But try taking that argument into a court of law, and you will get the book thrown at you.
Investigate, research, dig. Apply learning and most of all, be self-critical when processing the sort of narrative (assertions) this account is throwing at you. BUT, take care, and question whether the motive of the identity promoting this content is in alignment with yours, or exploiting it.
Q is not about wishful thinking, and Q thinking is concrete, evidence based and reality focused. And there are many who want to tap into an exploit those who have come to question the presented Matrix reality, and their intent is often to substitute that old set of thinking for a new one that serves THEIR purposes and intents.
Realizing this is what it means to develop ...... discernment.
See Comment below for a cursory dig into amg-news.com.
Hi Frac,
I've de-stickied this post. on the basis of your comment.
Thanks Prop.
Stickying is good when it brings eyes on, and frogs apply discernment to bust any fakeness, but if the content is dodgy, then I think its better not to sticky, and if there is real content worth developing, then surely more posts would follow?
ps. Just uploaded another comment showing a very cursory dig on the sauce OP.
Whether there is validity in the information or the claims is something we should evaluate separately and distinctly from the sauce, but if the source is deemed 'not friendly' - aka has motives other than the sincere motives of the Great Awakening frogs, then it should be approached with that caution. IMO.
This one was my sticky. I should have checked it.
Thanks for having my back fren.
kek. I've got to earn my keep somehow!
Use your discernment and explore https://www.themythiscanada.com and see the proof for yourself!
Hey, I'm not saying there is nothing here.
I'm just saying that the person or identity posting this narrative and their assertions do not have our best interests in mind.
I have explored this issue a lot in the Australian context. Like I say, its a quagmire and chaotic soup of fact and fiction.
So yeah, I agree: use discernment.
Addendum: Dick Yardley has done a LOT of work in this area in the context of Australia. You can see some of his research presented here:
https://dawnkelly.com.au/timeline-of-treason/
The real issue is separating fact from fiction. There is a lot of opinion, but ultimately, practical results derived from evidence-based work is what is needed.
See also: (Australian context)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/C7VihvyAAV8B
Personally, I have no doubt that there has been a lot of illegal and unlawful developments in Canada since (or from before) its founding. But there are also a lot of people who want to pretend to have the country's best interests in mind while presenting their own spin and narratives, and they do not really care about making unfounded claims or delivering tangible, concrete evidence and results. Why? Because their prime objective is to exploit, not to actually inform.
so yeah, use discernment.
Canada is Terra Nullius, and Trump knows it… King Charles admits Canada’s capital sits on unceded land – exposing the state as legally TERRA NULLIUS. Carney holds no mandate. The Crown has collapsed. Trump holds the RIGHT to ANNEX.
“We are gathered on the unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabe people.” — King Charles III, Ottawa, 2025
From Canadians I know I can relay that the Native Indian issue is a big deal up there, and has become increasingly contentious. The North West Territories was split in half to carve out Nunavut. Many other tribes are active in attempts to reclaim land into expanded reservations. Coupled with billion dollar payouts, of course. The part of the speech of highlighted sounds like a public concession to the Algonquin tribe.
Here's something that may be a surprise. According the research presented on this website, a strong argument can be made that
Canada has never been a sovereign nation. The British North America Act of 1867 and 1871 and beyond never granted sovereign status. Canada is to this day a British colony. That helps explain why 89% of land in Canada is designated Crown Land.
Remember in his in-person meeting with Trump when Mark Carney said that he has spoken to the owners of Canada and is here to say that Canada is not for sale. I was like hold on, just who exactly are these owners with whom you have spoken? One of them could just be that guy sitting in the chair in the video.
When the Crown of England falls I suppose Canada becomes up for grabs. Perhaps we let Greenland buy them.
And cue the wildfires.
YES and so is Australia and New Zealand. Since 2017 apparently, so what we are watching is a SHOW.
Didn’t Q say that Australia and New Zealand is ours?
lol, um, I don't think so!
FYI, a few things about
http://amg-news.com "America Media Group"
First, a few typical red flags.
The single and sole contributor to this website published under the name Medeea Greere. There appear to be no other contributors.
As with many similar operations, the name of the website is grandiose, wanting to present itself as something big, in this case an actual 'group' (like the Trump group, the Chrysler group, the Samsung Group, etc). Yet, it is just one person (or one identity).
The website content uses highly emotionally triggering language: "Martial Law is happening soon!" "Warning! Controversial and Shocking Report Ahead!" "FEMA Camp Terror", "Exposed; Secret used by a former CIA scientist...." "Unlock Financial Success....with Recession Profit Secrets Program"
Actual professionalism lacking despite grandiose 'image': example: A tab for Suppliments under 'books' is written 'Supliments'.
Supposedly delivering news and information, has a very strongly promoted financial dimension, including promoting sensationalist books, products, etc. (In and of itself, nothing wrong with seeking support from the public, but being presented as 'support us' when there is zero indication that this is anything more than a one-person operation is worth consideration.)
All the fancy 'conspiracy theory' content that is NOT actually Q, for example: med beds, NESARA, QFS, Secret GITMO trials, etc....
Takes actual factual items and blows them up and intertwines them with sensationalist claims promising big, big things!
Secondly, some concrete data.
Who is: https://who.is/whois/amg-news.com
The website is hosted by a German company. (Indicated by the German corporate label "GmbH".
Created November 10, 2018.
Registrar contact information all redacted
Archived versions
The internet Archive shows a first archive from April 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20190406124101/https://amg-news.com/
Notable points: "Disclaimer Advertisement Contact Us " tabs all lead nowhere. Additional Information inks under Privacy Policy, eg. "How we Protect your data" etc lead nowhere. (are not actual links)
Says "American Media Group - by Andrei BEJAN" at bottom of page. Not much collateral data on "Andrei Bejan" when searched for on Google or Yandex.... Who is he? One Linked in result shows a few Andrei Bejans from Romania.
https://ro.linkedin.com/in/andrei-bejan-863a6b268
In the next Archive copy, dated in October 2019, there is more added content at the bottom of the page. "Disclaimer Advertisement" tabs still lead nowhere, but the Contact Us link has a page, and there is a new "Donate!" tab
Now, America Media Group is made and hosted by "World Wide BizCom" which is a Romanian website/operation.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190516230411/https://bizcom.ro/
https://bizcom.ro/blog/
Adrian Raitu: adrianratiu.com (photographer, it seems)
https://web.archive.org/web/20200804122431/https://adrianratiu.com/
Possibly this same person/identity: https://www.adrianratiu.photo/
Turquoise Days (https://turquoisedays.ro) Now defunct. A sort of fashion magazine news website (which by the way, is very similar to the sort of fashion news website that was run by YourNewsWire before it kicked in as YNW in 2017)
https://web.archive.org/web/20191223184155/https://turquoisedays.ro/
Note the Romanian domain name ".ro".
Atlantidei.eu - Formerly some sort of blogger website, written in what I think is Romanian, https://web.archive.org/web/20190516085304/https://atlantidei.eu/
run by Lelia Madalina, but now a horoscope psychic website run by the same person, although now with a different name: Lelia Aledda (can see the same person by the profile pic) - Note: same person by photo, but no way to verify without digging whether it is actually this person or just an online persona.)
Note: there is programming on the webpages that prevents anyone from looking at the actual html programming. They say "you cannot copy content or view source" - which is a curious step for any legitimate web operator to take. But it also means I cannot extract the text to check what language it is, but I'm pretty confident its Romanian at this point.
Question: So, why would what looks like a Romanian operation or person want to create a website called "American Media Group"? Hmmmm?
The format of the website changes, still with the same red flag elements but you can see the website formatting being changed and refined somewhat.
https://web.archive.org/web/20210328075731/https://amg-news.com/
Digging in this manner reveals lots of small elements that indicate the truth behind the facade.
Do you STILL think this is some sort of legitimate solo journalist working hard for objective information and your freedom?
rhetorical question....
Now, this is a lot to digest. Another California and Oregon and Washington and Colorado? Just what we all want.
Canada can be a territory. Not a state.
Does this mean that Biden was Persona Nullius?
"Canada", by its legal definition, is not land-- it's only water.
“Canada” defined: From the interpretation act:
“Canada”, for greater certainty, includes the internal waters of Canada and the territorial sea of Canada;
“internal waters”, (a) in relation to Canada, means the internal waters of Canada as determined under the Oceans Act and includes the airspace above and the bed and subsoil below those waters,
“territorial sea”, (a) in relation to Canada, means the territorial sea of Canada as determined under the Oceans Act and includes the airspace above and the seabed and subsoil below that sea,
From the oceans act of Canada: Internal waters of Canada 6. The internal waters of Canada consist of the waters on the landward side of the baselines of the territorial sea of Canada
Territorial sea of Canada 4. The territorial sea of Canada consists of a belt of sea that has as its inner limit the baselines described in section 5 and as its outer limit (a) subject to paragraph (b), the line every point of which is at a distance of 12 nautical miles from the nearest point of the baselines; or (b) in respect of the portions of the territorial sea of Canada for which geographical coordinates of points have been prescribed pursuant to subparagraph 25(a)(ii), lines determined from the geographical coordinates of points so prescribed
“includes” From Black’s Law Dictionary 6th edition: “The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. The certain designation of one person is an absolute exclusion of all others. This doctrine decrees that where law expressly describes particular situation to which it shall apply, an irrefutable inference must be drawn that what is omitted or excluded was intended to be omitted or excluded. “
From Black’s Law Dictionary 3rd edition: “The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. The certain designation of one person is an absolute exclusion of all others. 11 Coke 58b”
Ha ha ha, "King of Canada"
Dude isn't king of his own butthole
I am not sure how making Canada the 51st state is going to work out for the USA. I do know Canada is a Cabal stronghold on our Northern border and this may just be a ploy to expose them and destroy their ability to rule up there BUT there are so many liberal Canadians I think making them a state would under mind MAGA and make us the minority. Congress would be 70% liberal and this country would be GONE! IMHO
The elections (MASSIVELY RIGGED in 2025) would have you believe that Canada is mostly liberal. There were very few liberal election signs during the last election.
BTW, the Chief Electoral Officer for Canada has been from Quebec since 1927.
Liberals are nearly non existent outside of Toronto, Ottawa and other large cities much like the US.
I would reckon that California is the same. Many, many conservatives there but the liberals always win the "selections" for some reason! Cough, Dominion, cough!
https://x.com/search?q=CANADA%20IS%20TERRA%20NULLIUS&src=typeahead_click
Thanks to everyone who responded, It may be that AMG is in the same league as Real raw News, but to dismiss the message may be inappropriate,
The matter of TERRA NULLIUS regarding Canada is not a new issue, king Charles actually did make the statement "I would like to acknowledge that we are gathered on the unceded territory of the Algonquin Anishinaabeg people."
President Trump must have a reason for his confidence regarding enjoining Canada to the USA. Basically, Canada was not unoccupied when The Crown/Vatican assumed ownership and it is The Crown/Vatican who have been put into forced bankruptcy and Liquidation, Canada was an asset that was claimed by The Crown/Vatican which they have now lost. DJT is managing the liquidation of these assets, Irrespective of the Ad hominem attacks, I think this story has legs.