Require every pharmaceutical company advertisement to include 5-seconds of video input from a victim that has been harmed by that same prescription drug.
Victim: "Hi. I'm Daniel and since taking proclavixol, I lost a lung and remain on a ventilator to survive".
Advertiser: "Ask your doctor is Proclavixol is right for you".
Then we'll end up with more ads like the ones the FDA/CDC are putting out about smokers that died. One of the more recent ones that pissed me off was some woman who smoked throughout pregnancy and her baby was born prematurely and needed the NICU. She talks about smoking through pregnancy, and gives us a "tip". She opens the door to the incubator and says to talk into the incubator so your baby can hear you.
Why not just say "I have a tip. Don't smoke during pregnancy, dumbasses!"
I can just see a group of late millennials or early Gen Z writers trying to virtue-signal and make it about the baby not hearing the mother, rather than actually trying to stop the underlying issue.
I can’t wait! This would be the end of these ridiculous sports contracts for millions upon millions of dollars. No more big mouth liberal sports hacks spewing off Communist talking points.
That's what gets you? You can simply change the channel on those. Mine is the stupid walking, singing, and dancing commercials (with several different versions). They are on nearly every channel.
As we noted last week, the move would mark a sweeping shift in the U.S. advertising landscape, where pharmaceutical companies are among the largest spenders. Prescription drug brands accounted for roughly 13 percent of all ad spending on linear television in 2025, totaling approximately $2.18 billion so far this year, according to iSpot data. In 2024, the industry spent $3.4 billion on traditional TV ads between January and August alone, according to ad-tracking data.
Since 1997, when the Food and Drug Administration relaxed disclosure requirements for DTC ads, pharmaceutical companies have increasingly leaned on consumer advertising to drive demand. Under current rules, companies need only disclose a drug’s “most important” risks during commercials.
If that money goes away, so do the highly-paid stupid anchors like Anderson Cooper, or most of the Fox News anchors. Fox News reportedly gets 75% of its evening news revenue from pharma ads, per a 2024 interview with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
PLEASE PLEASE free us from the pharma brainwashing that the tv ads are. Programming all Americans to obsess over illness and depend upon endless and dangerous prescription drugs!
It's why I am going to cancel Dish, I have some Roku boxes and have 2 hooked up and just need to get one more installed. I figured the tv providers will be looking to raise prices when the tv stations have to charge more to cover their losses of pharma revenue.
Go to all 3 of these sites, put your zip code in, and find out how many Over-The-Air (OTA) channels you can get in your area for free, and which antenna they recommend. There are some places that can get 40 or 50 channels, while others (like where I live) can get 20-30 depending on antenna height and placement.
Note - those $20 flat plastic antennas can work if you have a lot of stations close-by but you are better off getting one of the bigger ones that is usually mounted outside somewhere. They lie on the ranges for those small cheap ones.
If you want to record TV from there, or have 4 tuners so you can watch throughout your house, get something like this (HDHomeRun):
Do it. I'm sick to fuck of all the TV ads with the dozens of dippy robot-people holding hands and striding joyfully down the street, singing and dancing about how awesome their life is on dangerous drugs—as a motor-mouth announcer spews a long list of horrific side effects at a speed that makes Emily Campagno sound like Susan Collins.
I have an idea.
Require every pharmaceutical company advertisement to include 5-seconds of video input from a victim that has been harmed by that same prescription drug.
Victim: "Hi. I'm Daniel and since taking proclavixol, I lost a lung and remain on a ventilator to survive".
Advertiser: "Ask your doctor is Proclavixol is right for you".
Then we'll end up with more ads like the ones the FDA/CDC are putting out about smokers that died. One of the more recent ones that pissed me off was some woman who smoked throughout pregnancy and her baby was born prematurely and needed the NICU. She talks about smoking through pregnancy, and gives us a "tip". She opens the door to the incubator and says to talk into the incubator so your baby can hear you.
Why not just say "I have a tip. Don't smoke during pregnancy, dumbasses!" I can just see a group of late millennials or early Gen Z writers trying to virtue-signal and make it about the baby not hearing the mother, rather than actually trying to stop the underlying issue.
That would be awesome. Would make people actually think for a second.
I can’t wait! This would be the end of these ridiculous sports contracts for millions upon millions of dollars. No more big mouth liberal sports hacks spewing off Communist talking points.
That's what gets you? You can simply change the channel on those. Mine is the stupid walking, singing, and dancing commercials (with several different versions). They are on nearly every channel.
I just recently noticed a line in that type of commercial that the people are compensated!
Probably with free drugs. kek
As we noted last week, the move would mark a sweeping shift in the U.S. advertising landscape, where pharmaceutical companies are among the largest spenders. Prescription drug brands accounted for roughly 13 percent of all ad spending on linear television in 2025, totaling approximately $2.18 billion so far this year, according to iSpot data. In 2024, the industry spent $3.4 billion on traditional TV ads between January and August alone, according to ad-tracking data.
Since 1997, when the Food and Drug Administration relaxed disclosure requirements for DTC ads, pharmaceutical companies have increasingly leaned on consumer advertising to drive demand. Under current rules, companies need only disclose a drug’s “most important” risks during commercials.
If that money goes away, so do the highly-paid stupid anchors like Anderson Cooper, or most of the Fox News anchors. Fox News reportedly gets 75% of its evening news revenue from pharma ads, per a 2024 interview with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KYmNc60suw&t=400s
PLEASE PLEASE free us from the pharma brainwashing that the tv ads are. Programming all Americans to obsess over illness and depend upon endless and dangerous prescription drugs!
sOuNdS LiKe yOu nEeD yOuR mEdS aDjUsTeD!
It's why I am going to cancel Dish, I have some Roku boxes and have 2 hooked up and just need to get one more installed. I figured the tv providers will be looking to raise prices when the tv stations have to charge more to cover their losses of pharma revenue.
Go to all 3 of these sites, put your zip code in, and find out how many Over-The-Air (OTA) channels you can get in your area for free, and which antenna they recommend. There are some places that can get 40 or 50 channels, while others (like where I live) can get 20-30 depending on antenna height and placement.
Note - those $20 flat plastic antennas can work if you have a lot of stations close-by but you are better off getting one of the bigger ones that is usually mounted outside somewhere. They lie on the ranges for those small cheap ones.
If you want to record TV from there, or have 4 tuners so you can watch throughout your house, get something like this (HDHomeRun):
and get their DVR subscription ($35/yr)
... or learn to setup ChannelsDVR and record to your own pc/server (which is what I did):
An apocalypse would be too good for the MSM.
Do it. I'm sick to fuck of all the TV ads with the dozens of dippy robot-people holding hands and striding joyfully down the street, singing and dancing about how awesome their life is on dangerous drugs—as a motor-mouth announcer spews a long list of horrific side effects at a speed that makes Emily Campagno sound like Susan Collins.
Bring back liquor ads to make up for it.
https://i.imgur.com/j1GwVIr.jpg
End it..
They managed when the gov prohibited cigarettes.
Banning them outright could bring lawsuits?
When was that the determing factor of doing the right thing?
The left's only weapon is lawsuits. Ban them.😁
They need to go, period. No excuses.