I killed Jesus

He wouldn't have allowed himself to go to the cross if it weren't for my sin. Because of the price he paid for me with his own blood, I am saved from eternity in hell and get to spend eternity with him in heaven.

Every follower of Jesus can make the same claim.

2000 years ago is roughly 80 generations. Roughly 40x the people alive today vs back then. We're all basically related to the people who killed Jesus at this point. And when you look at people within the same region, chances are there are many common ancestors going back that far.

yes, I think so. two different 'types' of people in this world, and there is enmity between them...

John 8:21-30

Dispute Over Who Jesus Is

21 Once more Jesus said to them, “I am going away, and you will look for me, and you will die in your sin. Where I go, you cannot come.”

22 This made the Jews ask, “Will he kill himself? Is that why he says, ‘Where I go, you cannot come’?”

23 But he continued, “You are from below; I am from above. You are of this world; I am not of this world.

24 I told you that you would die in your sins; if you do not believe that I am he, you will indeed die in your sins.”

25 “Who are you?” they asked. “Just what I have been telling you from the beginning,” Jesus replied.

26 “I have much to say in judgment of you. But he who sent me is trustworthy, and what I have heard from him I tell the world.”

27 They did not understand that he was telling them about his Father.

28 So Jesus said, “When you have lifted up[a] the Son of Man, then you will know that I am he and that I do nothing on my own but speak just what the Father has taught me.

29 The one who sent me is with me; he has not left me alone, for I always do what pleases him.”

30 Even as he spoke, many believed in him.

John Hopkins University did a DNA test on the people of israel. Less than 3% of the people of Israel had any original Hebrew blood in them and those that did had only about 1% of ancient Hebrew blood.

The people who were in power - that would be Augustus Ceasar. However the people who were responsible for the death would be the Pharisees and the other sect of Jewish people that would have been the lineage of the current day Banksters / Satanists.

In the series Mystery Babylon Bill Cooper has outlined the continuity of this Satanis occultists from the earliest days of Isis worship all the way through the Roman Empire, Templars, Rosecrucians, etc to the current day Cabal.

So I would say, very roughly speaking, the answer is Yes.

I would presume so. The same thing could be asked of the descendants of nazis. And that regime was in power much more recently.

John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. Looking at the people in world today, I would say the lineage is apparent and still exist

The so-called "elites" of today are not "jewish" genetically, they are eastern European ashkenazi, descended from the khazars, however the khazars were descended from edomites. The Pharisees were also edomites, in particular King Herod (who tried to kill baby Jesus) was an edomite. Whether the modern ashkenazi are descended of the pharisees that betrayed Jesus is a bit unknowable. The khazarian empire began in the 6th century, so there was plenty of time for that to be the case, but I've not seen anyone claim to have evidence to that effect. The khazars were defeated and forced to convert to an abrahamic religion by a Russian Czar, and they chose to be jewish because they were already Babylonian talmudic religiously, as they were edomites and so are the biblical "jews" that rejected christ (the "tradition of the elders" is the talmud). This suggests that the khazars were not already "jews", else they would not have needed to "convert" (can you really call converting from one talmudic religion to another a conversion?), which then logically implies that they could not have been directly related to the pharisees of Jesus' time. It's plausible, but I think unlikely- I think they were probably different branches of edomites which are not directly related through physical genetic lineage.

Jesus laid his own life down willingly and is alive today. Hallelujah!!!

1. if you go back far enough we all go back to the seed of Adam(the first man) 2) And since Adam was in a fallen state when he produced children (because of his sin) all that are born of Adam are born in a fallen state "EVERY SEED AFTER ITS OWN KIND"(Genesis 1:29). Just like you cannot take tomato seed, and produce corn, the seed of a fallen man cannot produce a righteous child, a spiritually dead man(which Adam was) cannot produce a spiritually alive child, he can only produce a child in the flesh. This is the reason Jesus said, "I tell you the truth you must be born again(John 3:3) BORN SPIRITUALLY, and is the reason Jesus went to the cross, to make that legally possible, enabling Christ to take our sin and give us his righteousness enabling us to be (now) born of Christ's seed, which is the word of God,(born again) with a new nature(fulfilling the prophecy and the promise of God found in Ezekiel 36:26) born anew with Christ's righteousness. The sin of mankind brought Christ to the cross, and since (we all have sinned) we all share(we are all responsible) for Christ's death on the cross, and in the same manner, if we receive and accept, his sacrificial death for our sin, we then share in his resurrection, an eternal life, born again with his nature, from His seed, which liveth and abideth forever.

KILLED* Jesus*

Do you mean the Romans? Or the Pharisees who conspired to get the Romans to kill Jesus?

Statistically speaking. Large numbers of people today are probably related to the Roman section of the equation. This part of the lineage in a round about fashion. The Jewish portion I’m less sure about as there’s other factors there. But it stands to reason a significant number of people on the earth today also bear some relation to them as well. Probably not as many as the Romans. But still significant.

Do you mean Herrods line? The imposed rulers set by Rhome?

First off, let me take this from a theological standpoint. It wasn't the Jews that killed Jesus. It wasn't the Romans. It was us. Part of the meaning of the whole story is that Humanity killed our Savior. No single individual or group did it. We did.

Second, you're not going to find any existing DNA lineages. After about 6 generations the contribution from an individual ancestor further back is statistically removed.

Third, there's probably nobody out there willing to advertise their affiliation with someone they hold responsible for the gig. You won't find Fred Iscariot on any mailboxes. Your kids won't go to school with the Pilate's kids.

However, William Harrod, a contemporary of Daniel Boone, did found Harrodsburg, Kentucky in 1774. I had his descendant living in one of my apartments back in the 1980s. Ya think?

Okay. Let's say you find Arnold P. Pilate living next door to you. Is he "part of the lineage?" Don't jump to conclusions. I quote from the history of Circleville, Ohio on Wikipedia:

" . . Circleville was founded by European-American settlers in 1810, as people relocated westward after the American Revolutionary War.[9]: 32–3  One such settler was George Hitler Sr., who migrated to Circleville in 1799 with his wife and 4 children, with seven more being born in Circleville after they resettled. One of these children, Dr. Gay Hitler, used to be a dentist. Numerous features of the town are named after this family, these being two 'Hitler' roads, Hubert Hitler Road, Hitler Pond, Hitler-Park, and Hitler-Ludvig cemetery.[10][11] There is no connection between the family and Adolf Hitler, whose surname was defined much later."

BTW: the George Hitler mentioned is actually George Washington Hitler. Gay Hitler stopped practicing dentistry in 1946.