The medical community is unfortunately full of those egos who pat themselves on the back for writing on a prescription pad. Because they don’t know their patients, they have no idea if they are coming back, and it’s no big deal to them if they don’t. If the patient doesn’t get well it’s the patients fault not them. What happens when you take no responsibility for the outcome of your treatment? Nothing changes patient get ticked off and never comes back. They seek treatment elsewhere. After $1000’s with no relief you look for alternative medicine, when that doesn’t work you look inward, you seek and you pray. Then one day God answers your prayers puts the answers in front of you and you get fully healed.

A little over 3 weeks ago, I had a heart attack. Now I've had a CID implanted. At the hospital, (I had to go to a bigger city to get the procedure) I stated to various staff that insurance needs to be removed from medicine. If course the typical response was, how are you going to pay for all of this? My response was remove insurance, and prices will drop due to the market dictating cost. I don't think any of them really understood the concept.

all that and they never mention the culprits

embarrassing

The DSM is a sham and was never meant to be medicalized.

There are no biological markers that identify most mental disorders, there are only a few disorders that have a clear biological cause which are called organic disorders.

Psychiatry doesn't work the same as main stream medicine. In main stream medicine a name will only be ratified as indicating a physical disorder only after it's been discovered in the body. Psychiatry works in the opposite way, it names a disorder before any pathological roots have been discovered. This means a new medical disorder can make its way into the DSM and become part of our wider culture even though there is no biological evidence to support its inclusion.

So what grounds do mental disorders or evidence supports their inclusion.. biasically if a large enough number of doctors feel it's important... they just add it. Basically, they just agreed it should be in there. Agreement does not constitute scientific proof.

Here's an example. Professor Paula J Caplan (Harvard Kennedy School) scrutinized the research used to justify including SDPD in the DSM. This is what she found out...

In spitzer's research, a group pf psychiatrists at only one university, who already accepted SDPD existed, were shown some very old case studies. All then unanimously agreed the patients in them had SDPD. Caplan pointed out that just because some psychiatrists at one hospital all diagnosed their patients with SDPD, was not proof that the disorder actually exists. All it proves is that a group of psychiatrists working in the same institution gave the same label - rightly or wrongly - to a given set of behaviors.

From Theodore Millon (an American psychologist known for his work on personality disorders); “There was very little systematic research and much of the research that existed was really a hodgepodge - scattered, inconsistent, and ambiguous. I think the majority of us recognized that the amount of good, solid science upon which we were making our decisions was pretty modest.”

Yet, we have big pharma creating medication to treat these....

End pharmaceutical industry control over medical education.

End affirmative action in medicine, it is worse than you can imagine.

End MBA educated hospital administration, it shouldn’t be run as a profit center that denies care in order to generate profits.

End foreign outsourcing of medicine. Areas like radiology shouldn’t take 24 hour turn around because you want to reduce cost and delay care.

Normalize M.D. pay rates, a dermatologist shouldn’t make more than most other specialties. In order to be a good family care or internal medicine physician, you have to know 95% of everything, and they are the gatekeepers to the other specialties. Instead, your primary care physicians are treated like a commodity that has to operate on seeing 50+ patients a day. This makes it impossible to properly gain knowledge on a patient. God forbid you have more than 2 or 3 issues, because that is all that is getting addressed.

This is all without taking into account AI, because the way the software works now, it takes labs and input from the physician in and then forces the pharmaceutical treatment, dictated by insurance. If that’s the case, a patient comes in, writes down what they think is wrong, labs are taken and entered, and then AI diagnosis will be just as good, and maybe better, than most of the physicians out there.

Medicine is broken. How many of you have noticed just how bad it has become in the last 2-4 years?

Destroy medical care, treat it like a typical business model, have lower educated or capable physicians, pharmacists, nurses, and you have way more control.

It is another facet of the debt slavery system in this country.

Looking at that data I conclude that from 2022 on most autistic children will children of Democrats. (Of course I doubt the Democratic party will exist much longer)

Ask yourself why there's so many fast food restaurants and urgent care centers in such convenient locations.

I listen to a lot of keto/carnivore doctors podcasts. There is NO real evidence dietary cholesterol causes heart issues. That “low fat craze” was a made up lie paid for by cereal companies.
They keep lowering the standard for cholesterol to sell statins.

Cholesterol is present in damaged arteries so they blame cholesterol for the damage. It’s like blaming firefighters for the fire.

I dropped extra weight and doubled my testosterone on a very low carb/ high fat diet. Fat regulates hormones. Many now have healed years of damage using keto/carnivore.

Seems most of the metabolic diseases can be cured by diet. That would put the medical buzzards out of business.