But what are they hiding them for? When I was looking into that one, the evidence for it is weak, obviously. However, the circumstantial evidence for a cover-up was so overwhelming that it made me a believer. What it makes me wonder is what downstream revelations would public acknowledgement lead to? Changing history books, and acknowledgement that many natives across the Americas weren't lying doesn't seem worth the effort and long-term risk, you know?
Fomenko's chronology suggests that the century we're living in was distorted around the Renaissance. The "selection" of the year came almost entirely down to one person, at the behest of the Vatican. Afaik the Fomenko guys have proven this by counting moon cycles and planetary positions
It's similar / related to the whole "terraria/mudflood" idea. Essentially those suggest that there was a global civilization that existed based on shared principles of architecture. The Electric Universe theorists and mini Ice Age researchers suggest that there was some type of either glacial melting or solar storm that caused mass flooding and wiped out the network of that old world.
Going further (still trying to patchwork all of this stuff together with people of course), there's also the Hydroplate Theory, which suggests (in agreement with the EU guys) that water is created deep in/under the mantle, which led to a massive underground ocean. The singular crust of the earth cracked at one point due to strain or an asteroid/meteor hitting, and ruptured the crust (at first in the Atlantic) causing what's referred to as the Flood.
Fomenko's chronology, Tartaria/old world architecture, planetary cataclysm, World fairs, etc... all point to various "resets" where the survivors sought power to retake the world in the recovery phase. If there's any consistent/predictable timing to these cataclysms, it's very likely that the elites retreated during these periods only to come out and dominate the confused surviving populations
Got carried away there laying out the required patchwork of theories, but as regards giants and the such... The water from the Hydroplate Theory event is suggested to have had a higher quantity of Deuterium in it, which could've slowly corrupted / affected the telomerase, shortening lifespan, shrinking humans, etc.
An other possibly relevant theory which I haven't yet gone deep enough into yet is Archaix's "vapor canopy" theory where the atmosphere completely shifts into some higher oxygen composition, meaning metabolism changes and possibly giants form from the young experiencing completely different air, food, light, etc over generations.
Eh food for thought. The vapor canopy idea is still "cataclysmic" so it's worth hiding by the elites, I'd guess.
And fabricates the bones of phake and ghey dinosaurs...
Nobody, no culture, no tribe, no nation in the history of the world ever discovered any dino bones until Charles Darwin's evolution pal invented them in the 1860s. After which, he and his buddies started discovering dino fossils all over the world.
You are quite correct. Boogeymen and cooties. All part of the mainstream materialistic agenda designed to generate fear and judgment resulting in victim consciousness which then leads us to give all our power away to the controlling rulers and their ordained "experts and authorities".....those you trust the most....are brainwashed into oblivion!
They did the same thing with Jefferson. Pointed out “he claimed to be against slavery” then rubbed his face in every slave he owned, as if he wasn’t forced to compete against slave labor when selling his crops.
They also don’t seem to care about buying products made with Chinese slave labor now. Well gosh how do you fix that? I know, tariffs! “REEEE those are evil and don’t work!”
Or about the open sex slave trade in the Middle East, that’s happening now. “Did Trump buy any of them? Otherwise you’re probably making it up.”
Funny how they’re always fighting to protect slave labor, then accusing us of being the problem.
From what I have read, Jefferson inherited his slaves from his father-in-law (women in Virginia could not own property).
He was opposed to slavery, in principle, but it was illegal under Virginia law to set them free. However, it was not illegal to put in one's will that they could be set free upon the death of the slave owner.
That's what he planned to do. However, George Washington did that when he died, and right after that, Virginia passed a law making that illegal, as well. So, Jefferson could not even do that when he died.
So, Jefferson could either set them free, thus making himself a criminal, or keep them and do the best he could. He reasoned that even if he set them free, in the world that existed at the time, they would likely end up captured back into slavery again. Plus, many slaves WANTED to be slaves because they could not conceive of the idea of how they would live if they had freedom.
Couple of interesting quotes that have stuck in my mind:
When a slave sees a free man, he can think one of two thoughts: There is a free man, why am I not free like he is; or, there is a free man, why is he not a slave like me? -- Frederick Douglass
I could have freed more slaves, if only I could have convinced them that they were slaves. -- Harriet Tubman
Both quotes apply today, as well.
Re: Leftists not caring about real slavery today --
Right, because leftists do not care about ideas, concepts or principles. They only care about being seen by others as virtuous, even if it is a fake virtue.
I remember something a friend said to me many years ago:
Most people live their lives focused on (concerned about) what other people think about them, because they want to "fit in" (this is especially true for females and liberals); but the irony is that all those other people are so focused on what everyone else is thinking about THEM, that they don't have any time or any interest in thinking about anyone else.
I always looked at the Smithsonian like a giant black hole where history went to be hidden. Watching their TV channel is clearly them rewriting and blatantly misrepresenting history the way they choose. The thing that caught me off gaurd is Trumps reasoning for the audit was DEI practices. I thought that was odd, however, maybe just an angle to get in there. Maybe John Trump has a file or two along side Tesla ;-) I'd settle for them wheeling out one of them giant skulls for now.
Maybe they are the giant warehouse from the end of first Indiana Jones - boxing everything up and assuring people 'we have TOP men on it'. To bury everything never to be seen again.
Wow. I'm not surprised, but I am surprised their lies have been hidden for so long. I remember holding the Smithsonian in the highest esteem when I was young.
You would think that if the Smithsonian wanted to paint her as a racist, they could've done it in any of the dozen article they published so far just this year AFTER this lady said she turned down the offer in their magazine: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/tag/susan-b-anthony/
If you think this is the Smithsonian rewriting history, try looking into the Wright brothers and their 'deal' with the museum made just after their infamous flight.
Not to mention that the Smithsonian hides the bones of giants.
But what are they hiding them for? When I was looking into that one, the evidence for it is weak, obviously. However, the circumstantial evidence for a cover-up was so overwhelming that it made me a believer. What it makes me wonder is what downstream revelations would public acknowledgement lead to? Changing history books, and acknowledgement that many natives across the Americas weren't lying doesn't seem worth the effort and long-term risk, you know?
Fomenko's chronology suggests that the century we're living in was distorted around the Renaissance. The "selection" of the year came almost entirely down to one person, at the behest of the Vatican. Afaik the Fomenko guys have proven this by counting moon cycles and planetary positions
It's similar / related to the whole "terraria/mudflood" idea. Essentially those suggest that there was a global civilization that existed based on shared principles of architecture. The Electric Universe theorists and mini Ice Age researchers suggest that there was some type of either glacial melting or solar storm that caused mass flooding and wiped out the network of that old world.
Going further (still trying to patchwork all of this stuff together with people of course), there's also the Hydroplate Theory, which suggests (in agreement with the EU guys) that water is created deep in/under the mantle, which led to a massive underground ocean. The singular crust of the earth cracked at one point due to strain or an asteroid/meteor hitting, and ruptured the crust (at first in the Atlantic) causing what's referred to as the Flood.
Fomenko's chronology, Tartaria/old world architecture, planetary cataclysm, World fairs, etc... all point to various "resets" where the survivors sought power to retake the world in the recovery phase. If there's any consistent/predictable timing to these cataclysms, it's very likely that the elites retreated during these periods only to come out and dominate the confused surviving populations
Got carried away there laying out the required patchwork of theories, but as regards giants and the such... The water from the Hydroplate Theory event is suggested to have had a higher quantity of Deuterium in it, which could've slowly corrupted / affected the telomerase, shortening lifespan, shrinking humans, etc.
An other possibly relevant theory which I haven't yet gone deep enough into yet is Archaix's "vapor canopy" theory where the atmosphere completely shifts into some higher oxygen composition, meaning metabolism changes and possibly giants form from the young experiencing completely different air, food, light, etc over generations.
Eh food for thought. The vapor canopy idea is still "cataclysmic" so it's worth hiding by the elites, I'd guess.
Some of us haven't forgotten.
I didn't know this. I sure hope to see them soon.
What what? Rosie O’Donnell isn’t dead yet.
And fabricates the bones of phake and ghey dinosaurs...
Nobody, no culture, no tribe, no nation in the history of the world ever discovered any dino bones until Charles Darwin's evolution pal invented them in the 1860s. After which, he and his buddies started discovering dino fossils all over the world.
The more you know...
And they’ve never found a complete Dino fossil. Same viruses never being isolated
You are quite correct. Boogeymen and cooties. All part of the mainstream materialistic agenda designed to generate fear and judgment resulting in victim consciousness which then leads us to give all our power away to the controlling rulers and their ordained "experts and authorities".....those you trust the most....are brainwashed into oblivion!
No difference than the Aztec priests demanding worship and virgins for the sun to return. Doing this while hiding information about eclipse cycles.
Yep, there are no new tricks under the sun. Liars gonna lie and the gullible and naive gonna die...
Smithsonian: 'Call the woman who fought against slavery a r*cist or you're fired.'
This is what Trump meant - they're not teaching history, they're manufacturing propaganda.
https://x.com/DogbertDaily/status/1958186747264663731
They did the same thing with Jefferson. Pointed out “he claimed to be against slavery” then rubbed his face in every slave he owned, as if he wasn’t forced to compete against slave labor when selling his crops.
They also don’t seem to care about buying products made with Chinese slave labor now. Well gosh how do you fix that? I know, tariffs! “REEEE those are evil and don’t work!”
Or about the open sex slave trade in the Middle East, that’s happening now. “Did Trump buy any of them? Otherwise you’re probably making it up.”
Funny how they’re always fighting to protect slave labor, then accusing us of being the problem.
“Get thee behind me, Satan.”
Re: Jefferson --
From what I have read, Jefferson inherited his slaves from his father-in-law (women in Virginia could not own property).
He was opposed to slavery, in principle, but it was illegal under Virginia law to set them free. However, it was not illegal to put in one's will that they could be set free upon the death of the slave owner.
That's what he planned to do. However, George Washington did that when he died, and right after that, Virginia passed a law making that illegal, as well. So, Jefferson could not even do that when he died.
So, Jefferson could either set them free, thus making himself a criminal, or keep them and do the best he could. He reasoned that even if he set them free, in the world that existed at the time, they would likely end up captured back into slavery again. Plus, many slaves WANTED to be slaves because they could not conceive of the idea of how they would live if they had freedom.
Couple of interesting quotes that have stuck in my mind:
Both quotes apply today, as well.
Re: Leftists not caring about real slavery today --
Right, because leftists do not care about ideas, concepts or principles. They only care about being seen by others as virtuous, even if it is a fake virtue.
I remember something a friend said to me many years ago:
How the crap do we overcome that mindset? Excellent comment! u/#updoot
Emancipate yourself from mental slavery none but ourselves can free our minds - Marcus Garvey / Bob Marley
I meant in others. Many f’s not given, here - as long as the bad opinion isn’t for a good reason anyway.
… but since only we ourselves can do it, that applies to them as well.
Which would go back to spoon feeding and positive application of the Socratic method… ugh.
Yes. People who do the sins are always accusing others of the same.
I always looked at the Smithsonian like a giant black hole where history went to be hidden. Watching their TV channel is clearly them rewriting and blatantly misrepresenting history the way they choose. The thing that caught me off gaurd is Trumps reasoning for the audit was DEI practices. I thought that was odd, however, maybe just an angle to get in there. Maybe John Trump has a file or two along side Tesla ;-) I'd settle for them wheeling out one of them giant skulls for now.
Maybe they are the giant warehouse from the end of first Indiana Jones - boxing everything up and assuring people 'we have TOP men on it'. To bury everything never to be seen again.
Waiting. They are doing good.
Q referred to the Re Writing of History! Bring on the NEW age of ENLIGHTENMENT. Let,s start with Real History!
There has been so much of rewriting.
Susan B Anthony was a man, man!
What? Why?
Do a Google image search and let me know what you think. Side note: "She" looks like Rudy Giuliani, to me.
Oh. He looks like Fauci.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_B._Anthony
Yep, in that pic. Definitely looks like Fauci, kek
My first thought.
u/#bait
u/#dontcare
Kek
They also hide it. People find large human bones ,they come in and take it and then when peopl3 request to see them they claim to never have had them
Oh. Now that's the truth.
Wow. I'm not surprised, but I am surprised their lies have been hidden for so long. I remember holding the Smithsonian in the highest esteem when I was young.
Same here. We have been had.
You would think that if the Smithsonian wanted to paint her as a racist, they could've done it in any of the dozen article they published so far just this year AFTER this lady said she turned down the offer in their magazine: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/tag/susan-b-anthony/
Are you saying that woman lied about it?
Nooooo
If you think this is the Smithsonian rewriting history, try looking into the Wright brothers and their 'deal' with the museum made just after their infamous flight.
True.
Without subsidization it's incredibly difficult to get ROI on "green energy" equipment.
Howls. Now I know why I didn't go there.