They couldn't investigate it. Butler was just the cover story for what they were really doing that day; planning an actual attempt on Trump, just like with Kirk. Both knew they were being targeted, and spooked their assassins by theatrical surprise. That's the whole story here really I believe.
I don't think it's that unlikely that the deepstate could create a narrative on purpose that makes Trump look like a force against them, while actually being for them.
If Trump is the swamp he wouldn’t be able to post that article and would get a knock on his door already courtesy of the real swamp. And we would still be in covid lockdown with a million boosters lined up 😆
See I was willing to be more considerate of the theory of a "faked his death" argument or something similar up until I saw the last line of that article...
Okay so watching it and I'll admit there is some fuckery afoot.
The shooter is looking more like a patsy day by day. I couldn't read the text wall in the video but I've read some of his comments from news articles and yeah the oddities don't really make sense.
The rifle videos are compelling to say he didn't do it too, as there's no way for it to make sense.
As for the "it's a squib" argument, the best I've got is maybe. Some of the footage they show is quite compelling in that direction, like the artifact like bullet hole video, or the way the shirt is moving with no wound or armor in place.
The "it's coagulated one" though, that's weaker. The video used as proof ain't good quality to begin with tbh, and video is one thing I do know a little about. zooming on a low res moving image creates a terrible artifact effect which can make liquids look in part solid, like they are coagulated. I'll admit if it was an arterial spray that's not the image I'd expect, but the "it's coming from his shirt and not him" vids were slightly more convincing conceptually.
Now the post shooting carry and lack of blood at the crime scene? That's a little more convincing with me, but I'll Devils advocate. Can't explain the "there's no blood" at the shooting site, but the carrying around one? There are elements that can be devils advocated away. That said, the way it does seem to be run like an action scene from a film, and the way there's no blood drops and no obvious dressings of the wound... Well it is suspicious at least.
I still think there's too little good info though on wtf actually happened. They said Ashley babbit was a fake event due to a similar scenario, but everyone acts like she's dead too. True is we may never truly know before the film ends, and the conjecture and theories tend to lead people to question Trump more than question the enemy.
I'll admit, I thought the Babbit theory was nonsense till someone here posted that video analyzing all the footage. There are so many things that just don't make sense and it seems like actors in a movie.
been a supporter since 2014 when Trump was quote-tweeting my vaccine-autism tweets
but im also not blinded by love
if parents truly love their children, will the parents actually “see” or “catch” their child with his hand in the cookie jar?
or will the parents be so blinded by love that the child will successfully convince the parents that he was actually putting the cookie back in the cookie jar?
Kek. "Trump is the swamp."
Yeah, that's rubbish isn't it.
If Trump was the swamp, they'd like him more than they do.
They all played along with Butler shooting hoax instead of exposing it…
Very interesting point.
Personally I don't think for a second that that means Trump is part of the swamp, but it means something.
Theres new Erika Kirk rabbit hole emerging…
She was 2012 Miss Arizona, at a time when Trump owner Miss USA
Supposedly Trump introduced Erika to Charlie
Erika started a sketchy non-profit, which is swirling in rumors of mass kidnappings and human trafficking out of Romania
As crazy as that sounds
Of course the fact checkers are on high alert denying this story
Is it weird how some people have their own foundations, non-profits, etc?
How many people do you personally know who have their own foundation or their own nonprofit organization?
http://google.com/search?q=Erika+Kirk+Romanian+Angels+Trafficking
Hoax? Which part was a hoax.
They couldn't investigate it. Butler was just the cover story for what they were really doing that day; planning an actual attempt on Trump, just like with Kirk. Both knew they were being targeted, and spooked their assassins by theatrical surprise. That's the whole story here really I believe.
I strongly tend towards both events having an element of sting.
ie. I think the black hats planned the assassinations and the white hats scuppered it, but re-used the event for psyop plan purposes.
Somewhat like the pattern of J6
It's really complicated, but that's the world we're in.
I don't think it's that unlikely that the deepstate could create a narrative on purpose that makes Trump look like a force against them, while actually being for them.
That's really silly.
Why did Trump beat Hillary, a deep stater?
Why aren't we all locked down?
Why has WW3 been avoided so far?
There's a real battle between white hats and black hats, that bit isn't faked.
Well, the argument goes, you're easier to control when you believe you've won. Or at least you think that someone is fighting the fight with you.
We can't know for sure without a bird's eye view.
If Trump is the swamp he wouldn’t be able to post that article and would get a knock on his door already courtesy of the real swamp. And we would still be in covid lockdown with a million boosters lined up 😆
Absolutely the truth. He would not be targeted, just handled and controlled.
See I was willing to be more considerate of the theory of a "faked his death" argument or something similar up until I saw the last line of that article...
In my opinion, you need to watch the 19 minute video which is referred to and disregard unsupported conclusions in the article such as Trump-is-swamp.
https://x.com/benwehrman/status/1968829901554766164
Okay so watching it and I'll admit there is some fuckery afoot.
The shooter is looking more like a patsy day by day. I couldn't read the text wall in the video but I've read some of his comments from news articles and yeah the oddities don't really make sense.
The rifle videos are compelling to say he didn't do it too, as there's no way for it to make sense.
As for the "it's a squib" argument, the best I've got is maybe. Some of the footage they show is quite compelling in that direction, like the artifact like bullet hole video, or the way the shirt is moving with no wound or armor in place.
The "it's coagulated one" though, that's weaker. The video used as proof ain't good quality to begin with tbh, and video is one thing I do know a little about. zooming on a low res moving image creates a terrible artifact effect which can make liquids look in part solid, like they are coagulated. I'll admit if it was an arterial spray that's not the image I'd expect, but the "it's coming from his shirt and not him" vids were slightly more convincing conceptually.
Now the post shooting carry and lack of blood at the crime scene? That's a little more convincing with me, but I'll Devils advocate. Can't explain the "there's no blood" at the shooting site, but the carrying around one? There are elements that can be devils advocated away. That said, the way it does seem to be run like an action scene from a film, and the way there's no blood drops and no obvious dressings of the wound... Well it is suspicious at least.
I still think there's too little good info though on wtf actually happened. They said Ashley babbit was a fake event due to a similar scenario, but everyone acts like she's dead too. True is we may never truly know before the film ends, and the conjecture and theories tend to lead people to question Trump more than question the enemy.
Thank you for looking at that video.
Good points raised.
I'll admit, I thought the Babbit theory was nonsense till someone here posted that video analyzing all the footage. There are so many things that just don't make sense and it seems like actors in a movie.
Same
I voted for Trump 3 times,
been a supporter since 2014 when Trump was quote-tweeting my vaccine-autism tweets
but im also not blinded by love
if parents truly love their children, will the parents actually “see” or “catch” their child with his hand in the cookie jar?
or will the parents be so blinded by love that the child will successfully convince the parents that he was actually putting the cookie back in the cookie jar?
I understand you.