It’s happening in the US as well, just not as bad. To see the population shifting that is occurring by country, go to this website —> https://www.populationpyramid.net/ukraine/2024/ Our young patriots need to have more kids.
The US has been at or below replacement every single year since 1970 (over half a century). Ukraine's graph would look closer to the US's graph if not for the addition of the immigration numbers (and their larger imported birth rate). That importation of aliens (legal and illegal) has been supporting the illusion of "overpopulation" for a very long time. It's a complete contrivance. The US and America are pretty much the same if you take out immigration.
Legal abortion was a contributing factor, but population rates had been going down steadily for about 50 years before that, starting with Rockefeller and Sanger (and others, but they were the most prominent/visible). They were not initially working towards legal abortion, that came later (there was plenty of illegal abortion, kinda like how pot was only kinda "illegal" for a long time before it became legal in some states)..
Having said that, it wasn't Sanger/Rockefeller who were running that population program first. It was Annie Bessant and other Rothschild agents in Europe. They had been running the exact same programming in Europe before they imported the program by Rockefeller/Sanger into America around WWI. (They knew each other, but you should look at the Sanger/Bessant story arc. They are uncanny.)
Honestly, abortion was not a good method of population control. That was well known at the time. You can find all sorts of legitimate studies on that from the 20s-50s. That's how you can find all sorts of quotes from Sanger who was "against abortion." She was "against' it because it wasn't effective enough. People never look at the important context when they quote her about that, but it is important to understand that it WASN'T the best path to wide spread population reduction. Instead, abortion was designed to be targeted population control. They designed the abortion system with targeted propaganda systems, penal systems, schools, food, medicine, etc.. Abortion affects blacks:whites about 5:1 and about 2.5:1 latino:white). Population growth on the other hand, is reduced across the board.
The biggest contributor is, believe it or not, probably either microplastics or propaganda, or possibly vaccines. It's really hard to say because there's no good studies on any of those. We only know that it happens quite a bit, not how much.
Indeed and the problem is only projected to get worse.
The rates of family formation and marriage rates are also in the toilet. In fact they are so low it’s actually lowering the Divorce rate. Because there are so few getting married
Interesting that “replacement level” is based on current population numbers, and attached to the economic concept of GDP.
What’s wrong with comfy homogeneous societies like a hundred years ago?
The main thing driving population growth is public sector pensions. Fire 80% of the useless public service, eliminate welfare as a lifestyle choice, zero welfare immigration, cut taxes (mainly used to pay for the previous problems) and suddenly everything starts to work again.
I mean it’s not necessarily impossible. It’s just that a large swath of potential strategies, tactics, and policy. Has largely been written off from the start by people on both sides of the aisle. As they are fundamentally unpalatable and distasteful to the majority of the current Modern Western cultural, political, and religious zeitgeist.
So it’s considered impossible because other strategies cannot and will not be considered. Because to do otherwise requires admitting to extremely serious and fundamental flaws in our current preferred way of viewing politics, policy, and the world at large. On both sides of the aisle.
The problem is further compounded by the fact our current idea of Economics since really the 18th-19th century has more or less taken the idea of more or less constant growth as a given. Each generation subsequently being expected to be at the same size or larger than the previous to maintain consumption rates. No one really has an idea for what happens if the population is only shrinking consistently.
If it's impossible (doubtful) then all of humanity is screwed since just about every nation is spiralling. I'm pretty sure USA is higher than most Latin American nations these days.
I believe we can turn that around here in the States, but it'll take ALL Females to participate, and much of it will probably have to be Surrogates considering the Evil Vaxxxine they impinged upon us that we now know was fully intended to either Kill us or make us sterile....
Sadly, it means that MANY of not Most of the Females will have to birth to full term at least 6+ Children each....
And the ones that DON'T WANT Children can simply Give them to Conservative Parents who cannot have children....
I really hate to admit it, but Hitler might have been onto something with his Youth Camps where most of the Females came home Pregnant....
I'm not really concerned with the rest of the world, it isn't as if the Entire Planet is named ""America""....
But yeah, the Chinese PM or something gave the order for the Chinese to have more Children right before or as they rolled out the Convid Scare....
Tells me they ALL knew it was an actual Biological Attack on Mankind, and it even had stages, which we are witnessing today....
1yr, 2-3yr, 5yr and 10yr, are the final Stages, for Massive Illnesses and Massive Deaths.....
As for the Youth Camps, I think they probably had some that were Co-Ed, and many of the females that went to them returned home Pregnant, which lead to Hitler setting up a program for these Young Women without Husbands, I think they were called Hitlers Wives or some such thing....
That is part of the solution. Family assistance only if there is a man in the house. Several details to go along with that, like widowed, etc. Grandfather the female head of household assistance for 3-5 years, but no new female head of households getting assistance. A large portion of women choose to have children out of wedlock just to get the assistance. And marriage causes them to lose the assistance. The government Causes women and men to make the wrong decisions. Abortion and welfare have, in many men’s minds, relieved men of their responsibilities for a child.
That is the world the Jab came from. I recognized it right away. It was the only future warfare idea that received a negative score. But of course that sounded good to the DS.
First of all this map is wrong an outdated. France is above 1.8, and Hungary (depending on what your source is) is around 1.5-1.6. And those're the "official" numbers.
I mention this every time someone brings up population and birth rates, because it irks me that people will do autistic levels of research on every other topic but take this at face value. But the truth is, the way birth rates are calculated are intentionally faulty.
In pretty much every civilized nation, including here in the west, we've done EVERYTHING we can to eliminate underage pregnancy and births. And we've been largely successful. In the US for example, juvenile births have crashed by more than 90-95% since the 90s. And I doubt anyone will argue against that being a good thing. But the problem is, that we still calculate birth rates the old way, which INTENTIONALLY INCLUDES all of those underage women that we've actively done everything we can possibly do to prevent them from having kids.
If you adjust birthrate to reflect this modern value of NOT wanting teenagers to marry, get pregnant, and give birth, then guess what? Birthrates skyrocket. The US for example, hovers between 2.0-2.1 and some years even dips up to 2.2.
Now I WILL be fair here, since I don't want to spread ACTUAL misinformation. I haven't done the math for EVERY country (obviously), but I have done a handful besides the US to get a general idea. For example, South Korea, well and truly IS screwed. Even WITH the adjusted birthrate, they're still at like 1.1-1.2. Poland typically goes around 1.4-1.5, so they're not AS bad and COULD be reversed if they adopted Hungary like policies to reverse birth rate decline, but they're not anywhere near replacement
But in these countries there are unique factors (like work culture or overly repressed housing markets even compared to the rest of the world) that drive down their birth rates.
My point is this, birth rates are a lie, it's not as bad as they want you to believe, people need to do their own research. Because everything I just said? That's all assuming death rates and population numbers ARE true, which a lot of people think (with evidence) that they aren't and populations are MUCH smaller than we've been led to believe with deaths being overinflated in order to fluff up voter rolls, social security rolls, etc. for various forms of fraud.
So taking THAT into account, it's entirely possible the truth is even better than what I've determined.
Outstanding. Thanks for doing that work. The US has an extra advantage, people want to come here. I do think that we should focus mostly on young, smart, conservatives from Europe and just cherry pick quality from other areas.
It’s happening in the US as well, just not as bad. To see the population shifting that is occurring by country, go to this website —> https://www.populationpyramid.net/ukraine/2024/ Our young patriots need to have more kids.
The US has been at or below replacement every single year since 1970 (over half a century). Ukraine's graph would look closer to the US's graph if not for the addition of the immigration numbers (and their larger imported birth rate). That importation of aliens (legal and illegal) has been supporting the illusion of "overpopulation" for a very long time. It's a complete contrivance. The US and America are pretty much the same if you take out immigration.
Hmmmmm .... 1970 ..... almost 60 years ago .....
.... I wonder what else happened about 60 years ago .....
Legal abortion was a contributing factor, but population rates had been going down steadily for about 50 years before that, starting with Rockefeller and Sanger (and others, but they were the most prominent/visible). They were not initially working towards legal abortion, that came later (there was plenty of illegal abortion, kinda like how pot was only kinda "illegal" for a long time before it became legal in some states)..
Having said that, it wasn't Sanger/Rockefeller who were running that population program first. It was Annie Bessant and other Rothschild agents in Europe. They had been running the exact same programming in Europe before they imported the program by Rockefeller/Sanger into America around WWI. (They knew each other, but you should look at the Sanger/Bessant story arc. They are uncanny.)
Honestly, abortion was not a good method of population control. That was well known at the time. You can find all sorts of legitimate studies on that from the 20s-50s. That's how you can find all sorts of quotes from Sanger who was "against abortion." She was "against' it because it wasn't effective enough. People never look at the important context when they quote her about that, but it is important to understand that it WASN'T the best path to wide spread population reduction. Instead, abortion was designed to be targeted population control. They designed the abortion system with targeted propaganda systems, penal systems, schools, food, medicine, etc.. Abortion affects blacks:whites about 5:1 and about 2.5:1 latino:white). Population growth on the other hand, is reduced across the board.
The biggest contributor is, believe it or not, probably either microplastics or propaganda, or possibly vaccines. It's really hard to say because there's no good studies on any of those. We only know that it happens quite a bit, not how much.
Indeed and the problem is only projected to get worse.
The rates of family formation and marriage rates are also in the toilet. In fact they are so low it’s actually lowering the Divorce rate. Because there are so few getting married
THIS GUY IS LYING.
THE BIRTHRATE WILL TURN AROUND ALMOST IMMEDIATELY ONCE YOU STOP KILLING HALF THE BABIES.
And the percentage of grown men living at home with parents doesn’t help. Fix the economy and babies will arrive.
Interesting that “replacement level” is based on current population numbers, and attached to the economic concept of GDP.
What’s wrong with comfy homogeneous societies like a hundred years ago?
The main thing driving population growth is public sector pensions. Fire 80% of the useless public service, eliminate welfare as a lifestyle choice, zero welfare immigration, cut taxes (mainly used to pay for the previous problems) and suddenly everything starts to work again.
I mean it’s not necessarily impossible. It’s just that a large swath of potential strategies, tactics, and policy. Has largely been written off from the start by people on both sides of the aisle. As they are fundamentally unpalatable and distasteful to the majority of the current Modern Western cultural, political, and religious zeitgeist.
So it’s considered impossible because other strategies cannot and will not be considered. Because to do otherwise requires admitting to extremely serious and fundamental flaws in our current preferred way of viewing politics, policy, and the world at large. On both sides of the aisle.
The problem is further compounded by the fact our current idea of Economics since really the 18th-19th century has more or less taken the idea of more or less constant growth as a given. Each generation subsequently being expected to be at the same size or larger than the previous to maintain consumption rates. No one really has an idea for what happens if the population is only shrinking consistently.
If it's impossible (doubtful) then all of humanity is screwed since just about every nation is spiralling. I'm pretty sure USA is higher than most Latin American nations these days.
All Except for those who did not get the Convid Vaxxxines....
AKA, Muslims, and others whom we would call Terrorists....
Meh, sometimes the field needs to lie fallow.
Found the jew
I believe we can turn that around here in the States, but it'll take ALL Females to participate, and much of it will probably have to be Surrogates considering the Evil Vaxxxine they impinged upon us that we now know was fully intended to either Kill us or make us sterile....
Sadly, it means that MANY of not Most of the Females will have to birth to full term at least 6+ Children each....
And the ones that DON'T WANT Children can simply Give them to Conservative Parents who cannot have children....
I really hate to admit it, but Hitler might have been onto something with his Youth Camps where most of the Females came home Pregnant....
Tell me more about the youth camps. Giggity giggity.
And we may have to take a theme from the Mormons, there’s a massive shortage of available men world wide. The percentages are bad. Especially CHYNA.
I'm not really concerned with the rest of the world, it isn't as if the Entire Planet is named ""America""....
But yeah, the Chinese PM or something gave the order for the Chinese to have more Children right before or as they rolled out the Convid Scare....
Tells me they ALL knew it was an actual Biological Attack on Mankind, and it even had stages, which we are witnessing today....
1yr, 2-3yr, 5yr and 10yr, are the final Stages, for Massive Illnesses and Massive Deaths.....
As for the Youth Camps, I think they probably had some that were Co-Ed, and many of the females that went to them returned home Pregnant, which lead to Hitler setting up a program for these Young Women without Husbands, I think they were called Hitlers Wives or some such thing....
From single mom to Fuhrer side piece.
The left has also made children more expensive for the families not on assistance.
It’s not family assistance because of there ls a man in the house. Good luck getting government help.
That is part of the solution. Family assistance only if there is a man in the house. Several details to go along with that, like widowed, etc. Grandfather the female head of household assistance for 3-5 years, but no new female head of households getting assistance. A large portion of women choose to have children out of wedlock just to get the assistance. And marriage causes them to lose the assistance. The government Causes women and men to make the wrong decisions. Abortion and welfare have, in many men’s minds, relieved men of their responsibilities for a child.
Legally manufactured. The fact that the feds would go to women’s home to make sure there were no sign of adult males is ridiculous.
Well if someone developed a race based bio weapon it might reverse itself
That is the world the Jab came from. I recognized it right away. It was the only future warfare idea that received a negative score. But of course that sounded good to the DS.
Muh mRNA
First of all this map is wrong an outdated. France is above 1.8, and Hungary (depending on what your source is) is around 1.5-1.6. And those're the "official" numbers.
I mention this every time someone brings up population and birth rates, because it irks me that people will do autistic levels of research on every other topic but take this at face value. But the truth is, the way birth rates are calculated are intentionally faulty.
In pretty much every civilized nation, including here in the west, we've done EVERYTHING we can to eliminate underage pregnancy and births. And we've been largely successful. In the US for example, juvenile births have crashed by more than 90-95% since the 90s. And I doubt anyone will argue against that being a good thing. But the problem is, that we still calculate birth rates the old way, which INTENTIONALLY INCLUDES all of those underage women that we've actively done everything we can possibly do to prevent them from having kids.
If you adjust birthrate to reflect this modern value of NOT wanting teenagers to marry, get pregnant, and give birth, then guess what? Birthrates skyrocket. The US for example, hovers between 2.0-2.1 and some years even dips up to 2.2.
Now I WILL be fair here, since I don't want to spread ACTUAL misinformation. I haven't done the math for EVERY country (obviously), but I have done a handful besides the US to get a general idea. For example, South Korea, well and truly IS screwed. Even WITH the adjusted birthrate, they're still at like 1.1-1.2. Poland typically goes around 1.4-1.5, so they're not AS bad and COULD be reversed if they adopted Hungary like policies to reverse birth rate decline, but they're not anywhere near replacement
But in these countries there are unique factors (like work culture or overly repressed housing markets even compared to the rest of the world) that drive down their birth rates.
My point is this, birth rates are a lie, it's not as bad as they want you to believe, people need to do their own research. Because everything I just said? That's all assuming death rates and population numbers ARE true, which a lot of people think (with evidence) that they aren't and populations are MUCH smaller than we've been led to believe with deaths being overinflated in order to fluff up voter rolls, social security rolls, etc. for various forms of fraud.
So taking THAT into account, it's entirely possible the truth is even better than what I've determined.
Outstanding. Thanks for doing that work. The US has an extra advantage, people want to come here. I do think that we should focus mostly on young, smart, conservatives from Europe and just cherry pick quality from other areas.