Three of the four creeps in the article engaged in pederasty, the targeting of young males. This is much more sinister than the pursuit of post-pubescent young females capable of having children, because that is engaging the unconscious drive to reproduce but without moral or sympathetic guardrails. That is still very wrong, especially the way that van der Post did it from a position of authority over a vulnerable foreign girl. At least he didn’t have the baby aborted, and maybe that child grew up to be a decent person.
A man pursuing young males has no reproductive rationality. The man might not have a sexual drive to do so as much as he has a desire to damage. The Rothschild-controlled British Empire invaded and colonized the homelands of other ethnic groups such as the Indians and Irish. Mountbatten buggered Indian and Northern Irish boys possibly not because he was actually horny but because he wanted to damage the next generation of rebels against the Rothschild-controlled crown while they were still young and vulnerable. Mountbatten was a demonic bully and a coward.
In 2015, Bishop Ball was finally convicted of 12 horrific instances of sexual abuse of boys and young men, all under the guise of religious ritual.”
Ball targeted male novitiates to the church. These young males had the calling and conviction that made them potential spiritual leaders that could upend the anti-Christian British order. So the Rothschild-controlled crown promoted the infiltrator Ball to damage and derail the males while they were young, vulnerable, and aiming to please church elders. Utterly satanic.
Saville’s pederasty and necrophilia(!) remind us of the Parasite Pill and the hypothesis that demons might use parasites to influence people to engage in behaviors that spread parasites. That’s on top of Saville’s desire to damage the younger competition while he could. Crazy disgusting.
No doubt the FBI evidence he turned over was gathered on “accident” and not part of a sting. The sting being RICO there is surely no valid reason it wouldn’t have been dealt with immediately. Did Cohen coin the term “batty boy” or was it from prior to him?
I used to laugh at Ali G and Borat until Cohen targeted Ron Paul.
During the interview, I revealed that basically Gio (Cohen’s character) has molested an eight-year-old boy. Now, mind you, this is extreme comedy“
What an insane idea for a comedy sketch. No consideration for abuse survivors who might just want to watch some comedy.
Cohen and his team of producers immediately handed their footage over to the FBI who, Cohen says, “decided not to pursue it”.“
The link provided only generated the article text but no videos. Are there any videos available of this supposed meeting of “Gio”/ Cohen and the hotel concierge?
Beats me, but if he turned it over to the FBI as evidence, it probably didn’t get published separately. I do remember hearing about this story years ago, though.
While this comment trended toward him exposing the ring as deep cover, I could easily see him generally being on either side, and have previously seen him as being on the other, especially with some of the degeneracy he pushed in Borat. It’s probably best to be able to see how anyone could be on different factions playing different angles, and have been aligned and flipped at different times, anyway.
Without the video, I’m tempted to suspect that Cohen fabricated the story to divert attention from the (((real pedos))). That supposedly the FBI decided not to pursue isn’t helping Cohen’s story.
The left have hated the royal family for a long time. They hate anything that resembles British history or culture, anything patriotic. For years called them leeches on society that should be abolished.
Most lefties I know are starstruck when the "royals" are on TV or in the news. Heck, even my jobless, English major, late 40's cousin that still lives at home uses british spelling for colour, programme, flavour etc and talks about how superior his english heritage is.
Yes. My cousins are infatuated with them. I asked once what was going on with Kate and her cancer and got a snippy lecture that her name is Katherine…. 🙄
I think what anon meant was American far left hate anything/everything to do with British colonialism.
That's a well known fact that part of the social engineering mind virus these commie retards were programmed with is that the "muh white male patriarchy" is to blame for the modern world's problems. Thus, the origin of blame gets pegged on the British Empire by NPCs.
Least I think that's what they were trying to imply.
I always look with askance at those types, I mean we fought a freaking war for our freedom, but then again, they also go along with our "betters" making six-figure salaries, practicing insider trading on our backs and pretty much replacing English royalty for American royalty.
Royal families are trash and always have been. The left genetallybworship those idiots. Patriots my ass. I have no use for the british overlords and neither should any American.
I am so sorry I am a conservative and I don’t like the royals, they are leeches and pedophiles, kill kids and eat humans. Conclusion they are demons/reptilians.
Definitely, we all know “Prince” Charles my ass, all of them are pedophiles, so it is nothing new, what is new bunch of libtards that are trying to confuse us when they write something.
Agree. However, the "diversity is our strength" non sequitur at the end does leave a bad taste, but up to that point it was a useful drawing together in one place of a lot of threads I had heard before.
So Liz was a royal faghag and surrounded herself with pedocannibalist weirdies like Saville, to whom she gave several knighthoods. Saville was 20 yrs Charles' senior. Charles didn't have a chance.
The royals, and the UK government, think throwing Andrew under the bus will take the heat off Charles.
Instead, I think it's going to lead straight to the king due to his decades-long friendship with Jimmy Savile, among other things - such as this article.
Diana knew. That's why she's gone.
They're not going to be able to hide this much longer.
Three of the four creeps in the article engaged in pederasty, the targeting of young males. This is much more sinister than the pursuit of post-pubescent young females capable of having children, because that is engaging the unconscious drive to reproduce but without moral or sympathetic guardrails. That is still very wrong, especially the way that van der Post did it from a position of authority over a vulnerable foreign girl. At least he didn’t have the baby aborted, and maybe that child grew up to be a decent person.
A man pursuing young males has no reproductive rationality. The man might not have a sexual drive to do so as much as he has a desire to damage. The Rothschild-controlled British Empire invaded and colonized the homelands of other ethnic groups such as the Indians and Irish. Mountbatten buggered Indian and Northern Irish boys possibly not because he was actually horny but because he wanted to damage the next generation of rebels against the Rothschild-controlled crown while they were still young and vulnerable. Mountbatten was a demonic bully and a coward.
Ball targeted male novitiates to the church. These young males had the calling and conviction that made them potential spiritual leaders that could upend the anti-Christian British order. So the Rothschild-controlled crown promoted the infiltrator Ball to damage and derail the males while they were young, vulnerable, and aiming to please church elders. Utterly satanic.
Saville’s pederasty and necrophilia(!) remind us of the Parasite Pill and the hypothesis that demons might use parasites to influence people to engage in behaviors that spread parasites. That’s on top of Saville’s desire to damage the younger competition while he could. Crazy disgusting.
This is a very enlightening (and sadly disgusting) perspective. Thanks for sharing.
Sooooo glad that you mentioned the Parasite Pill also! Tons of information that completely makes 100% sense.
First time reading the Parasite Pill, it might seem outlandish, but the more you look around the more the pieces seem to fit the hypothesis.
My exact observation(s) as well !
Correlation spotted.
Relevant: https://web.archive.org/web/20250118053226/https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/news/sacha-baron-cohen-paedophile-ring-who-is-america-deleted-scene-las-vegas-fbi-showtime-a8695866.html
Cohen is Jewish btw. “Mountbatten” is …?
MOUNT BATTEN. Batty boy! Batty boy! “Mount. Batty boys.”
The royals being Prussian, does his name refer to
No doubt the FBI evidence he turned over was gathered on “accident” and not part of a sting. The sting being RICO there is surely no valid reason it wouldn’t have been dealt with immediately. Did Cohen coin the term “batty boy” or was it from prior to him?
Wew!
u/Kimball_Kinnison u/catsfive u/5DChessWatch
I used to laugh at Ali G and Borat until Cohen targeted Ron Paul.
What an insane idea for a comedy sketch. No consideration for abuse survivors who might just want to watch some comedy.
The link provided only generated the article text but no videos. Are there any videos available of this supposed meeting of “Gio”/ Cohen and the hotel concierge?
Beats me, but if he turned it over to the FBI as evidence, it probably didn’t get published separately. I do remember hearing about this story years ago, though.
While this comment trended toward him exposing the ring as deep cover, I could easily see him generally being on either side, and have previously seen him as being on the other, especially with some of the degeneracy he pushed in Borat. It’s probably best to be able to see how anyone could be on different factions playing different angles, and have been aligned and flipped at different times, anyway.
Without the video, I’m tempted to suspect that Cohen fabricated the story to divert attention from the (((real pedos))). That supposedly the FBI decided not to pursue isn’t helping Cohen’s story.
No disagreement here. Don’t let him babysit your children anytime soon.
The fact that his name is basically Saxe Coburg just blew my mind.
I also hadn’t seen an option where he might be working to good ends, but no rush to judgment.
Match this with the Alien post from today.
https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASFqppZig/i-call-this-meme-alien-vs-predat/c/
“Who is the queen?”
When someone is infected, a new alien bursts out of their heart.
The aliens take attention off the predators.
Maybe stretchy here, maybe not.
The guy who wrote that artice is a total fuckwit. Raving left wing nut job. Just read the shit towards the end where he pivots to Indian immigrants.
The left are really fucking retarded.
The left have hated the royal family for a long time. They hate anything that resembles British history or culture, anything patriotic. For years called them leeches on society that should be abolished.
Where did you make that observation?
Most lefties I know are starstruck when the "royals" are on TV or in the news. Heck, even my jobless, English major, late 40's cousin that still lives at home uses british spelling for colour, programme, flavour etc and talks about how superior his english heritage is.
Yes. My cousins are infatuated with them. I asked once what was going on with Kate and her cancer and got a snippy lecture that her name is Katherine…. 🙄
I think what anon meant was American far left hate anything/everything to do with British colonialism.
That's a well known fact that part of the social engineering mind virus these commie retards were programmed with is that the "muh white male patriarchy" is to blame for the modern world's problems. Thus, the origin of blame gets pegged on the British Empire by NPCs.
Least I think that's what they were trying to imply.
Ahhh. That makes more sense, their wording certainly threw me off. The programming on the left is VERY intense.
Sometimes you can actually see their brain stall when you give them a dose of critical thinking.
I always look with askance at those types, I mean we fought a freaking war for our freedom, but then again, they also go along with our "betters" making six-figure salaries, practicing insider trading on our backs and pretty much replacing English royalty for American royalty.
ORLY?
The British conservatives I know HATE the royals, who are Prussian, not British.
Try ashkanzis. Placed there after the rothchilds bankrupted a british king and took over the marriage rights to bail them.out.
I have little doubt that the Prussian lines are Ashkenazi, but haven’t found the definitive link to make that claim yet.
Ancient German / Bavarian but Prussian adjacent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saxe-Coburg_and_Gotha
Wow!!!
Check my other comment! 2+2 = ? !!!
Sachsen-Coburg
…And Sascha Baron Cohen-burg turned over the evidence while pointing out their groomer?
This is nuts!
Royal families are trash and always have been. The left genetallybworship those idiots. Patriots my ass. I have no use for the british overlords and neither should any American.
I am so sorry I am a conservative and I don’t like the royals, they are leeches and pedophiles, kill kids and eat humans. Conclusion they are demons/reptilians.
Definitely, we all know “Prince” Charles my ass, all of them are pedophiles, so it is nothing new, what is new bunch of libtards that are trying to confuse us when they write something.
Agree. However, the "diversity is our strength" non sequitur at the end does leave a bad taste, but up to that point it was a useful drawing together in one place of a lot of threads I had heard before.
I agree though the cabals minions are retarded.
APPROPRIATE POST TO BRING BACK TO OUR ATTENTION, TODAY, consider the arrest news and events currently unfolding.
I haven’t seen a lot of talk about the king and Epstein but it’s there and may well come out soon now that Andrew has been charged.
The royals, and the UK government, think throwing Andrew under the bus will take the heat off Charles.
Instead, I think it's going to lead straight to the king due to his decades-long friendship with Jimmy Savile, among other things.
Diana knew. That's why she's gone.
They're not going to be able to hide this much longer.
Yes, I think you are correct.
Everything is about sex, except sex, which is about power.
So Liz was a royal faghag and surrounded herself with pedocannibalist weirdies like Saville, to whom she gave several knighthoods. Saville was 20 yrs Charles' senior. Charles didn't have a chance.
The royals, and the UK government, think throwing Andrew under the bus will take the heat off Charles.
Instead, I think it's going to lead straight to the king due to his decades-long friendship with Jimmy Savile, among other things - such as this article.
Diana knew. That's why she's gone.
They're not going to be able to hide this much longer.
For what it's worth, I can easily believe every word of this article (except that last unrelated sentence about Indian migrants - ?)
there have been plenty of stories about Mountbatten and Savile for decades.
Andrew probably is chatty atm. Doubt theyll be happy if he talks.