"BQQM: Sure looks like the White Hats just confiscated Dominion Voting Systems... it is now in the hands of Liberty Vote, run by Scott Leiendecker, former St. Louis Republican election director and founder of KnowInk, the company behind the “Poll Pad” technology used nationwide..."
(twitter.com)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
This dude is not a white hat. There is no saving that crap. Elections will never be secure as long as mail in ballots exist and machines are counting.
Any machines must have blockchain proof and must be 100% open source including the hardware and firmware… otherwise you might as well just give up.
I know im late to the party. Just wanted to say while I agree, I was a judge at the last presidential election for my district. Ill do up an article about my experiences, but just wanted to say, if it is...machine assisted, not dependant, I would be OK if it was done the way we did it. Though we had really good people.
Per vote we had three electronic records, 2 paper records, state issued ID required, cross checked against the voter roles( proof of citizenship required to sign up), and we turned people away. THEN the vote count had to match the checked in person tally, and we had to have 100% accuracy on ALL counts before we could leave. It was my first time volunteering and now it won't be the last.
The real danger is that when its machine assisted its easy to introduced rigged tests that "prove" the machine isn't doing anything bad... and a judge can rule that a full recount of the paper is not allowed because the rigged test was enough to validate.
I don't think "machine assisted" automatically means "fuckery," but it is an unnecessary potential security risk. No matter how you try to remove the risk through "check points", the risk will remain. Ink on paper = secure. Electronic dot from an electronic button = risk.
There is nothing wrong with in person paper ballots. Machines don't appreciably reduce the time. They certainly don't improve security. There is zero reason for electronics, and plenty of reason to not use it. As far as I'm concerned, anything more "electronic" than a light bulb is potentially fuckery... (...in the actual process of voting,. There is plenty of fuckery in the rest of the system, especially in propaganda, the construction of the laws we are voting for, and "what law actually is".))
Pretty much agree with you on all points.
Though do remember, paper ballots have had plenty of cheating themselves, they are just one key component to minimizing the cheating.
Same day voting, eliminating mail in ballots, all work together to minimize cheeting. Paper ballots by themselves dont remove the cheating.
We saw a dozen ways of cheating with paper ballots on the 2020 selection. In no way was I suggesting that paper ballets == secure. I only said it was a lower risk than machines.
Rule number one of security, always start with the simplest possible secure system. Never add a "feature" to a secure system unless there is no other choice. Evidence has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that "more convenient voting" is not such a feature.
Rooks, if you are a judge on these matters, read my 1st comment here & let me know if it I should talk to my friend at all: https://greatawakening.win/p/1ARK9k0RMv/rudy--all-others-involved-in-inv/
I'm greatful you and he are willing to do this, and I wish I was, but I was not that kind of judge.
When you work polls during an election, one of the positions is called a judge. In red states anyways, They act as witness to voters checking in, escort voters to their designated polling booths, arbitrate discussions and disputes, and verify authenticity of the vote counts both paper and electronic.
We also verified each voter saw both the electronic and paper copies of their votes, had receipts for their vote, which they could authenticate at any time, and then we witnessed and validated all the machines, paper ballots, and couriers to the courthouse. I was the republican judge, and I had a democrat counterpart.
While I feel it was an important role and there was more to it, in the end it wasn't a court judge position. Hope this clears it up.
Sorry.
Thank you for your service, fren. By authenticate does that mean that every voter can assure that their vote really went to the candidates they voted for?
Correct. Every decision on the ballot was printed on a paper copy and presented to the voter at time of casting for review, and they could change anything they wanted (changes voided the stuff printed up to that point and re-printed the changed material Easier to show than tell). Once vote was cast the info printed their confirmation, showing the vote was finalized, and they were given their "receipt copy" to review. They can then request a review of the physical copy and the digital copy for confirmation. Our precinct then reviewed at the end all the votes and tallies. These numbers were added up and compared to the number from the "door guard" who had a tally of how many came in, and the check in station, who verified ID, so we knew we had the right number of votes.
Each job had a Republican and Democrat. And they kept tallies and had to agree with each other.
Then, all information was taken to the county courthouse and compiled. Within an hour we had all the final numbers from all the poling stations, in a PDF on the county website displaying the numbers, broken down into all the districts, towns, etc.
We got to see our numbers right there and I was able to confirm they were correct.
It was far more transparent to process than I had realized we had in place. I had no choice about using machines to actually vote.
However, it was about the most transparent message that I could have asked for if we have to use machines.
The only real math the machines did was per station. How many votes and the people who were voted for. Those were backed up by paper records. That anyone could check.
Not that I could count all of them throughout the day, but the numbers at least, seemed very accurate for the number of people we had. With the checks and balances, I felt reasonably sure that at least a number of votes was accurate.
We weren't allowed to comment either way for any candidate, but with the way everyone was talking and what I saw, i feel like our results were very accurate.
Sad thing was a lot of old either single men or single women we're the ones who voted for democrats.
We have a decent sized Mexican population. And based on the comments, they almost exclusively voted republican.
Between lunchtime and close, we had a crap ton of construction and blue-collar, workers come in with their high viz. Vests.
Great news Rooks! Thanks for summary. This must be because you are in a Republican area. They want the vote correctly counted. That gives me hope. Democratic areas are a lot different but I'm glad that at least 1/2 the country is OK that you. You guys just might pull us through!
This is not good news it’s re- Branded (22minutes) https://rumble.com/v70jb4u-david-k.-clements-dominion-rebrand-meet-the-new-leviathan-tentacle-replacin.html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_o&sci=9e8d2558-6cf6-4218-a527-f517fdfd8a29
Personally I don't trust ANYONE who has these machines. Paper ballot ONLY.
I agree. It doesn't matter who them, they shouldn't be used at all.
Damn straight, friend
Didn't save VA.
#truth
Did Liberty Vote buy a “crime scene”? Doesn’t that mean that Liberty Vote gets all of the data from all elections, including all backups, going all the way back to the beginning of the company?
No. Why would they keep stuff like that? They burn ballots and stuff like a week after they are done counting… you think they keep centralized backup? Maybe of code but I’m sure the repos with the real code are probably not even in this country.
It seems odd that the CEO of the company would decide to sell after the Justice Department started looking into election irregularities in Missouri.
No worries mate! Leiendecker is wearing "DOGE" under-garmets. They already know what they are looking for... this shouldn't take long to unfold.
Now, just for giggles, imagine how you would strategically use this "event/disclosure" in your larger strategies... When? And Why Now?
I suspect the Trump team has several "reveals" in their pockets awaiting their use.
I sure hope DJT is a legit human being... and not a marvelously performed "controlled opposition" frontman. I know that is an uncomfortable thought. All currrent events scream he is doing all the right actions that align with an illuminated white hat.
One thing we all definitely agree on... and that is companies that built software to dilberately steal elections is NOT people who should be embedded into our election infrastructure. It is literally insane and has to be dismantled before mid-term elections.
Hell of a movie... ain't it?
mmmmm that elections getting more secure feeling really slaps in the morning
old news
"Liberty is pushing a reset built on paper based transparency, security, and simplicity... they also moved Dominion to settle lawsuits against Trump allies..."
(JUST IN - Dominion Voting Systems sold to Liberty Vote, a company run by ex-GOP election official, Scott Leiendecker, for an undisclosed sum — Axios)
https://x.com/disclosetv/status/1976358638735523954
I'm stuck in CA for 7 more years. As we all know, when illegals get their driver's licenses it automatically registers them to vote. I pray that somehow this can be reversed (I know the admin talked about it) but I think we are in too far of a hole to get ourselves out of it. And this being all over the country. Also, blue states are still doing their best to make things unaffordable while neutering cops, corrupt DA's causing out of control crime so they will eventually move to red states and they will eventually turn purple like some have (NV for example).
So you fill out a paper form, put it into a tally machine, the tally machine is set up to flip the vote. You know, this could have happened in recent elections. No election is safe if they want someone in that someone is in.
If a Christian bought a Brothel would that make the Brothel good or the Christian bad?
Hmmm
If a Christian bought a brothel to shut it down and demolish it and give the people a choice to change.
👍😉
The only thing good about this is it will get the Dems clamoring to get rid of machines. Maybe that's the only way to get rid of them.
Id be very cautious of these guys. If you look at my old posts, you'll know what I'm a part of.
I have to choose words carefully to cover my ass and im not the decision maker in what was created.
Big money tried to buy what I am a part of. This was the group. They rubbed us the wrong way. What we created is open source. They don't want that.
These guys are far from WH imo.
Governor Tom Wolf of Pa bought those machines the summer before the election that installed Biden.
Liberty Vote ... Dominion has changed 'in name only' but everything will be 'business as usual' so nothing has changed! Same players, same game, it is not a new business.
Dominion Voting Systems sold to Liberty Vote, a company run by ex-GOP election official Scott Leiendecker.
The sale isn't very transparent... I can't find the sum for the purchase. Headquarters are still in Canada 🇨🇦 Why am I sharing this??? Because it's a name rebrand for Dominion.... being sold and rebranded as Liberty Vote effective immediately.
A hope and prayer -purchased it to collect information, and he actually pushes for paper ballots. -Liberty Vote also plans on ensuring the company is "100% American owned,"
Reality.....🦏 looking into the guy
Scott Leiendecker is the guy who founded KNOWiNK, the company that invented Poll Pad electronic poll systems. He was an election official in St. Louis before that, so I'd assume he's part of the machine.
There's obviously been some issues with Poll Pad over the past few elections, including connection to printers.
They're the ones who provided the voter ID machines for Dominion in the Georgia counties where they were forced to go to paper ballots that may have been manipulated.
The KnowInk website has been scrubbed does not have any content.
KnowInk is changing its name to Liberty Vote.
Also, his wife did big donations to Raffensperger. Raffensperger(Georgia) -Trump made a recorded phone call on January 2, 2021, to Raffensperger about the election results in Georgia . Raffensperger said the outgoing president's claims were based on falsehoods and election 2020 safe/secure.
https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/09/politics/dominion-voting-systems-bought-election-ballots
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/09/dominion-voting-2020-election-sold-00600661
https://fortune.com/2025/10/09/former-republican-elections-buys-dominion-voting-systems/
The newly renamed Liberty Vote said it would use hand-marked paper ballots, maintain 100% American ownership with domestic staffing and software development, and implement rigorous third-party auditing standards.
The company said its approach would ensure “compliance with President Trump’s executive order” on election security, though specific details were not provided. A 25 March executive order demands states to use voting systems that have a “voter verifiable paper record” (every state except Louisiana already uses paper ballots and paper records, according to the non-profit verified voting). The order also seeks to ban equipment in which a voter’s choices are encoded in a QR code.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/oct/09/dominion-voting-systems-sold
He should do a public service and destroy all of it.