It wasn't a leak. It was a bioweapon attack on the free people of the entire world. They delayed Trump's fight for our freedom from the banks, wasting much of the last 6 years, but making us stronger and wiser.
But Steve Bannon said Gina was just a distraction after the 2020 election theft.
BS I called on Steve. Many things she should have already been in jail for, she is not elected and is not protected under the color of law. Trump appointed her. None of it makes sense anymore.
“ she is not elected and is not protected under the color of law.”
What? I’m not disagreeing with your overall point necessarily but what do you mean here? Who do you think receives so-called protection under color of law? Are you under the impression that “color of law” is some kind of legal shield for elected representatives?
Sorry man I don’t think you know what “under color of law” means. It’s not a legal protection of any kind. It’s when any person acts as the state in an official seeming capacity without duly appointed authority to take away the rights of citizens and citing a non-law to do so. For example: when police officers were running around during Covid arresting people for disobeying health department edicts. The health department has no authority to arrest citizens for refusing to obey such edicts, police officers had no right to enforce such edicts with threats of arrest or actual arrest, and judges had no right to rule against anyone who was not subject to such edicts. In that case, the health departments, police, and judges, were all acting as if people were breaking laws when no such laws existed and thus, were acting under color of law. All of them can be prosecuted for this under federal law. You can’t enforce a non-law and take away people’s rights for disobeying said non-law. THAT’s what “under color of law” means. It’s not some kind of legal shield from prosecution, it’s actually a listed crime that they can be prosecuted for under 18 USC 242.
Oh boy. That didn’t help things. What does RICO have to do with this? Do you not know what THAT is either? Are you just tossing out legal jargon willy nilly hoping it lands? You know these words have definitions, right? RICO has nothing to do with Presidents.
Of course the CIA didn't consider the bioweapons lab. It was their lab
👌👌
🎯
Add to that, that the government owned the Moderna covid shot patent.
It wasn't a leak. It was a bioweapon attack on the free people of the entire world. They delayed Trump's fight for our freedom from the banks, wasting much of the last 6 years, but making us stronger and wiser.
I could be wrong. But I believe they released "the bug" at the military games.
So CIA analysts and Haspel may have been paid?
Nah! Say it isn't so! LOL
https://nitter.net/i/status/2000673783862947998
But Steve Bannon said Gina was just a distraction after the 2020 election theft.
BS I called on Steve. Many things she should have already been in jail for, she is not elected and is not protected under the color of law. Trump appointed her. None of it makes sense anymore.
“ she is not elected and is not protected under the color of law.”
What? I’m not disagreeing with your overall point necessarily but what do you mean here? Who do you think receives so-called protection under color of law? Are you under the impression that “color of law” is some kind of legal shield for elected representatives?
No. Just Presidents and former presidents.
Sorry man I don’t think you know what “under color of law” means. It’s not a legal protection of any kind. It’s when any person acts as the state in an official seeming capacity without duly appointed authority to take away the rights of citizens and citing a non-law to do so. For example: when police officers were running around during Covid arresting people for disobeying health department edicts. The health department has no authority to arrest citizens for refusing to obey such edicts, police officers had no right to enforce such edicts with threats of arrest or actual arrest, and judges had no right to rule against anyone who was not subject to such edicts. In that case, the health departments, police, and judges, were all acting as if people were breaking laws when no such laws existed and thus, were acting under color of law. All of them can be prosecuted for this under federal law. You can’t enforce a non-law and take away people’s rights for disobeying said non-law. THAT’s what “under color of law” means. It’s not some kind of legal shield from prosecution, it’s actually a listed crime that they can be prosecuted for under 18 USC 242.
I did not use color of law as protection. The law is the law. And there are special laws for presidents just not Rico.
Oh boy. That didn’t help things. What does RICO have to do with this? Do you not know what THAT is either? Are you just tossing out legal jargon willy nilly hoping it lands? You know these words have definitions, right? RICO has nothing to do with Presidents.
Paid them to change results?! Thats a VERY serious claim and he better do something if thats actually even 1% true. NO MORE TALK.
Whatever happened to the arrest of Gina Haspell in Germany on 2020 election day?
I remember that. Thought I read she was put to death.
Again, fucking sellouts.
They didn’t dismiss it. They tried to cover it up.
Why is Hegseth acting like a Fox host in this clip?
"Dismissed the obvious" sounds like it could possibly be an oversight when it was intentional fraud.
The criminality of so many in the government for so long is beyond words.
OK I agree this is big.. however what is Hegseth doing on that side of the desk? Was he filling in for someone, or is he now a Fox News anchor?????
at the beginning he states "as we head into 2024..." So no, it is not new. He used to be on Fox, likely this clip is a sub for an anchor.
I was about to say, is the secretary of War would be saying this now it would mean immediate action will follow
I really wish the dates for these "breaking news" stories were included!