I don't believe for a minute that limp-wristed kid shot Charlie. NEVER did. Don't trust Erika, either. Seems clear to me that something is definitely 'off' with her....
Anyone with media savvy knows one the best way to kill a story from an alternate media personality is to ignore the story. Erika Kirk has to be savvy enough to know what she is doing is actually fanning the flames of Candace Owens’ claims.
It might be an overused word here, but is their feud actually kayfabe? Was their private meeting really an opportunity to choreograph this “feud” they’re having? Are Erika Kirk’s denials actually meant to keep Charlie’s murder at the forefront of people’s minds by shining a light on what Candace is saying?
I don't believe for a minute that limp-wristed kid shot Charlie. NEVER did. Don't trust Erika, either. Seems clear to me that something is definitely 'off' with her....
✡️💥CK
Even if Candace did stop, there’s a lot more of us that will keep asking the questions.
Candace's counterproductive and damaging ploy -
https://x.com/xAlphaWarriorx/status/2005843164595421362
https://nitter.net/xAlphaWarriorx/status/2005843164595421362
Charlie ain't dead. But after seeing his wife I'm asking myself, "What did he see in her". Must have been great in the sack.
She really has no redeeming qualities, does she?
Good sandwich maker? I can't much look at her. I think she's fake as hell, a bad liar, and possibly downright evil.
Why? The only downside is for her.
You see, most folks, would say, just debunk the questions... but they don't. We know the playbook doll. Truth is inbound. Deal with it.
Candace's counterproductive and damaging ploy -
https://x.com/xAlphaWarriorx/status/2005843164595421362
https://nitter.net/xAlphaWarriorx/status/2005843164595421362
Anyone with media savvy knows one the best way to kill a story from an alternate media personality is to ignore the story. Erika Kirk has to be savvy enough to know what she is doing is actually fanning the flames of Candace Owens’ claims.
It might be an overused word here, but is their feud actually kayfabe? Was their private meeting really an opportunity to choreograph this “feud” they’re having? Are Erika Kirk’s denials actually meant to keep Charlie’s murder at the forefront of people’s minds by shining a light on what Candace is saying?
Seems unnecessary to me but maybe.
The "is now" seems kinda misplaced, if not downright clicky.
Not to mention that it's overt manipulation.
Erika didn't say "stop asking questions". She told Candace to stop peddling bullshit.
Candace's whole sales plan is to not simply ask questions, but to attack, denigrate, accuse.
But never let an objective articulation of facts get in the way of a good strong bias, right?