Fam, I'm going to need some help going through this drop. I searched "Jimmy Savile" in the docs. I can't even begin to know what this all means...
(www.justice.gov)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
Comments (34)
sorted by:
Pulled from this: Blair & Brown were instrumental in organising the Dunblane School massacre back in 1996 where most of the kids there had been molested as part of a Freemason pedofille ring in which the gunman Thomas Hamilton was a part off which was subsequently covered up by the Scottish judiciary.
Has anyone thought to cross reference school massacres with witnesses or survivors of pedo rings? Are they murdering many to cover their crimes? I mean beyond when they already do that
That’s a very good question.
A VERY Great INSIGHT!!!! AND a question that would need to be answered!!!!! I would think!!!!
That’s exactly what popped into my head when I read about the Dunblane school massacre being in these files so often…. Wild…… What a rabbit hole to go down….,🤬🤯🤯🤯🤯🤬🤬🤬
Sandy Hook?
Sandy Hook was likely part of a different agenda considering that it never happened.
Yes yes yes. Boston bombing too.
Yeah I've heard this before. It was also used to disarm the British people
The Hungerford Massacre happened a few years prior to Dunblane, might be worth cross checking.
Also, if you don't know about Ted Heath and his sordid antics, Michael Shrimpton lays it all out in a radio show he did in 2013. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVkOCfLCz9s
I found one oddity in that document, the word "murder" is spelled "murcter" twice... do a search on it. Apparently (they) are trying to minimize actual murder discussed in this document.
Interesting, here's what Google AI brought up.
"Murcter" appears to be a misspelling of the word "murder," as seen in historical congressional records and older news publications. It is used interchangeably with "murder" in contexts discussing criminal charges and legal responsibility.
Great find. What other words might have been purposely misspelled in the Epstein docs? Perhaps AI can be used to identify misspelled words and highlight any that have been used repeatedly or have similar word associations that might indicate anything of a criminal, abusive, anatomical, sexual, perverse or deviant nature?
Copy & Paste text into a Google Doc, it should auto detect mispelled words different than misused).
I'm wondering what you would see if you searched the word "murcter"?
EFTA00103831.pdf - DataSet 9
From: Jean James <jeanjamesgtelus.net> To: cj washington field <washington.fieldgicibi.gov>, newyork <newyork(kie.fbi.gov> Subject: TRANSATLANTIC PAEDOPHILIA CONNECTIONS? Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:29:36 +0000
ChiLd Abuse. Satanism, and Murcter in Nebraska hr/JrtnWncC*rp r "Children's homes and government m Ind controL programmes are the major source of chiLdren for the American 'elite'. High on the List is Boys Town, Nebraska, which is aLso known as 'Father FLanagan's Boys' Home' after its founder, R omen CathoLic priest Father Edward J. Flanagan. He estabLished Boys Town in 1921 for the 'care, tr eatment, and education of at-risk chiLdren'. If you read the book, The FrankLin Cover Up, by forme r Nebraska state senator, John W DeCamp, you might wonder when the chiLdren are most 'at risk' - b efore they go to Boys Town or after. HomosexuaL prostitution inquiry ensnares VIPs with Reagan, Bu sh The story aLmost got out at one point during the Reagan and Bush administrations, but was quick Ly covered up after this was published in 1989. So the question is why? Why is paedophiLia so eatpervading in FoLLow" 40 of 42
Copied from the pdf so formatting is kinda wonk.
It looks like it is a fully copy of "Sex Collectors Extracts Tony Blair Cullen Gordon Brown British Intelligence MI 6 MI 5 Dunblane Pedophiles nwo illuminati freemasons" https://archive.org/stream/TonyBlairCullenGordonBrownBritishIntelligenceMI6MI5DunblanePedophiles_201903/Tony%20Blair%20Cullen%20Gordon%20Brown%20British%20Intelligence%20MI6%20MI5%20Dunblane%20Pedophiles_djvu.txt
Reminds of Comey spelled as Corney so FOIA requests wouldn’t turn anything up.
Jimmy Saville was a sicko, I researched a little about him back in the day and there are huge connections to big individuals.
Like a King?
Absolutely like a king, and like a prince (Charles) who was very close friends for decades with Savile.
Scotland Yard knew about Savile but never said a word about him until after he died.
Prince Andrew is being run out of the royal family - "thrown under the bus" as we'd say in America - in hopes of taking the heat off of Charles. "Look! He's punishing and exiling his own brother! Of course Charles is against sex trafficking and would never be involved himself!"
Andrew turned out to be a real lowlife but did not seem to go after actual children the way Savile did and the way Charles is suspected of doing.
This 28 years later movie series brought him back into normieville as well. Which is obviously a comm.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00103831.pdf This is the big drop from the search of "Jimmy Savile"
This is where it came from: https://www.justice.gov/epstein
Looks like a scrapbooking of some notorious info that is out there similar to the "RAINES list"
You can also find much of this text here which is a forum post about an early 2006 wikipedia article (which was deleted).
I am just saying this not the original sauce, might be FBI background reading, web deep dive or something like that.
"ChiLd Abuse. Satanism, and Murcter in Nebraska hr/JrtnWncC*rp r "Children's homes and government mInd controL programmes are the major source of chiLdren for the American 'elite'."
Murcter = Murder?
Misspellings matter. (Seems capitalization matters, too.)
u/#q831
David Icke called out Saville in the 90’s. Go read any of his books and dirty ol Jimmy will make an appearance
People like William Cooper, David Icke, Alex Jones; the OG “Conspiracy Theorists” all deserve medals, parades, syndicated talk shows, and apologies from the planet.
If there were sniffer programs to check unencrypted emails over certain Internet runs, murcter would not get picked up like murder. Kind of like how Epstein used Whoops to seemingly indicate murder.
Or like how those people - I forget who it was - would compose emails and let them sit in GMAIL drafts and read the drafts back-and-forth that way and not actually send emails. Pretty crafty.
looks like copy and paste of various articles maybe
Search Assist
Jimmy Savile was found to have sexually abused hundreds of victims over a span of five decades, with allegations including 214 recorded offences, such as 34 rapes, involving individuals as young as eight. His crimes were primarily committed in hospitals and through his work with children on television programs. BBC Wikipedia Overview of Jimmy Savile's Crimes Jimmy Savile, a prominent British media personality, was revealed to be one of the UK's most prolific sex offenders after his death in 2011. Investigations uncovered that he had committed numerous sexual offenses over a span of five decades. Key Facts Number of Victims: Over 450 individuals have come forward with allegations against Savile. Recorded Offenses: Police have formally recorded at least 214 offenses, including: 126 indecent acts 34 rapes or serious sexual assaults Age Range of Victims: Victims included children as young as 8 and adults up to 75 years old. Locations of Abuse Savile's crimes took place in various settings, including: Hospitals BBC premises Nightclubs A hospice for terminally ill patients Methods of Abuse Savile used his celebrity status and charitable work to gain access to vulnerable individuals. He often interacted with children through his television shows, such as "Top of the Pops" and "Jim'll Fix It," which allowed him to exploit his position for sexual gratification. Institutional Response The scandal led to significant public outcry and prompted multiple inquiries into how allegations against Savile were handled during his lifetime. Investigations revealed failures in the systems meant to protect vulnerable individuals, leading to broader discussions about child sexual abuse in institutions.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/child-welfare
Was also into necrophelia
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jimmy-saviles-vilest-deeds-corpse-31149283
What is this you linked to? Just one specific file? Can you share links to specific files on that justice.gov site? Meaning if I want to share one exact file; you can simply copy paste the url + share it?
Is there anyplace we can download the files enmasse/ bulk?
Yes, I linked just one of the sub-links I found after doing a search for the name "Jimmy Savile." These are the other files I spotted from that search. Some files appear to be duplicates. And, I would imagine there are plenty of indirect connections to be found by using different search terms.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00030001.pdf
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00032300.pdf
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00165526.pdf
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00103831.pdf
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01246908.pdf
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01246905.pdf
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01246905.pdf
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00101928.pdf
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00094883.pdf
dude, Thank You! Greatly appreciate!
I always like to try to save stuff like this to my own drives because censorship is so bad.... 😭🤬can't believe I'm even having to type that.....🤬🤬🤬
EFTA00103831 is a narrative document included in the Epstein file release that argues powerful people have been controlled for decades through sexual blackmail. It does not read like a dry government memo. It reads like a structured accusation. The central idea is that abuse of minors was not just criminal behavior but a tool, and that recordings of that abuse were used to control politicians, judges, and other elites.
The document claims that British intelligence services, particularly MI5, filmed foreign diplomats and high-profile individuals at abuse gatherings in North Wales and kept the recordings for leverage. It presents this as deliberate policy rather than rumor. It then connects that claim to Jeffrey Epstein by pointing out that Epstein’s homes and plane were equipped with hidden cameras. The implication is that Epstein’s operation was not unique but part of a longer pattern in which compromise and recording are used to influence powerful people.
It also alleges that certain lobbyists acted as intermediaries who supplied minors to Members of Parliament in exchange for political influence. This is described as “boys for questions,” meaning sexual access was allegedly traded for favorable parliamentary questions or legislative favors. The document treats this not as gossip but as a transactional model of influence.
Jimmy Savile is portrayed as more than a predator. The document claims he functioned as a supplier within elite circles and suggests that his access to hospitals and proximity to high-level figures protected him. It argues that his wealth and long-term immunity were signs of institutional shielding rather than coincidence. Thomas Hamilton, the Dunblane shooter, is also placed into this framework, with the claim that licensing failures and sealed inquiry documents suggest protection of something larger than incompetence.
The document focuses heavily on sealed records, especially the 100-year sealing order in the Dunblane inquiry. It argues that such sealing was not simply to protect victims but to protect establishment figures. It makes similar claims about Operation Ore, asserting that high-profile suspects were shielded while lower-level individuals were prosecuted.
Another major claim is that elite social networks, including a group called the Speculative Society at Edinburgh University, served as informal coordination hubs connecting judges, politicians, and police. The document suggests that shared membership in these circles enabled quiet suppression of investigations and mutual protection.
Throughout the file, the pattern is consistent. It takes real scandals that are publicly known and connects them into a single structure. That structure is described as a blackmail system built on procurement, recording, protection, and suppression. The document does not present new primary evidence proving centralized control. Instead, it presents a tightly woven narrative arguing that repeated institutional failures are not random but systemic.
In plain terms, the document says this: abuse happened, powerful people were around it, institutions repeatedly failed to stop it, and recordings may have been used to keep those powerful people compliant. It claims this pattern spans decades and multiple countries.