IMHO, was President Trump's "catholic" strategist, Steve Bannon, who influenced Trump in choosing "catholic" Amy. Now, the TRUE Bannon, has been revealed.
I don't agree with Trump. He expects them to vote his way every time just because he appointed them. Their job is to Judge honestly as to how they interpret a law and the constitution. They have voted for his agenda many times. They have some good arguments as to why the specific law Trump used to enact these tariffs is illegal. Appointing a Judge does not entitle you to a rubber stamp vote on every one of your cases. Trump outright says they should be voting Republican every time. That is not their job.
Personally, myself, I would have asked Clarence who the next SC Judges should have been. Pretty sure he would have made better picks.
PDJT's win rate at SCOTUS has been phenomenal, and political leanings shouldn't have much to do with how the justices rule. But at some point, regular Americans have to start wondering why the judiciary seems to be trying to stop the good things this administration is wanting to do for the country.
With that said, the lack of yapping from the left about this means they've secured a mere pyrrhic victory, if one at all.
While I don’t entirely disagree, I also don’t think this is what Trump is quite saying exactly.
“This never happens with Democrats”. His focus seems mostly to be pointing out that one side is consistently and habitually full of people doing “the fair thing” while the other side is consistently a rubber stamp.
While I’m sure he would love to have the rubber stamp like they do as a tool to clean up the filth, he also would probably love to see a two party system that actually plays fairly, as most of us would.
It might be that those Trump-appointed justices did exactly what was required. They stopped the president from using a particular tariff option, however, it has not really stopped anything but it has suggested to the masses that the SCOTUS is not in the pocket of Trump - and he is very cross about it! The theatre will help to reassure the TDS camp while not actually impeding POTUS.
Who recommended them to DJT, put them on the short list? I am sure DJT already has dug into depth all of the justices’ backgrounds, and knows why they are being “influenced”, by whom, and the threats. I am not saying they have to votebin favor of DJT or any other President, but they do have to vote in line with the Constitution and not politics or feeling the President has too much power in “their opinion.” If unable to do so, they must step dpwn.p
Gorsuch was a surprise. A very disappointing one.
Trump's reaction----I am raising tariffs by 10% across the board---and he used a standing LAW to do it. Kek
Indeed
https://greatawakening.win/p/19Ax7PPNg6/i-did-some-digging-on-amy-coneyb/
https://greatawakening.win/p/19AxLOroED/remember-when-people-did-digs-am/
https://greatawakening.win/p/19AxGiCpx0/the-heritage-foundation--why-amy/c/ << keep an eye on The Heritage Foundation. Something tells me they're traitors of the highest order
How did that work out for the Pope who was soooo happy to see the Trump family ?
And Roberts knights of Malta...
Yep , evil has many faces without differences
cabal HQ so badly wants you to focus your ire upon "Israel", anon. What is wrong with you?
I'm too patient.
I believe someone once said "Don't get mad , get even"
😉
IMHO, was President Trump's "catholic" strategist, Steve Bannon, who influenced Trump in choosing "catholic" Amy. Now, the TRUE Bannon, has been revealed.
China's great Leap Forward was betrayed by the gang of six. They were the people on the highest. How so many died.
I don't agree with Trump. He expects them to vote his way every time just because he appointed them. Their job is to Judge honestly as to how they interpret a law and the constitution. They have voted for his agenda many times. They have some good arguments as to why the specific law Trump used to enact these tariffs is illegal. Appointing a Judge does not entitle you to a rubber stamp vote on every one of your cases. Trump outright says they should be voting Republican every time. That is not their job.
Personally, myself, I would have asked Clarence who the next SC Judges should have been. Pretty sure he would have made better picks.
PDJT's win rate at SCOTUS has been phenomenal, and political leanings shouldn't have much to do with how the justices rule. But at some point, regular Americans have to start wondering why the judiciary seems to be trying to stop the good things this administration is wanting to do for the country.
With that said, the lack of yapping from the left about this means they've secured a mere pyrrhic victory, if one at all.
While I don’t entirely disagree, I also don’t think this is what Trump is quite saying exactly.
“This never happens with Democrats”. His focus seems mostly to be pointing out that one side is consistently and habitually full of people doing “the fair thing” while the other side is consistently a rubber stamp.
While I’m sure he would love to have the rubber stamp like they do as a tool to clean up the filth, he also would probably love to see a two party system that actually plays fairly, as most of us would.
Should have appointed Lin wood and Sydney Powell.
I could not believe he appointed ACB.
A good question begs an answer. They too, are not above the law.
SPOT ON!
Needless to say, there is an alternative view.
It might be that those Trump-appointed justices did exactly what was required. They stopped the president from using a particular tariff option, however, it has not really stopped anything but it has suggested to the masses that the SCOTUS is not in the pocket of Trump - and he is very cross about it! The theatre will help to reassure the TDS camp while not actually impeding POTUS.
kek
Who recommended them to DJT, put them on the short list? I am sure DJT already has dug into depth all of the justices’ backgrounds, and knows why they are being “influenced”, by whom, and the threats. I am not saying they have to votebin favor of DJT or any other President, but they do have to vote in line with the Constitution and not politics or feeling the President has too much power in “their opinion.” If unable to do so, they must step dpwn.p
ACB always gave off bad vibes, surprised Kavanaugh was on the right side this time. Gorsuch ruling this way is the real head scratcher.
I just take it for granted that Alito and Gorsuch and Thomas will reliably cut through the crap on all the lawfare.
Gorsuch knows what’s happening. https://youtu.be/KUQEBx9e1yc?si=qa6y6htGQpjayllW