👉🏻 https://x.com/TonySeruga/status/2043733814925766674
👉🏻 https://nitter.net/TonySeruga/status/2043733814925766674
(Copypasta follows.)
For the first time ever, the Vatican has built a Muslim prayer room inside its Apostolic Library.
While Christians are banned from Mecca, while no church stands in Saudi Arabia, and while Europe’s cathedrals are being turned into mosques, Pope Leo XIV rolls out prayer rugs in the heart of Rome.
He’s doing it side-by-side with Amy Pope, the UN’s migration chief and former Obama insider, who runs a billion-dollar machine moving “refugees” across the West.
Together they preach “compassion” — but it’s really globalism disguised as faith.
The UN engineers the migration. The Vatican blesses it. And Western civilization pays for it.
Read: https://rairfoundation.com/vaticans-great-replacement-how-pope-leo-xiv-un/
If Jesus returns today, he would NOT recognize the Roman Catholic Church.
He would see it as every bit corrupt as the Jewish temples and the Pharisees and Sadducee were 2000 years ago.
Building a prayer altar to a pagan god within the walls of a Christian temple would NEVER happen. The pope is corrupt. Everyone should abandon the corrupted church and seek God and Jesus themselves away from the stench.
I love aspects of Catholicism, so don’t get me wrong, but if Jesus had returned a thousand years ago, he’d have asked the same question. (And probably most, if not all, groups of “Protestants”, too. Don’t get me started on what he’d ask me)
I’ll eventually put together a post on it, but the RCC ain’t what the sales pitch gave.
Imho all God’s people need to go back to defining themselves by The Book, rather than by some dogmatic affiliation.
Who controls the Pope??
The factions in the College of Cardinals. As to who controls the Cardinals. Any number of numerous financial, Religious and or secular interests. From the Rothschilds to the Religious Orders, to various secular Governments.
The Papacy can be an immensely powerful position if wielded by a Pope independent of the factions. It just so happens Independent Popes often have very short lifespans. Because that threatens the factions hold on power and influence. Since the independent ones typically are focused on reform and anti-corruption measures
The Liberal Factions of the College have been ascendant for years and hold much of the institutional power in the Church Hierarchy. In part due to Francis. While the Conservative factions maintain a potent but small minority.
Leo was in part a compromise. Exceedingly liberal in many areas. But annoyingly traditional in enough other places to mollify the Conservative Factions for now at least. Keeping them from causing half the problems they gave Francis. The leaks about the acts and behavior of Francis associates came from somewhere after all. He was also American. Which to Donald’s Point was likely meant as an inroad with him.
Jesuits
Big deal. This pales in comparison to the snake church they built. The pope has always been a figurehead for corruption.
Good. Let the Vatican implode from within as they continue to slide down the slippery slope to hell. Ever since (decades ago) the stories broke of pedophile so-called "priests" being relocated within their network (vs being unceremoniously ousted with prejudice) I've harbored no misconception that the Roman/Irish Catholic hierarchy is anything even remotely operating under God's direction. Your average R/IC parishioner trying to maintain a connection to God while navigating the rats' nest that is their "church" leadership is not in the same category as that den of vipers in Rome. Maybe they can erect a statue of baal in the square there while they're at it because, you know, "love is love" and all that. World gone mad.
Pindar laughs with delight...
u/#honkler
The Roman Church fell many centuries ago, when:
The pope attempted to excommunicate Middle Eastern Christians for celebrating Resurrection Day on their traditional calendars (193, Quartodeciman Controversy, Victor I)
The pope claimed ultimate authority over all Christians (450 AD, Leo I)
The pope claimed to take the place of Christ on Earth (492, Gelasius I)
The pope claimed to be inerrant (519, Hormisdas I)
The pope claimed ultimate authority over secular states and all churches (1054, Donation of Constantine, Leo IX)
The pope tried to excommunicate the entire Eastern Church because among other reasons, they didn't accept his dictatorship (1054, Great Schism, Leo IX)
The Catholic Church forbade the translation of the Bible into vernacular languages (1229, Council of Toulouse; and 1546, Council of Trent)
The pope claimed universal headship over the Church (1302 AD, Unam Sanctum, Boniface VIII)
Let's not forget the Rotschilds who funded them all the way back in the day...
you mean in 1832?
People act like the Roths funded the Vatican since forever kek
They got their funding from the people they persecuted and from the blood sweat and tears of their "faithful" stupid slaves for centuries. The poor built that megalith harlot church. The jews were a late addition
Good Point
Uni-pary is also uni-religion.
Disgusting. Will the Muslims build a prayer room for Christians in their mosque? Same difference.
When one considers that the Roman Catholic church created Islam to unify the arabs into an army for the pope but it backfired in epic fashion, top kek truly
I read about this last year. I remember complaining to my church that they are pussies for not speaking out against this.
Https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2025/10/15/vatican-grants-muslim-plea-for-dedicated-prayer-room/
Pope Leo got his wires crossed
It's the Apostasy Library
Well its two sides of the same deception. Maybe catholics will wake up. You church calls you catholic and not Christian.