I guarantee that if something tragic happens with a nuke from Iran (supposedly), the narrative will be this: Trump caused this. Iran did not have a nuke and then he attacked them, and so they went and procured a nuke to defend themselves. This is all Trump's fault.
3... 2... 1...
See, Mom, I'm learning how to think like the Cabal!
I think you are right. After all. everything is ALWAYS Trump's fault. /s
I do tend to think that the nook-truth broke prolly in December 2025. The reasoning for attacking Iran in February was that there was 'new information' that Iran was definitely 'close to having a nuke', so must now definitely be attacked. AndI would like to add that Trump was morally reluctant, but supportive.
Problem was: we had all heard that for over thirty years, and we were like "Lalalalala". Bibi cried Wolf again...."
If you believe that the world is organic, and any government that owns nukes works within the framework of that organic world, with it's diverse ideologies, all working against each other in an organic evil world full of intrinsic, organic hatred, that world would be a very scary place. Indeed, in that world we would do whatever it takes to keep us from "using nukes" or "preventing others from using their nukes." We'd even give up pretty much all of our liberties for any "safety" the government offers.
But if you believe that the world is not organic at all, and indeed, it is controlled by a SINGLE GROUP, running a centuries long movie, working towards a specific ending, then:
"Bring on the nukes"
makes all the sense in the world. Indeed, it's akin to saying "Let's move on to the next act," or "Enjoy the Show"
The more you dig, the more you find that indeed, you are watching a movie. All of our fears of "nukes" and all the other evils are scripted, and/or controlled oppositions. As far as I can find, EVERY SINGLE THING (that makes it into "the News") is scripted (or otherwise is selected and put into the feed because it fits the script). Nothing can stop what is comingbecause everything is scripted, controlled by a single entity, running a program that has been running for a very long time. There is substantial evidence that that program is still running. However, there is also substantial evidence that the Director has changed. Same script, same movie, different Director (thanQ).
From my perspective there are two possibilities (binary). Either we live in an organic world, or we do not.
I suppose it's possible that there is a partially organic world, but that suggests that there is a partially hidden world of control. And if there is a partially hidden control system, why would it's extent ever stop? It's like a metastatic cancer you don't know about. Why would it stop? At some point such a hidden mechanism would have to have grown from smaller to bigger, but at some point it would have to have completed itself to "total control." Thus, the most likely case is either we live in a completely organic world ("cancer free"), or it has been completely controlled for a long time (we are already dead and we just don't know it, because all information is managed and fed to us, keeping the illusion complete). The only third option is that we are currently in the transition zone, but that would be the least likely case by far, and the evidence STRONGLY suggests that the "fully controlled world" is the one we live in; think 1984.
(Coincidentally, the author of 1984 was an agent of (paid for and controlled by) the CIA/DOD. His false premise was that a "fully controlled world" would be seen by it's completeness (One Voice) if only a person would look. What he didn't imagine (or didn't write about) were the mechanisms of how controlled opposition works (One Voice, multiple controlled mouths in "opposition"), which is, coincidentally, how the CIA operates by their own account.).
Indeed, I've written a book on the topic. It's not statements of "what I think," but a list of evidence that shows, beyond a reasonable doubt, that our world is completely controlled on every possible level (EVERYTHING is controlled opposition).
I have theorized along similar lines. the duality also manifests in the Good/Evil paradigm. I believe the Asian yin/yang paradigm also touches upon this. so that at it's fundament, duality is even expressed in our genetic make-up. So for example, just as we cannot have man without woman, we cannot have good without evil - life is suffering, and the evil should teach us to be good - if you get what I mean. This is why the Utopia dreamers are indulging a fantasy, based on a distorted, siloed versions of heaven - it has been extrapolated to mean that heaven, or Utopia, is the only destination (provided you adopt their brand of politics, of course). In Heaven, nobody suffers. Problem is: Hell was always part of the original picture. By pretending that Hell cannot be, the Utopia dreamers are playing at being God, and even God did not manage to remove Lucifer completely (or maybe he never intended to in the first place).
Similarly, one would think that we can't have control without controlled opposition (even as it is an intelligence construct), as the controllers try to control the organic decentralized life via such an artificial mechanism. the problem with this flawed theory is that he organic-ness happens just outside the controller's grasp. [Heeeheee]. The issue here is that the population is awakening to the ruse. Pepes can just about smell the glowing feds these days, when they come online with their narratives. You can gauge the ineffectiveness of the ruse by the speed at which the mocking starts in the comment sections, and the fact that the comment section is controlled in its own right. Censorship is the globalist's last stand.
The true, organic opposition appears subtler, as it is drowned out by the controlled opposition in a virtual world, simply because the latter is louder. However, organic opposition is far more ancient and stronger, as is based on relationships, and what is currently termed networking. You see, the controlled opposition is one-dimensional. It has only one point of control - e.g. Reuters.
For an example of how relationships are the difference: witness how fast FB community groups will rally around the 'right' thing, or how groups can have activists who are mocked openly, or that some arsehole starts doxxing, and then swiftly gets banned.
My point is, the pepes are standing up. As an example of organic resistance, my son recently stopped a bullying session on facebook (would you have?), after he found out that the lady who was being dogpiled (she was a contestant in a beauty pageant) did it for her family - and her father was dying from cancer, so her claim to fame meant a lot to them - pictures of her parents crying because she got into the finals. He flagged the posts which were literally saying that she was ugly (she was not, one of his retaliatory comments was: She is prettier than your wife) and got the ugly behaviour removed, and then he sent the girl a supportive message. Within minutes the ugliness was righted. It was a small step for man and a leap for mankind. Note that he is not a moderator or anything, just a member of the public. So you see, one can turn their censorship into a weapon to fight back. Just make a decent, moral case, and the fat comtollers can't disagree. If FB don't react properly, they will face consequences - just like Noblesse Oblige was a thing. And so, we circle back to the medieval Good/Evil paradigm.
You sound like you're assuming you won't be on the outer edge of one of the areas hit. What if it's you who won't get to enjoy the brave new world because you are suffering from severe burns and radiation poisoning? I have a better idea. Let's prevent the Islamic Republic from getting nukes and Let's stop pressuring Trump to "not do regime change" and let him finish the job so the Iranian people can rebuild a country that contributes to the world.
You sound like you're assuming you won't be on the outer edge of one of the areas hit.
Nothing could be further from the truth. I know where I live. If America is bombed, I'd guess there is a really good chance (probably 2-5%?) that that is exactly what will happen.
Having said that, I doubt America will be bombed by a nuke. I doubt that ANYONE will be bombed by a nuke. I don't think that's part of The Plan. I'm not saying it can't happen. It's not my movie. But a nuke isn't necessary, and thus is unlikely. A nuclear threat on the other hand (Cuban Missile Crisis style), is very likely imo.
What if it's you who won't get to enjoy the brave new world
Excepting a couple people, everyone else around me has died in the past few years (since Covid). I'm flirting with Death myself, and He clearly thinks I'm cute. This war has been brutal from my perspective. I hope to survive to the end of it, I do have reasons to hope, and I work towards it every day, but there's a good chance that I will miss the end credits.
But this isn't about a "brave new world." This isn't about you or me. This is about SHOWING HUMANITY that we currently live in Hell, and have for a very long time. That Hell is a Veil; an illusion; a fraud. That Veil is being lifted.
Clearly some people haven't yet gotten the memo.
But they will. That's the point. If that requires a nuke, so be it. Worse things could happen. Worse things have happened. Worse things are already happening!!.
The Veil, and what lies behind it, is worse than you can imagine. We live a beshackled existence, forced to look at the shadows within Plato's Cave. We don't even know what color is. Whatever it takes to show color to the world; to provide some appreciation for the true dimensionality of our existence; that is all that matters. A few lives, some residual casualties; that is irrelevant to the broader scope of what's coming. It's not a "brave new world," it's a world with COLOR.
I can see the color. For me, the Veil has already lifted. But not everyone can yet.
If my demise or radiation poisoning is part of the price required for others to see what lies on the other side, I am happy to pay my portion of it. (Well, maybe not "happy," but I accept it with gratitude.)
We all go to Source in the end anyways. What we do with our Experience (however it manifests), and our appreciation (a continual state of choice) of the nuances of our Experience, is what matters.
In Truth, we already commune with Source (Heaven is within you already), but the Veil occludes our ability to see what we already know to be True. That is what we are working towards, and why any price is both worth paying (our unique Experience is precious) and at the same time minimal; both transitory and eternal; a matter of Scope.
Hear hear. We are all going to die. Might as well die gloriously. We must not fear death. I believe that the fear of death is being heavily manipulated.
He lives. So that should serve as an example, if it hasn't already.
Let's not. Islam and Christianity are closer together than you have been led to believe. As in: Jesus is well respected in both faiths - an understatement, but this fact underpins a deeper truth that some faiths actually don't like what Jesus did, and try to make us think that Jesus was a retarded brown person with a squint.
Why, exactly do Iranians need regime change? Please be specific. OK, so you don't agree with THEIR brand of monotheism, then disagree, but that is not a reason to start throwing bombs. If the Iranian people want regime change, they do actually have elections. So let them sort that out on their own - they do not need to be told what to do by Uncle Sam.
Anyway, let's just understand that North Korea has not been invaded for a reason, oh and something something stop the spread of Communism, let's teach those Norks a lesson, once and for all (US/Korea war). And that turned into: Yeah maybe let's not, 'cos they now have nukes.
If Iran has nukes as claimed, then that's a good thing actually. Now, maybe the Globalists won't try it on, against Iran (again), - and just as an aside: the strait was open before all these shenanigans, so that reason is a moot point - not a reason for invasion, no matter what the media says. PAkistan has nukes. Why is USA letting them have them? North Korea is a tiny blip of a country, and they have nukes, and nothing could stop them having them. And guess what? they have not thrown them at anyone (side-eyes at country who has documentedly thrown TWO of them at another country).
Just pointing this out, because there was never a historical precedent of Iran 'needing to be invaded' but somehow, someone gets a bright idea to do it. They say that Afghanistan was the graveyard of Empires - we can cite all the powers that tried, and guess what: Afghanistan used to be Persia before the 20th C. So, heads up: Iran still is a remnant of Persia. Really? Are we really going to do this? Apparently so.
If the hypothetical aggressor 'finishes the job' as you suggest (Final solutionists are always so strident), then there won't be a country to rebuild, silly. At that point it is just a stupid war over a mountainous land that is covered in ash. No people. No problem: we will just plant some Africans or Indians there, right? Ukraine is doing so well.
OK, I get that you are referring to a Trump peaceful solution, and I am rooting for that. Maybe I am objecting to your absolutist language - is that really all we have devolved to? I guess pictures of Gaza no longer make an impression, because they were all bad people anyway? /s
I think the ante needs to be raised. Demonstration is not a threat; it is just showmanship. Who is threatened? By what? They use up a resource in theatrics to terrorize the wimpy world and instill fear, which they hope will cause a retreat.
I lately read a new translation of Sun Tzu's "The Art of War," and it seems the only workable strategy is the very American poker play of "I'll see your card and raise you one." In this case, i think it should be along the lines of "If you detonate a nuclear device on your territory, we will follow suit. And the location will be Qom. If we succeed, it will be ABSOLUTE PROOF that Allah is against you. Your play. Get rolling." And publicize the counter-threat widely, so the whole Moslem world is on notice. Sun Tzu: seize or threaten something your enemy cherishes. (For those who are puzzled, Qom is to Shia Islam much as Mecca is to Sunni Islam. By all accounts a beautiful city, but the issue transcends beauty.)
Nuclear combat is not for the faint of heart. If we make it plain that any effort on their part to detonate a bomb will result in the effective destruction of their own religion, that may give them pause. And, if they go ahead, our doing so would demolish the religious credibility of Shia Islam, and destroy the legitimacy of the IRGC / mullah combine. Now you can begin to appreciate the guts that Harry Truman had in ordering the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
No, the claim comes from Pepe Escobar (who moves in all sorts of ARC intelligence circles), and was later validated by Larry Johnson (whose sources are preddy extensive too, but tend to Western Hemisphere/South America). The latter broke the nook-news last week. Furthermore, Redacted tend to be thorough in their research - they don't tend to do lies - so you can see them as more mainstream than simple podcasters.
If the story is true, it explains some of the 'odd habbenings' in this Iran war. I suspect this news was why USA and Israel popped off in February, TBH.
If true, the story explains the muted tempo, because Israelis contemplated using nukes (Final solution comments, early on), but then decided not to, and then agreed to a 'ceasefire' after the first fury. (But then the hardliners decided to take out their aggression that was blunted on Iran, in a bit of Hezbollah Gaza treatment). Yeah, so Iran said "Lebanon is included too".
So we are in for another week of bombing again, 'cos Iran ain't backin' down/.
The nook-troof explains the sudden, recent removals of Mossad heads, also. It also explains the Trump "You are F*cking crazy" outburst aimed to Bibi.
Does Iran already have a nuclear weapon? That is the explosive question now being raised by multiple intelligence sources, former officials, and analysts — and if true, it would completely change the balance of power in the Middle East.
For weeks, strange signals have been coming out of Washington, Tehran, and Tel Aviv. President Trump talked about collecting Iran’s “nuclear dust.” Iran suddenly hardened its position on future talks, saying its nuclear program was no longer up for discussion. And inside Israel, top intelligence officials are being removed after what may be one of the biggest intelligence failures in modern history.
It seems so. I think everyone was deaf due to the frantication (i.e. Iran is close to having a nookoolear bomb) from Bibi that has been documented for over 30 years.
Given that all the countries in the region that "do not" have nukes actually have nukes or use proxies with defensive agreements (eg Pakistan with Saudi Arabia) then this is not surprising if it is true.
The fear with N. Korea was they would be able to put nukes on ballistic missiles that would be able to hit the N. American continent. So it comes down to an arms race from escalating any further even if Iran does have nukes.
Agreed. Furthermore, Persia has been a goal for Globalist empires since the dawn of time. Read all about it in the chronicles of Alexander the Great, for example. (pro-tip: he didn't manage it).
What would anyone do in the face of heavily armed, slightly unhinged neignbors? So even the most religious sect in Iran was only able to hold back nook-tech for a small window of time.
I can't believe you would sticky this bullsh1t from Redacted especially coming from Larry Johnson. Redacted imho is not a credible source.
Are you sure this is Redacted? I thought it might have been Retarded, but I could be wrong...
to-may-to to-mah-to
Linguistically, I approve this articulation. Updoogle.
Whatever,
Nothing but love mate. Nothing personal.
I don’t trust these sources, I trust God and his son Jesus. President Trump was sent by God so I trust him as well.
🙏
I guarantee that if something tragic happens with a nuke from Iran (supposedly), the narrative will be this: Trump caused this. Iran did not have a nuke and then he attacked them, and so they went and procured a nuke to defend themselves. This is all Trump's fault.
3... 2... 1...
See, Mom, I'm learning how to think like the Cabal!
I think you are right. After all. everything is ALWAYS Trump's fault. /s
I do tend to think that the nook-truth broke prolly in December 2025. The reasoning for attacking Iran in February was that there was 'new information' that Iran was definitely 'close to having a nuke', so must now definitely be attacked. AndI would like to add that Trump was morally reluctant, but supportive.
Problem was: we had all heard that for over thirty years, and we were like "Lalalalala". Bibi cried Wolf again...."
You can't have an apocalypse without nukes. They had to come out to play eventually.
BRING ON THE NUKES.
Let's get this show on the road!
What a ridiculous comment
I guess it depends on your premises.
If you believe that the world is organic, and any government that owns nukes works within the framework of that organic world, with it's diverse ideologies, all working against each other in an organic evil world full of intrinsic, organic hatred, that world would be a very scary place. Indeed, in that world we would do whatever it takes to keep us from "using nukes" or "preventing others from using their nukes." We'd even give up pretty much all of our liberties for any "safety" the government offers.
But if you believe that the world is not organic at all, and indeed, it is controlled by a SINGLE GROUP, running a centuries long movie, working towards a specific ending, then:
"Bring on the nukes"
makes all the sense in the world. Indeed, it's akin to saying "Let's move on to the next act," or "Enjoy the Show"
The more you dig, the more you find that indeed, you are watching a movie. All of our fears of "nukes" and all the other evils are scripted, and/or controlled oppositions. As far as I can find, EVERY SINGLE THING (that makes it into "the News") is scripted (or otherwise is selected and put into the feed because it fits the script). Nothing can stop what is coming because everything is scripted, controlled by a single entity, running a program that has been running for a very long time. There is substantial evidence that that program is still running. However, there is also substantial evidence that the Director has changed. Same script, same movie, different Director (thanQ).
So yes,
On with the show!
And grab some popcorn. You're gonna need a ton.
Ridiculous false dichotomy.
You've presented a claim, but it's a claim without support. It's nothing but a meaningless statement without elaboration.
I think it is fairly obvious there are more than only the two possibilities as you have presented them.
Maybe. But maybe not.
From my perspective there are two possibilities (binary). Either we live in an organic world, or we do not.
I suppose it's possible that there is a partially organic world, but that suggests that there is a partially hidden world of control. And if there is a partially hidden control system, why would it's extent ever stop? It's like a metastatic cancer you don't know about. Why would it stop? At some point such a hidden mechanism would have to have grown from smaller to bigger, but at some point it would have to have completed itself to "total control." Thus, the most likely case is either we live in a completely organic world ("cancer free"), or it has been completely controlled for a long time (we are already dead and we just don't know it, because all information is managed and fed to us, keeping the illusion complete). The only third option is that we are currently in the transition zone, but that would be the least likely case by far, and the evidence STRONGLY suggests that the "fully controlled world" is the one we live in; think 1984.
(Coincidentally, the author of 1984 was an agent of (paid for and controlled by) the CIA/DOD. His false premise was that a "fully controlled world" would be seen by it's completeness (One Voice) if only a person would look. What he didn't imagine (or didn't write about) were the mechanisms of how controlled opposition works (One Voice, multiple controlled mouths in "opposition"), which is, coincidentally, how the CIA operates by their own account.).
Indeed, I've written a book on the topic. It's not statements of "what I think," but a list of evidence that shows, beyond a reasonable doubt, that our world is completely controlled on every possible level (EVERYTHING is controlled opposition).
The love between my child and I is engineered by those in control? They do a good job and I'll keep subscribing.
I have theorized along similar lines. the duality also manifests in the Good/Evil paradigm. I believe the Asian yin/yang paradigm also touches upon this. so that at it's fundament, duality is even expressed in our genetic make-up. So for example, just as we cannot have man without woman, we cannot have good without evil - life is suffering, and the evil should teach us to be good - if you get what I mean. This is why the Utopia dreamers are indulging a fantasy, based on a distorted, siloed versions of heaven - it has been extrapolated to mean that heaven, or Utopia, is the only destination (provided you adopt their brand of politics, of course). In Heaven, nobody suffers. Problem is: Hell was always part of the original picture. By pretending that Hell cannot be, the Utopia dreamers are playing at being God, and even God did not manage to remove Lucifer completely (or maybe he never intended to in the first place).
Similarly, one would think that we can't have control without controlled opposition (even as it is an intelligence construct), as the controllers try to control the organic decentralized life via such an artificial mechanism. the problem with this flawed theory is that he organic-ness happens just outside the controller's grasp. [Heeeheee]. The issue here is that the population is awakening to the ruse. Pepes can just about smell the glowing feds these days, when they come online with their narratives. You can gauge the ineffectiveness of the ruse by the speed at which the mocking starts in the comment sections, and the fact that the comment section is controlled in its own right. Censorship is the globalist's last stand.
The true, organic opposition appears subtler, as it is drowned out by the controlled opposition in a virtual world, simply because the latter is louder. However, organic opposition is far more ancient and stronger, as is based on relationships, and what is currently termed networking. You see, the controlled opposition is one-dimensional. It has only one point of control - e.g. Reuters.
For an example of how relationships are the difference: witness how fast FB community groups will rally around the 'right' thing, or how groups can have activists who are mocked openly, or that some arsehole starts doxxing, and then swiftly gets banned.
My point is, the pepes are standing up. As an example of organic resistance, my son recently stopped a bullying session on facebook (would you have?), after he found out that the lady who was being dogpiled (she was a contestant in a beauty pageant) did it for her family - and her father was dying from cancer, so her claim to fame meant a lot to them - pictures of her parents crying because she got into the finals. He flagged the posts which were literally saying that she was ugly (she was not, one of his retaliatory comments was: She is prettier than your wife) and got the ugly behaviour removed, and then he sent the girl a supportive message. Within minutes the ugliness was righted. It was a small step for man and a leap for mankind. Note that he is not a moderator or anything, just a member of the public. So you see, one can turn their censorship into a weapon to fight back. Just make a decent, moral case, and the fat comtollers can't disagree. If FB don't react properly, they will face consequences - just like Noblesse Oblige was a thing. And so, we circle back to the medieval Good/Evil paradigm.
You sound like you're assuming you won't be on the outer edge of one of the areas hit. What if it's you who won't get to enjoy the brave new world because you are suffering from severe burns and radiation poisoning? I have a better idea. Let's prevent the Islamic Republic from getting nukes and Let's stop pressuring Trump to "not do regime change" and let him finish the job so the Iranian people can rebuild a country that contributes to the world.
But if it's God's Will, Trump will succeed, but in 2 Peter 3:10-13 God Promises a "New Earth".
Nothing could be further from the truth. I know where I live. If America is bombed, I'd guess there is a really good chance (probably 2-5%?) that that is exactly what will happen.
Having said that, I doubt America will be bombed by a nuke. I doubt that ANYONE will be bombed by a nuke. I don't think that's part of The Plan. I'm not saying it can't happen. It's not my movie. But a nuke isn't necessary, and thus is unlikely. A nuclear threat on the other hand (Cuban Missile Crisis style), is very likely imo.
Excepting a couple people, everyone else around me has died in the past few years (since Covid). I'm flirting with Death myself, and He clearly thinks I'm cute. This war has been brutal from my perspective. I hope to survive to the end of it, I do have reasons to hope, and I work towards it every day, but there's a good chance that I will miss the end credits.
But this isn't about a "brave new world." This isn't about you or me. This is about SHOWING HUMANITY that we currently live in Hell, and have for a very long time. That Hell is a Veil; an illusion; a fraud. That Veil is being lifted.
Clearly some people haven't yet gotten the memo.
But they will. That's the point. If that requires a nuke, so be it. Worse things could happen. Worse things have happened. Worse things are already happening!!.
The Veil, and what lies behind it, is worse than you can imagine. We live a beshackled existence, forced to look at the shadows within Plato's Cave. We don't even know what color is. Whatever it takes to show color to the world; to provide some appreciation for the true dimensionality of our existence; that is all that matters. A few lives, some residual casualties; that is irrelevant to the broader scope of what's coming. It's not a "brave new world," it's a world with COLOR.
I can see the color. For me, the Veil has already lifted. But not everyone can yet.
If my demise or radiation poisoning is part of the price required for others to see what lies on the other side, I am happy to pay my portion of it. (Well, maybe not "happy," but I accept it with gratitude.)
We all go to Source in the end anyways. What we do with our Experience (however it manifests), and our appreciation (a continual state of choice) of the nuances of our Experience, is what matters.
In Truth, we already commune with Source (Heaven is within you already), but the Veil occludes our ability to see what we already know to be True. That is what we are working towards, and why any price is both worth paying (our unique Experience is precious) and at the same time minimal; both transitory and eternal; a matter of Scope.
Hear hear. We are all going to die. Might as well die gloriously. We must not fear death. I believe that the fear of death is being heavily manipulated.
He lives. So that should serve as an example, if it hasn't already.
Let's not. Islam and Christianity are closer together than you have been led to believe. As in: Jesus is well respected in both faiths - an understatement, but this fact underpins a deeper truth that some faiths actually don't like what Jesus did, and try to make us think that Jesus was a retarded brown person with a squint.
Why, exactly do Iranians need regime change? Please be specific. OK, so you don't agree with THEIR brand of monotheism, then disagree, but that is not a reason to start throwing bombs. If the Iranian people want regime change, they do actually have elections. So let them sort that out on their own - they do not need to be told what to do by Uncle Sam.
Anyway, let's just understand that North Korea has not been invaded for a reason, oh and something something stop the spread of Communism, let's teach those Norks a lesson, once and for all (US/Korea war). And that turned into: Yeah maybe let's not, 'cos they now have nukes.
If Iran has nukes as claimed, then that's a good thing actually. Now, maybe the Globalists won't try it on, against Iran (again), - and just as an aside: the strait was open before all these shenanigans, so that reason is a moot point - not a reason for invasion, no matter what the media says. PAkistan has nukes. Why is USA letting them have them? North Korea is a tiny blip of a country, and they have nukes, and nothing could stop them having them. And guess what? they have not thrown them at anyone (side-eyes at country who has documentedly thrown TWO of them at another country).
Just pointing this out, because there was never a historical precedent of Iran 'needing to be invaded' but somehow, someone gets a bright idea to do it. They say that Afghanistan was the graveyard of Empires - we can cite all the powers that tried, and guess what: Afghanistan used to be Persia before the 20th C. So, heads up: Iran still is a remnant of Persia. Really? Are we really going to do this? Apparently so.
If the hypothetical aggressor 'finishes the job' as you suggest (Final solutionists are always so strident), then there won't be a country to rebuild, silly. At that point it is just a stupid war over a mountainous land that is covered in ash. No people. No problem: we will just plant some Africans or Indians there, right? Ukraine is doing so well.
OK, I get that you are referring to a Trump peaceful solution, and I am rooting for that. Maybe I am objecting to your absolutist language - is that really all we have devolved to? I guess pictures of Gaza no longer make an impression, because they were all bad people anyway? /s
Man you'd never have convinced me 5 years ago this is what we'd see on this site
Monkey Werx posted a YT of nuke sniffer plane activity about 6 hours ago
https://youtu.be/f0DuwTviMDk?si=TY0U0MCXh_VuE-jY
They are always up. So what?
I think the ante needs to be raised. Demonstration is not a threat; it is just showmanship. Who is threatened? By what? They use up a resource in theatrics to terrorize the wimpy world and instill fear, which they hope will cause a retreat.
I lately read a new translation of Sun Tzu's "The Art of War," and it seems the only workable strategy is the very American poker play of "I'll see your card and raise you one." In this case, i think it should be along the lines of "If you detonate a nuclear device on your territory, we will follow suit. And the location will be Qom. If we succeed, it will be ABSOLUTE PROOF that Allah is against you. Your play. Get rolling." And publicize the counter-threat widely, so the whole Moslem world is on notice. Sun Tzu: seize or threaten something your enemy cherishes. (For those who are puzzled, Qom is to Shia Islam much as Mecca is to Sunni Islam. By all accounts a beautiful city, but the issue transcends beauty.)
Nuclear combat is not for the faint of heart. If we make it plain that any effort on their part to detonate a bomb will result in the effective destruction of their own religion, that may give them pause. And, if they go ahead, our doing so would demolish the religious credibility of Shia Islam, and destroy the legitimacy of the IRGC / mullah combine. Now you can begin to appreciate the guts that Harry Truman had in ordering the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Ritter is the source?
No, the claim comes from Pepe Escobar (who moves in all sorts of ARC intelligence circles), and was later validated by Larry Johnson (whose sources are preddy extensive too, but tend to Western Hemisphere/South America). The latter broke the nook-news last week. Furthermore, Redacted tend to be thorough in their research - they don't tend to do lies - so you can see them as more mainstream than simple podcasters.
If the story is true, it explains some of the 'odd habbenings' in this Iran war. I suspect this news was why USA and Israel popped off in February, TBH.
If true, the story explains the muted tempo, because Israelis contemplated using nukes (Final solution comments, early on), but then decided not to, and then agreed to a 'ceasefire' after the first fury. (But then the hardliners decided to take out their aggression that was blunted on Iran, in a bit of Hezbollah Gaza treatment). Yeah, so Iran said "Lebanon is included too".
So we are in for another week of bombing again, 'cos Iran ain't backin' down/.
The nook-troof explains the sudden, recent removals of Mossad heads, also. It also explains the Trump "You are F*cking crazy" outburst aimed to Bibi.
Grin. I listened far enough to hear scott Ritter and said nope.
Is he based in Pakistan?
Larry is in Florida, and Pepe travels around, I think he is at the SPIEF at the mo.
Lmaooooo this is peak numbskull behavior
IRAQ HAS WMDS!!!1!1
If Iran had a nuclear bomb the USA would have an aircraft carrier at the bottom of the Hormuz Strait!
Not sure of your causal logic?
They would USE A BOMB if they had it.
They said they are ready to test one.
They wouldn't lie would they? Kek
Yes well everybody is lying, so the trick is to watch their behaviour.
Redacted is fun to listen to, but they are very often full of baloney
Wow really? Like DJT and Intel didn’t know that? A little late to the news cycle.
It seems so. I think everyone was deaf due to the frantication (i.e. Iran is close to having a nookoolear bomb) from Bibi that has been documented for over 30 years.
Refer to Peter and the Wolf stories.
Given that all the countries in the region that "do not" have nukes actually have nukes or use proxies with defensive agreements (eg Pakistan with Saudi Arabia) then this is not surprising if it is true.
The fear with N. Korea was they would be able to put nukes on ballistic missiles that would be able to hit the N. American continent. So it comes down to an arms race from escalating any further even if Iran does have nukes.
Agreed. Furthermore, Persia has been a goal for Globalist empires since the dawn of time. Read all about it in the chronicles of Alexander the Great, for example. (pro-tip: he didn't manage it).
What would anyone do in the face of heavily armed, slightly unhinged neignbors? So even the most religious sect in Iran was only able to hold back nook-tech for a small window of time.