they "declined" to show up twice I believe. They should have had a bench warrant issued the first time. I would have gotten one over a traffic ticket, but they just said no, I'm busy.
This is from January this year, the resolution to hold them in contempt advanced, and just before it was voted on, the Clintons reversed course and complied (although only under penalty of being charged with contempt of congress.)
I mean, if you've been on Iwa Jima drinking coconuts for 5 months, I'd accept it, but how does anyone here not realize this already? Old.
Well, there is nothing wrong with that. But in that case, he should indicate the context, time, etc.
In his post, he writes: The House WILL BE moving forward .... which is simply a lie. This issue was taking place. and the house will NOT be doing this..... Not to mention, "let's freaking go!". It's pure fabrication, and gasligthing.
To bring the narrative back, the facts become relevant. "This is what the Clinton's did.... This is what happened... Will the Clintons be held for their crimes? Etc"
But this is a very simply misrepresentation of the truth. Is it wrong for the MSM propaganda to tell fake news to manipulate people but for us its OK?
G'day fren. Yup I hear you and agree, but when you see special people firing in a certain direction reckon it's good to aim that way also.
It is quick fire times too. Seems we just see the back of one narrative push, then on to the next. I.e Tina Peters to Tulsi/Starmer and probs now to Burnham. Cheers.π«‘
I think I get it. However, for some time now, I have strongly felt that the real threat to the Awakening movement is not the MSM, but the infiltration of alt-media and truther sphere of grifters, clickers, controlled ops and inflooencers who downgrade the quality of the signal with garbage info that gets them what they want (whatever their objective is, clicks, disinfo, control) at the expense of informational veracity.
The only real defense against the aforementioned elements is a rigorous and diligent application of critical thinking and scrupulous attention to not accepting low grade stuff, simply because it ticks a few biases.
I think I can resonate with your reasons for posting this, but I disagree with the approach (either engaged with in ignorance or deliberately) of the OP. I personally think that its damaging, in the long run, to our overall objectives - if that objective is truth and accountability.
By the way, congratulations (commiserations) on being inducted into an eclectic group of frogs. May you live not to regret it!!!!
Whoa....slow down there do-nuthins....you better think this over for another year or so.....
How to recognize a grifty clickbait account:
Various methods exist, but one obvious tell is posting old, old news as if its breaking while NOT providing dates, context that reveals its age.
This newsmax report from January 2026. Five months ago.
Clickbait, and not worthy of GAW, imo. (Talking about the X post, not the frog that posted this.)
Lock them up... in the SAME jail cell.
It won't take a day for Bill Clinton to crack.
Or get suicided.
Bill might have to rape his wife for a change.
That's for sure...πΈ
uhm ,i think they both showed up ,this is old i believe
And the OG entheos is not on Xβ¦. I donβt know who this one isβ¦ joined in February of this year.
the posts here are always old rehashed shite
they "declined" to show up twice I believe. They should have had a bench warrant issued the first time. I would have gotten one over a traffic ticket, but they just said no, I'm busy.
DON'T let that bitch run in 2028!!! A 4 time LOSER!!!
u/#jail
Between Burchett and Gill we got a draw for MVP (most vociferous politician).
Your lips to Godβs ears. They canβt even get those called by subpoenas to show up.
All about the timing fren.
In this case, the timing is about 5 months too late. This is a story that was run in January.
Spoiler alert: they showed up, and complied with the subpoena.
Itβs about time!
Blah, blah, blah strong letter will follow
Are people not paying attention?
This is from January this year, the resolution to hold them in contempt advanced, and just before it was voted on, the Clintons reversed course and complied (although only under penalty of being charged with contempt of congress.)
I mean, if you've been on Iwa Jima drinking coconuts for 5 months, I'd accept it, but how does anyone here not realize this already? Old.
Think Enthios is trying to get the narrative back into peoples minds... plus share hope.
Well, there is nothing wrong with that. But in that case, he should indicate the context, time, etc.
In his post, he writes: The House WILL BE moving forward .... which is simply a lie. This issue was taking place. and the house will NOT be doing this..... Not to mention, "let's freaking go!". It's pure fabrication, and gasligthing.
To bring the narrative back, the facts become relevant. "This is what the Clinton's did.... This is what happened... Will the Clintons be held for their crimes? Etc"
But this is a very simply misrepresentation of the truth. Is it wrong for the MSM propaganda to tell fake news to manipulate people but for us its OK?
G'day fren. Yup I hear you and agree, but when you see special people firing in a certain direction reckon it's good to aim that way also. It is quick fire times too. Seems we just see the back of one narrative push, then on to the next. I.e Tina Peters to Tulsi/Starmer and probs now to Burnham. Cheers.π«‘
Thanks Psi.
I think I get it. However, for some time now, I have strongly felt that the real threat to the Awakening movement is not the MSM, but the infiltration of alt-media and truther sphere of grifters, clickers, controlled ops and inflooencers who downgrade the quality of the signal with garbage info that gets them what they want (whatever their objective is, clicks, disinfo, control) at the expense of informational veracity.
The only real defense against the aforementioned elements is a rigorous and diligent application of critical thinking and scrupulous attention to not accepting low grade stuff, simply because it ticks a few biases.
I think I can resonate with your reasons for posting this, but I disagree with the approach (either engaged with in ignorance or deliberately) of the OP. I personally think that its damaging, in the long run, to our overall objectives - if that objective is truth and accountability.
By the way, congratulations (commiserations) on being inducted into an eclectic group of frogs. May you live not to regret it!!!!
(But seriously, thank you for stepping up. o7)