I'm not sure about the BRIC+ part, but overall this makes sense. Why destroy these institutions altogether, which would cause harm to Americans, when they can be gutted and reformed, then used as a weapon against the cabal.
When people hear BlackRock, they immediately think evil... they said the same thing about Palantir...
They saw the machine as it once operated and assumed it could only ever serve the same master...
Then came EO 13818...
Presume the command layer was captured while the machinery remained intact... because continuity of government does not destroy systems this large... it secures them, keeps them functioning and redirects their capacity...
Now listen to this video through that lens...
Larry Fink says America has underinvested in its power grid... permitting is slowing expansion... Texas is winning because capital can move... and the nation must build faster...
Trump has already said corporations will fund the new American stack...
AI... data centers... energy... transmission... manufacturing... defense... all connected through the same physical infrastructure...
BlackRock does not create most of this money... it organizes and routes capital from pensions, corporations, insurance funds, sovereign wealth and institutional investors...
That is the value of the machine...
Palantir organizes the data... BlackRock organizes the capital... government clears the barriers... corporations fund the buildout... and American workers construct the infrastructure beneath the next economy...
Seen through the old lens, BlackRock is moving toward the grid... but seen through EO 13818 and continuity of government, the capital-routing engine is being moved toward rebuilding America...
Listen again... the machine may look the same... but the mission has changed... read below...
How is this even possible? For this to happen - the government takes over corporations and forces them to abide by the governments will, there would have to be unequivocal evidence of the ENTIRE corporations corruption. I'm talking all executives, entire board, etc.
And this theory is being presented so nonchalantly. Like, "Yeah, the US government has taken control of these Fortune 100 companies. No big deal "
I'm reminded of a crazy ex girlfriend who wants something and so I work hard to give it to her- and when she gets it she's mad at me because she didn't like how I got it.
Sounds like my ultra-lib, whacked out of her gord leftist ex-gf kek. Don't take in the substance of what I say to you, just get mad at how I said it to you.
Yes, it matters if you are trying to get across to them. The psychology of influence holds that to be heard and understood by anyone we need to first speak their language. This isn't referring to dialect, of course.
Now, If you are trying to maintain some abusive advantage over a person, then I don't know about that. That isn't what I'm talking about.
Thanks for this encouraging post.
How many of your base, are belong to us?
👉ALL👈
u/#catdance
I had a feeling that they had been captured. Strategy demanded it.
Me too.
Make sense.
You don't get rid of the United States cause it was corrupted.
You get rid of the corruption.
I'm not sure about the BRIC+ part, but overall this makes sense. Why destroy these institutions altogether, which would cause harm to Americans, when they can be gutted and reformed, then used as a weapon against the cabal.
God used Babylon, Persia, and Assyria. Why not Blackrock, Palantir, and everyone else?
🎯🎯🎯
I think this was done in Trump's first term .... treasury & Blackrock ... meanwhile Powell did some things .... think coco-bonds[^1] and other stuff.
Some banks were rug pulled.
Then the yield curve control (both ends) & slow squeezing the Yen carry trade.
Then in came doge, squeezing the first monies out -> certain assets dropped 50%. Then USAID was squeezed .... Cartels + proxies were squeezed
Then Venezuela and Iran ....
Interesting how this works.
EO#: 13818 (1st term)
https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-13818-blocking-the-property-persons-involved-serious-human-rights-abuse-or
FULLTEXT
How is this even possible? For this to happen - the government takes over corporations and forces them to abide by the governments will, there would have to be unequivocal evidence of the ENTIRE corporations corruption. I'm talking all executives, entire board, etc.
And this theory is being presented so nonchalantly. Like, "Yeah, the US government has taken control of these Fortune 100 companies. No big deal "
What the fuck. Where's the sauce?
The constant use of ellipses is obnoxious. If you have something to say, say it with confidence. This is not the endearing kind of quirky.
Probably got a good deal on them buying in bulk
Well, X used to be Twitter that banned conservatives but now is red-pilling like there's no tomorrow. So I guess it's a possibility to consider.
And company Deep Staters don't know WHO to trust or where they can hide at this point. Controlled demolition/capturing assets IS a fact of war.
As nice as this sounds im still not going to trust the megacorporations
nice view! since much better too for Blackrock and Palantir to go with a freedom world order than the communist alternative
That’s like saying let’s implement fascism to show people that fascism is wrong
I've heard that theory bandied about here a ton over the years.
I'm reminded of a crazy ex girlfriend who wants something and so I work hard to give it to her- and when she gets it she's mad at me because she didn't like how I got it.
Sounds like my ultra-lib, whacked out of her gord leftist ex-gf kek. Don't take in the substance of what I say to you, just get mad at how I said it to you.
To be fair, how we say things is also what we are saying. Don't wanna drown out the message when its delivery is a distraction.
Does it matter when speaking with individuals whose minds are addled by conflabulation?
Self censoring in order to placate is often abused by those you intend to please.
Yes, it matters if you are trying to get across to them. The psychology of influence holds that to be heard and understood by anyone we need to first speak their language. This isn't referring to dialect, of course.
Now, If you are trying to maintain some abusive advantage over a person, then I don't know about that. That isn't what I'm talking about.