It has always been authorized. Your rights come from our Creator, and the right to self-defense is first, and foremost or them.
The Secret Service is 100% to blame and fully responsible and accountable for President Trump being shot. Personally, I believe it was a deliberate thing, not an accident or mistake. They have had the protection mission since 1901. The only job they have is protecting people. There is no way they made this many "mistakes" on a protection op like this. The venue was easily protected, but they failed to do even the most basic of things to secure it.
Actually, once they took them from all the "law abiding" they would just double down on the outlaws since there would no longer be anyone to oppose them.
Our right to bear arms and defend ourselves comes form our Creator, not the Constitution. The 2nd amendment is a prohibition against government infringement of that preexisting right.
So, her executive action doesn't amount to a can of beans when God gave us the right and liberty to bear arms and defend against rogue government.
Executive Orders have no standing of force of law on anyone other than those employed by the Executive Branch of the federal government anyway.
Like I said, I have been researching and learning about this since 1991. I feel I am familiar with the laws and the intent of those who established this Republic. I also know that they were human, and imperfect, just like the rest of us. They were not always right, nor did they always agree on things when working to establish the "Great Experiment" of our Constitutional Republic.
Your understanding of the founders and the establishment of our Constitutional Republic is very different from my own. I am not looking through "rose colored glasses", I am leaning on my understanding based upon my own extensive research and study.
I view the Constitution as genius, and the men who founded our Republic as enlightened in the subject of government and individual sovereignty that allowed them to establish something incredible.
Where we are today is the result of evil minded people who either ignored, or twisted, the plain meaning of the Constitution to pervert our government away from the limits of power it should be operating within. So, yes, I acknowledge that there are a lot of things that need to be fixed, but it is not a result of nefarious intentions of our founders. It is 100% due to the intentional undermining of the Constitution and founding principles by people determined to rule rather than serve.
What I see to be true is not based out of a need for it to be true, but because it is true. It is clear you and I will not agree on this subject. That is fine, that is what individual liberty is all about.
HOA fee's are not a tax. It is a voluntary contractual obligation people enter into when buying real estate that includes an HOA. If you do not want to be in an HOA then don't buy in an HOA subdivision.
It seems you are not as familiar with the words and actual beliefs of those that sacrificed to establish our Constitutional Republic. I will let their plain words speak for themselves. You can try to twist their meaning all you want, but that is exactly what the usurpers have done over the decades to erode our liberty to what we have today.
The fact is, in a free society, individuals have the right to do right or wrong, as long as they don’t threaten or infringe upon the rights or property of others. This is exactly what our founders intended by establishing our Republic.
“Republicanism is not the phantom of a deluded imagination. On the contrary, laws, under no form of government, are better supported, liberty and property better secured, or happiness more effectually dispensed to mankind.” ~ George Washington (1732-1799) Founding Father, 1st US President, 'Father of the Country'
“On every question of construction [of the Constitution] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or intended against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President to Justice William Johnson, 1823, The Complete Jefferson, p. 322
“The constitutions of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed; that they are entitled to freedom of person, freedom of religion, freedom of property and freedom of the press.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President
“The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the law of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.” ~ John Adams (1735-1826) Founding Father, 2nd US President Defence of the Constitutions of the Government of the United States
“In short, it is the greatest Absurdity to suppose it in the Power of one or any Number of Men, at the entering into Society, to renounce their essential natural Rights or the Means of preserving those Rights, when the grand End of civil Government, from the very Nature of its Institution, is for the Support, Protection and Defense of those very Rights: The principal of which, as is before observed, are Life, Liberty, and Property.” ~ Samuel Adams (1722-1803), was known as the "Father of the American Revolution." The Votes and Proceedings of the Freeholders and Other Inhabitants of the Town of Boston in Town Meeting Assembled, According to Law. Published by Order of the Town. Nov 20 1772
“Among the natural Rights of the Colonists are these: First, a Right to Life; secondly, to Liberty; thirdly, to Property; together with the Right to support and defend them in the best Manner they can. Those are evident Branches of, rather than Deductions from, the Duty of Self-Preservation, commonly called the first Law of Nature.” ~ Samuel Adams (1722-1803), was known as the "Father of the American Revolution." The Votes and Proceedings of the Freeholders and Other Inhabitants of the Town of Boston in Town Meeting Assembled, According to Law. Published by Order of the Town. Oct 1772
“Government is instituted to protect property of every sort. ... This being the end of government, that alone is a just government, which impartially secures to every man, whatever is his own.” ~ James Madison (1751-1836), Father of the Constitution for the USA, 4th US President Essay entitled Property, published March 27, 1792 in the NATIONAL GAZETTE, and reprinted in THE PAPERS OF JAMES MADISON, Vol. 14, p. 266 (University of Virginia Press 1982).
“All men are created equally free and independent, and have certain inherent rights, of which they cannot, by any compact, deprive or divest their posterity; among which are the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing the obtaining of happiness and safety.” ~ George Mason (1725-1792), drafted the Virgina Declaration of Rights, ally of James Madison and George Washington First Draft, Virginia Declaration of Rights
“While the people have property, arms in their hands, and only a spark of noble spirit, the most corrupt Congress must be mad to form any project of tyranny.” ~ Rev. Nicholas Collin (1746-1831) Episcopal pastor, friend of Benjamin Franklin Fayetteville Gazette (N.C.), October 12, 1789
“The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.” ~ Justice Robert H. Jackson (1892-1954), U. S. Supreme Court Justice West Virginia Board of Education vs. Barnette, 1943
“It is embarrassing to have to remind people of this in the United States of America. In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson singled out three natural rights: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The last phrase, appearing instead of "property," has prompted much discussion. I cannot say what Jefferson was thinking. But here's a plausible theory: Property is already implicit in liberty. If you are free, you can use your belongings as you see fit. But by specifying the pursuit of happiness Jefferson might have been pointing out that the blessing of liberty need not be justified through selfless service to others. One's life and happiness on earth are justification enough.” ~ Sheldon Richman Editor of The Freeman, author, journalist
“[F]or everybody has a natural right to defend his own person and property against aggressors, but also to go to the assistance and defence of everybody else, whose person or property is invaded. The natural right of each individual to defend his own person and property against an aggressor, and to go to the assistance and defence of every one else whose person or property is invaded, is a right without which men could not exist on earth.” ~ Lysander Spooner (1808-1887) Political theorist, activist, abolitionist Vices are Not Crimes, A Vindication of Moral Liberty (1875)
“The dichotomy between personal liberties and property rights is a false one. Property does not have rights. People have rights... . In fact, a fundamental interdependence exists between the personal right to liberty and the personal right in property.” ~ Justice Potter Stewart (1915-1985) Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States Lynch v. Household Finance Corp., 1972
“The right to enjoy property without unlawful deprivation, no less that the right to speak out or the right to travel is, in truth, a “personal” right.” ~ Justice Potter Stewart (1915-1985) Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States Lynch v. Household Finance Corporation, 1972
I espouse the Constitution, as originally signed by the founders. I have been studying the establishment of our Republic since 1991 when I served in the Gulf War. I was disillusioned by the lies I was told and had my eye opening moment that led me to want to better understand what I took an oath to defend.
I have spent many hours researching the true history and read many private correspondence of many of the founders, ready original law books of their era, and was very impressed with the original intent of our federal government.
Some of what you allude to is true, but taken out of context. Regardless, I believe in the founding principles of our Constitutional Republic, and have my own research and understanding to support my faith in the great experiment.
For anyone interested in researching for yourself, here is a good place to start; https://teamlaw.net/Mythology-CorpUS.htm
I recommend doing your own independent research of what you find to verify and confirm for yourself.
Actually, one of the founding principles upon which our Republic was established is the right to own property. A recurring tax makes that impossible. Government has no authority to levy a recurring property tax. Remember, government was instituted to protect our individual rights and serve us, not tax us to death and rule over us.
Recurring property taxes are responsible for more people losing their homes than you probably realize. It also makes owning a home impossible since there will always be a payment, even when the mortgage is paid in full. Many people can afford to pay when they are younger, healthy, and employed, but older people who are on fixed incomes often cannot.
I have served in combat, and i have also lost friends and loved ones in the service of their country. I love our country a great deal, but I also support the rights of those I do not agree with. Burning a flag does me no harm, nor anyone else. As repugnant of an act it may be, harmful it is not.
“The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts as are only injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods, or no God. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President
“If there be any among us who would wish to dissolve this Union or to change its republican form, let them stand undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President
“No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another, and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President
“Laws provide against injury from others; but not from ourselves.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President
“The error seems not sufficiently eradicated, that the operations of the mind, as well as the acts of the body, are subject to the coercion of the laws. But our rulers can have authority over such natural rights only as we have submitted to them. The rights of conscience we never submitted, we could not submit. We are answerable for them to our God. The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. ... Was the government to prescribe to us our medicine and diet, our bodies would be in such keeping as our souls are now. Thus in France the emetic was once forbidden as a medicine, and the potatoe as an article of food.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President
“Our legislators are not sufficiently appraised of the rightful limits of their power; that their true office is to declare and enforce our natural rights and duties, and to take none of them from us. No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another; and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him; every man is under the natural duty of contributing to the necessities of the society; and this is all the laws should enforce on him; and, no man having the right to be the judge between himself and another, it is his natural duty to submit to the umpirage of an impartial third [party]. When the laws have declared and enforced all this, they have fulfilled their functions; and the idea is quite unfounded, that on entering into society we give up any natural right.” ~ Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President letter to Francis W. Gilmer, June 7, 1816
That's another matter entirely.
Sometimes, the most powerful speech can involve no words at all.
The catch-22 regarding freedom of speech in the United States is that it protects malicious hateful speech just as much as it protects positive or acceptable speech.
Well, you do not have a right to damage or destroy the property of others. That violates their rights. So that is already illegal, and there are existing laws in most jurisdictions to cover that.
These days, it is very easy to set up a failure with SS, or any other agency. Every SS agent has a specific role, and I am sure they concentrate on that role, exclusively. If so, it would not be hard for someone higher up to set up points of failure to result in a successful assassination under the SS watch.
Back when I was part of the protection of the V-Corps Commander in the Army, we all knew not only our jobs, but the other jobs, as well. That way we could quickly adapt to any unexpected variables that came up in an operation. I do not think that is the case today with the SS, or many other similar agencies.
If true, then it would be easy to build in gaps in the security plan exploiting that lack of coordination.
There could also be a few people sprinkled into the overall operation that were in on the plan to allow DJT to be assassinated. This could explain the delays in responding when shots were fired.
The guards, the warden, the administrative staff, and every single democrat and RINO that orchestrated and persecuted the J6 hostages need to be prosecuted and be subject to capital punishment for the crimes they committed.
Agencies that were never authorized to begin with should be under POTUS's purview to shut them down. At the very least, he can issue an executive order to the effect that everyone in those agencies are prohibited from activities POTUS chooses to outline.
Trust in God and keep your powder dry.
The Biden's, The Obama's, the Clinton's, The Bush's, not any of them have been held accountable for their crimes against our Republic. I hope and pray they do here on Earth, but know that they all will face justice in the highest of Courts when that final judgement comes to us all in the end.
Martial Arts? Very few departments train in martial arts. There is usually some basic hand-2-hand training (different holds and restraining moves) in the academy, but it isn't like LEO's are trained for serious hand-2-hand combat.
Blatant money laundering through ACT Blue and an illegal sweep of Biden's ill-gotten "war chest" from Biden's campaign to the illegitimate VP's.
The FEC mentioned it, but the Democrats are trying to silence any dissent.
H 4885 includes, but is not limited to:
A complete semi-automatic firearm and “high-capacity” magazine ban with a grandfathering date of August 1, 2024. - There is no legitimate power granted to our servant government to do this. Most importantly, one of the founding tenants of our federal government is to protect our individual rights from being infringed or trampled.
Tougher penalties on homemade firearms — all frames and receivers are expected to be serialized. - There is no legitimate power granted to our servant government to do this. Most importantly, one of the founding tenants of our federal government is to protect our individual rights from being infringed or trampled.
Expansion of Red Flag laws. - There is no legitimate power granted to our servant government to do this.
Stricter testing/licensing standards, which creates a new training curriculum that includes injury prevention, suicide prevention, disengagement tactics, live fire training, and completion of a written exam. - Direct violation of the 2nd Amendment.
An outright ban on “undetectable firearms.” - Direct violation of the 2nd Amendment.
Allowing the Department of Criminal Justice access to firearm owners personal data by making changes to information protection law. -Direct violation of the 2nd Amendment, the 4th Amendment, and the foundational principles upon which our Republic was established.
Bans the usage of 3-D printers and CNC milling machines to manufacture or assemble any firearm without a license to carry firearms. - Direct violation of the 2nd Amendment.
Bans the sale of 3-D printers and CNC milling machines that have the “primary or intended function of manufacturing or assembling firearms.” - Direct violation of the Constitution.
New permitting laws for pepper spray. - Direct violation of the Constitution.
Expansion of the current Firearm Control Advisory Board. - Direct violation of the Constitution.
Bingo. You cannot impeach an illegitimate office holder.
if true, every single SS agent that obeyed that unlawful order is subject to prosecution. They took an oath, and knew what their mission was. There is no excuse for following an unlawful order.
Unless you have your Land patent updated. You can learn more about them here: https://teamlaw.net/land.htm