https://rumble.com/v21lwrq-the-fight-for-arizona-election-trial-lake-v.-hobbs-day-1-12212022.html
https://rumble.com/v21r7f2-the-fight-for-arizona-election-trial-lake-v.-hobbs-day-2-12212022.html
Apparently you did not watch the 2 day trial. You have quite a few hours of viewing ahead of you.
Which US attorney’s office is doing this? You’re not gonna have a rico trial in multi district…you gotta pick one district. You gotta get a grand jury indictment in the district in which the crime occurred. That may include more than one district but you’re not having more than one trial.
SCOTUS would love sorting out the 6th amendment issue here about the district in which the crime occurred. There have been some cases with interstate drug transportation that brought defendants to trial in districts in which they had never been physically present. While questionably good decisions by the Court, they have very little factually in common with this type of case. And almost always the DOJ was forum shopping.
We don’t need no stinking badges
Or just die “suddenly”
Goddamn it. Maybe I will change my mind and go back to watch the remaining 16 minutes…but this guy starts off completely off base.
-
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act has no bearing on Covid EUA jabs. None. “But muh vote to include in the table…” Hasn’t been added to the table; not adding the EUA version to the table but the unable to ever been found Comirnaty version. Secretary of HHS has about 18 months from that vote to finalize the rule including it in the table.
-
There is no “felony negates the EUA” nonsense. If you read the law, it exempts the manufacturer and those normally involved in the dispensing of said jab. That would mean places like Walgreens, doctors, and others. But, that liability waiver does not cover “acts of willful misconduct.” Of which, project veritas has brought us willful misconduct in the concealment of fetal stem cells as an ingredient in the jab. We also have what could possibly be considered willful misconduct with Pfizer CEO not correcting the record publicly about never testing to prevent transmission. There are a few other incidences that I am failing to remember as well.
Bottom line: trial lawyers will eventually eat these people alive. That’s what they do. There is too much money here for the trial lawyers to sit back and ignore this. My personal thoughts are that with the right plaintiff and the Veritas stem cell videos, you’d likely survive a motion to dismiss and get into discovery. I don’t think you’d win the case on the Veritas recordings alone. But you would likely get a lot of stuff in discovery that would assist different plaintiffs in piercing the liability shield. It will be a multi step process, and it will take a deep pockets large firm or a collaboration between several large firms to do this. And they will. They are damn good at this sort of thing.
He’s got 2 problems: (1) standing and (2) availability of a statutory remedy. AZ law grants “interested beneficial parties” the ability to petition for mandamus. It would appear that an eligible elector “could” be construed as an interested beneficial party. But that is not a given; and runs into the issue of “concrete and particularized” injury required to have standing to bring suit. There is also a “quo warranto” statute. He can petition the AZ attorney general to initiate removal proceedings for a party unlawfully holding AZ office. That the AG was also fraudulently elected and unlikely to pursue the case is no basis to petition the court for this alternative mandamus against the trial court judge in Lake’s case. You can petition for quo warranto mandamus to compel the AG to bring the case.
I have seen this. Very coincidental and convenient. But given the testimony in the initial hearing, how does that work? They are on the record with saying that the wrong size won’t scan at all. It gets rejected. Then taken elsewhere and we never truly know with any certainty of what happens. Could be (1) adjudication; (2) duplication; or (3) thrown away. Nobody knows except Katie Hobbs.
I’m just not following. You can buy rubles now. The exchange rate depends on your currency you seek to trade for rubles. Whether that is dollars, pesos, euros, shekels…whatever.
Russia might have accepted US dollars for rubles. And they probably still do. But when you are sanctioned by the west and forced out of the swift system, that becomes a problem. Hence, they forced the euros to pay them in rubles for natural gas.
The main problem with foreign currencies flowing into your country is that you need enough trade with that country that their currency is useable by your people. The US gets away with its fiscal policies because the rest of the world is content to own things in America with the dollars they receive from trading. I’m not sure anyone wants to buy a lot of Russian stuff. So I’ve heard a lot of physical gold is being sent to trade for rubles instead.
So if you wouldn’t mind, please enlighten me here. I am not getting it. How does creating a fiat exchange rate = a partnership with that country? Just not getting there with this single fact.
Dream big, settle for baby steps. The debt ceiling is an opportunity to force dems to vote to stop this new ATF overreach.
We should be thankful that these guys use glock switches. Think of the death toll in south Chicago if these were to go away and the shooters could actually hit the broad side of a barn and not run out of ammo in 1.4 seconds.
Like Obamacare repeal?
Save your breath. This is another example of an issue we ought to be on offense with. What you just said isn’t wrong. It is just unnecessary. You shouldn’t even need to get to that point till these fools promoting this answer a single question: What reason is there to regulate short barrel rifles/shotguns differently than non sbr/sbs?
Originally, when the NFA was first passed, the main reason argued for the sbr/sbs rules were because of “concealability” of such weapons. A guy walking down the street might have one under his coat and catch everyone by surprise when he pulls out some heavy duty firepower like the gangsters in NYC, Philly, and Chicago used to do.
Not to say that I am ok with the contemporary arguments at the time of passage. Far from it. But for these purposes, just accept that argument. Fast forward 80 years. I can conceal a glock 17 with a 33 round mag under my coat lawfully in all but full Bolshevik states. Tell me how totally unsafe society is if someone can shave 4 inches off their M4/AR15 barrel and suddenly the public is totally fucked? “My God if this maniac had a 16” barrel instead of 12” all these people would still be alive!” Said nobody ever.
The next question I have for these clowns after answering the last one: What is so different about SBR/SBS that requires separate and overly burdensome applications to be filled out, along with finger prints etc, and an epic year long wait for these guys to stop shooting unarmed women/children and their dogs long enough to process these applications? If an FFL can sell me a 50 cal Barrett, AR10 .308, AK47, glock, sig, s&W etc without having to go through all of the bullshit for SBR/SBS, why do we need this system? What function does it serve other than arbitrary inconvenience?
You know what is a better argument for the handicapped than a stupid brace? The fact that without shorter barrels, they cannot reasonably and effectively use a rifle.
So I am not the only one this has happened to? Phew. That is a relief. I was beginning to think that maybe I should stop boating since clearly my boat captain safety record is abysmal.
Why does this mean that NZ has joined up with Russia?
Admittedly I’m not the most knowledgeable finance or forex person, so I might be missing something here. I’ve not known currency exchange rates to be made by government fiat. But since Russia is forcing everyone to pay them in rubles for energy, I would presume that they are setting exchange rates to max out their return on the exchange. It would seem such a program would incentivize these countries not to support acts by the west that would weaken the ruble. Because it would only screw them over on their costs of energy.
Good thing for Xe/Xer same sex marriage is legal there
He didn’t say that. Kari Lake told us he said that. We don’t know if he actually did or if that was planted for other purposes.
He’s right, the timing is way off. I thought he has said several times that he intends to run anyway. As in before this story ever broke he had said as much. Absent some other factor we are completely unaware of, why would you burn your indictment card of Trump by smearing this dude with the same shit solely because you didn’t want a formal announcement from him? That seems like a helluva steep price to pay.
You’d think a hunter indictment looming would be enough leverage over the guy. And numerous other “wtf is this” stuff he’s done ought to be sufficient to handle matters like these behind closed doors. The other more believable story? Just hide the guy for 10 days, be very vague for the first 5, and then start planting rumors of a health issue followed by collective media propaganda on how “it just might be in everyone’s best interest if he just don’t run again….” Then you don’t have a lot of work to sell this to the public - everyone already knows he’s demented. And you don’t have to burn your indictment card.
The only other scenario that is possible (but I don’t find it plausible) would be that they are attempting to burn both Trump & Biden by charging them both with the docs bs. Not only would this be a whole new low for Wile E. Coyote type of plans, but even they couldn’t possibly be convinced this will work. The best “evidence” to support this would be the 2020 election. NeverTrumpism was at its peak in 2020. People also were led to believe that the Covid situation we all were living with masks and shut downs and schools closured etc was due to Trump’s mismanagement of the situation. 2020 was the absolute pinnacle of possible legit Biden voter turnout. I’d still be shocked if he won over 50 million votes. But look how hard it was for them to cheat in 2020. It might not actually be physically possible to rig 2024 with Biden as the alternative to Trump. Now people know that was bs, that Biden is retarded and everything is worse than during peak Covid in 2020. Can Biden even break 25 million votes in 2024? And if not, where are they going to get an extra 20-25 mil beyond what they fabricated in 2020?
I don’t think that getting trained is the same thing as running trains. Err…uh…so I’ve heard…
Everyone knows it was Sam Hyde. Working for that damn Ronald Drumpf. Can’t believe these threats to Our Democracy™ are still walking around free…
No. Grand Juries don’t acquit anyone. They can make a finding of probable cause and return what is called a “true bill” or they can return “no bill” which is not an acquittal but a finding that the prosecutor hasn;’t provided enough evidence to reach probable cause. Double jeopardy only applies to petit juries. You go to trial on the charge and get acquitted by a petit jury, then double jeopardy kicks in.
The last shot was certainly iffy. But we don’t view this stuff in a vacuum with the benefit of hindsight and being able to watch the video over and over. This transpired over what…8 seconds?
2 part test: (a) did the shooter feel in imminent fear of death or serious bodily harm? (b) was the amount of force used “reasonable?”
The state has to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. That means both elements. No question (a) is fine. It was a robbery. In (b) the use of force was perfectly reasonable until the last shot. Then it becomes sorta a grey area. You can’t really push that over the “beyond a reasonable doubt” line. Not in these circumstances and on this timeline. If he went back 30 seconds later and did it, different story. Here, while rather poor judgement, it would not reach the threshold required.
Because no state has a statute of limitations on murder. So regardless, the guy could face charges 25 years from now if he’s still here and their DA office gets even worse than now.
Yes. Beyond retarded. Corrupt AND retarded.
It should be a lot of fun running political ads with these asinine statements. Even NPCs could understand how dumb this is. Imagine an ad where on one side, it shows the rule actually allowing amendments to bills next to this ass hat on the other side talking about how this is extremist. That would be fun.
You mean the dems are getting the same treatment the reps got from Pelosi??
It is actually a problem. No court is going to allow 2020 evidence into court in a case about the 2022 election. None of the 2020 problems (of which there are a lot) can be used as a basis to claim they happened in 2022.
The main problem with her case is the statutory framework for challenging elections. The time line is absurdly short; and all the damning evidence in possession of the defendant with no time to compel its production. The process for challenging rigged elections is itself rigged.