Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

335
AZ: Today’s Senate Testimony CONFIRMS nearly 40,000 ballots illegally counted (10% of the signatures reviewed). (twitter.com)
posted 3 years ago by Bia2020 3 years ago by Bia2020 +335 / -0
27 comments share
27 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (27)
sorted by:
▲ 19 ▼
– xchainlinkx 19 points 3 years ago +19 / -0

Great. How much more evidence do we need to end this fraudulent government?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Knew2u 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

^^ Exactly this! AZ/Lake has already provided a boatload of evidence, and this just adds to it. So when does something happen??? They can present all the irrefutable evidence to the judge, but the system is rigged. I hope she keeps up the fight but SOMEONE in power has to listen and affect change

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Dontstopbelieving 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

I'm starting to think that maybe it is plausible that some shenanigans may have occurred but I'd like to see more evidence.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– AllowMeToExplain 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

https://rumble.com/v21lwrq-the-fight-for-arizona-election-trial-lake-v.-hobbs-day-1-12212022.html

https://rumble.com/v21r7f2-the-fight-for-arizona-election-trial-lake-v.-hobbs-day-2-12212022.html

Apparently you did not watch the 2 day trial. You have quite a few hours of viewing ahead of you.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MAGAdeburger 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Never never.... Never never.... Never never

https://youtu.be/6jZVsr7q-tE

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– placekicker17 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

“This is compelling evidence, Ms Lake. However, the election was certified, all counties agreeing. I have no power to undo a certified election.”- the Judge, most likely.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– TheRealMikeFlynn 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

No judge is like you’re an idiot with no standing. Get the ruck out of my court! What a jerk the judge is!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– coomer 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

No standing etc etc, not dooming but we’ve already been through this with the exact same people running the clown show.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– SJBHamilton 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Kari Lake is Joan d'Arc reincarnated. Totally beyond amazing.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– sunnyinvegas 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Not sure why these ballots are from the 2020 election?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SocratesKnowsNothing 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

when comparing current election signatures you compare to most recent previous election's (such as 2020) signature. if you read twatter comments the libtards claim with the confidence of a true idiot how dumb Kari is for showing 2020 signatures not realizing they're the ignorant morons

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AllowMeToExplain 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

It is actually a problem. No court is going to allow 2020 evidence into court in a case about the 2022 election. None of the 2020 problems (of which there are a lot) can be used as a basis to claim they happened in 2022.

The main problem with her case is the statutory framework for challenging elections. The time line is absurdly short; and all the damning evidence in possession of the defendant with no time to compel its production. The process for challenging rigged elections is itself rigged.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SocratesKnowsNothing 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

what?!? you dont know what you speak of wrt to 2020. this isn't about challenging the 2020 election and that's not what she's doing. and signatures from 2020 or 2016 or whenever CAN be used for verifying a 2022 signature

as for her ability to challenge 2022, she has done that in TIMELY manner and she has appealed in a timely manner so there's that. whether corrupted courts will listen and give fair shake is completely different and there you might prove to be right imho

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– AllowMeToExplain 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Using 2020 signatures to verify 2022 is one thing, but I am pretty sure these are not 2022 ballots. I would be floored if anyone except Katie Hobbs has the ballot envelope images from 2022. My comment is with that assumption. So, with that in mind, I stand by what I said. No matter how fucked up the 2020 signatures were, that isn’t going to be admissible to prove 2022 was as fucked up or worse. Can they take those sigs and compare them to 2022? Sure. But I don’t think anyone is doing that. It took the AZ Senate like a year to extract those envelopes to give to Dr. Shiva. No way they have the 2022 ones already.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SocratesKnowsNothing 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

fair point/argument and I've not traveled far enough down this rabbit hole to speak intelligently about if they have access, or could reasonably have access, to 2022 signatures

hopefully something good is on the horizon one way or the other

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Memesicus 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Is the one on the right not 2022 and the left 2020? They're definitely comparisons of the same name.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AllowMeToExplain 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Looks like the ballot envelope compared to registration card. One is for sure the envelope but the other looks to not be a ballot or envelope.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Memesicus 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

But there is no yr is the thing. Likely from two different yrs, at least. If they were gonna cheat, wouldn't it have been easier if they sign both.

Maybe you're right but I scarcely believe that the img she bothered sending would have been that of 2020. That's too much of an oversight.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 2 ▼
– LateToTheShow 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Hey! My eyes are still on the AZ audit…..

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– dontdrinksoy 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Well, fuck... What happens now?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– miketrrapcom1 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

This will be slow walked through the courts forever and we know it and we will let it happen.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Honor+Duty 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

The ballots on the left all look like the same person wrote the signature.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SocratesKnowsNothing 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

this is just some image. wish Kari could provide better sauce but maybe that's what's to drop on 29th

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 8 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - pv4fp (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy