I think it's pretty apparent why that's the case.
Gun control is a slow, incremental process, and they're out of time. They want full blown civil unrest and violent conflicts to take one last stab at remaining in power.
The only thing standing in the way of that, right now, is that Trump is still alive. He was supposed to die, and SS was supposed to let it happen.
Men make plans and God laughs.
Kind of odd, considering it was his own VP trying to off him. 🤷‍♂️
Who can say for sure? Hopefully it doesn't come to that, but if it does, like any other time in our grand cyclical history, it's only temporary.
Kings, presidents, countries, and war are only games for those of the world.
For the rest, it's a matter of intellectual curiosity that, ultimately, makes little difference in the grand scheme of things.
The only problem is that trump wasn't shot in an extremity. He turned his head right before the first shot, which was less than an inch away from ending him. Had he not turned his head, he would be dead.
I do not believe the intention was to execute a failed assassination attempt. A legitimate attempt was made on him (likely not the first time). But I also don't believe that this was just Crooks acting on his own. SS failed miserably, there were early reports of two shooters, and there is an active search engine scrubbing going on of an antifa trouble-maker pointed out on /pol/ who looks an awful lot like the deceased shooter.
Obviously the goal is to bait both sides into violence so the election can be avoided. Perhaps it was also to setup Joe and force him out, not only because they want him out, but also to appear to hold their own to the same bogus standard they tried to hold Trump to for J6.
Stay frosty.
Don't forget that the media calls everything an AR-15. Even shootings that were done with handguns are always initially reported as AR-15s. It's bigger and scarier!
We'll probably never get any real details about the shooting, shooter(s?), or how SS clearly allowed it to happen. But we already know why it happened.
I was following some of the pol threads and am inclined to agree that Yearick seems much more likely. Especially given that all of the google results have been scrubbed for his name in the last few hours.
The only thing that doesn't add up is the picture from the unknown source that shows him alive, in the same shirt. That picture is CLEARLY Crooks and not Yearick.
I'm also not sure what to make of the IG post from a couple hours ago from a guy who looks kind of like Crooks saying "you have the wrong guy" that has also since been wiped.
There were also a lot of initial reports of two shooters, so... who really knows.
What we do know is that it was either orchestrated by the deep state, or incited by the deep state, with obvious negligence (at best) by the SS.
They want him dead -- the question is: did they also want to take Biden out at the same time?
Capitalism is simply an economic system that requires all parties engaged in trade to consent to the transaction. If there is no consent, it is without exception, not capitalism, but theft. This, of course, includes taxation.
Crony capitalism is a capitalist economy corrupted by government that has acquired the power to interfere with fair trade, and so either blatantly manipulates the market for direct profit, or officials are bribed by corporations who want to use legislation and regulation to give themselves an unfair advantage.
The reason capitalism always turns into crony capitalism is because government is not kept in check. If officials have no power to manipulate the free market, there can be no 'crony' capitalism -- which by the way -- is just Socialism.
Well, I don't disagree, but all the attacks also help the narrative for when they do blatantly cheat, that people didn't want Trump because he's constantly accused of bad things.
It's basically win/win for them -- at least until justice comes for them (in one way or another).
This will ever be the case on Earth, and why Individualism (i.e., pursuit of growth and evolution at an individual level, by protecting the individual's right to always act according his or her conscience) is the moral and only rational approach.
We can only raise humanity by influencing VOLUNTARY action through leading by example.
Be a Light.
Gotcha. And no worries, that's why we have discussions.
Though, I do think there are many (even perhaps most) who attend these things and believe in a "good WEF" who are simply ignorant and have been fooled into their agenda of collectivism.
There is Truth in ALL THINGS, and what many see in the WEF (et al) is the Truth that Unity is Good. What they don't see is that true collectivism can never be had on Earth, as no two humans are perfectly attuned, much less entire populations -- and trying to force it on anyone is immensely evil.
Instead, as individuals who seek true Collectivism, we ought to VOLUNTARILY turn our thoughts to and attune with the Divine, for union with God / Absolute Goodness is the only way individuals can ever hope to truly connect through a common thread. Those who are able to do this are the real "enlightened."
Did you watch Milei's speech? It's absolutely incredible.
One of the best things I have ever witnessed in the world of politics.
Hating people is never righteous.
Hate evil actions, behavior and influences.
Better yet, love the person into submission of that Divine Power.
It is ignorance that is the root of ALL sin, and NONE of us are without it.
Maybe actually listen to the speech?
He literally went there just to give them all the middle finger and say the WEF is complete garbage.
You mean like... when he also spoke at Davos?
He specifically said that socialism not only is NOT a solution to human problems, but the CAUSE of them.
He also went further to fully define what socialism actually means in today's world, which is more subversive than traditional socialism.
I cannot understate how much I like this guy.
This is the energy we need!
Many states have both. I'm actually surprised it's not all states.
Those that do both typically have some state law about the elected delegates at the caucus being bound to vote for the candidate who received xx% majority vote in the primary, but can break that vote if that majority is not met, or if there is a recast at the convention because there was no clear victory. (Some states do not require delegates to pledge their votes).
In 2012, Ron Paul actually had a better chance at the nomination than most realize because Paul supporters dominated the caucuses even in states where Romney was the clear victor in the primary. If there was a recast at the convention that year for any reason, I'm fairly certain Ron Paul would have won the nomination in a massive upset.
I suspect DeSantis supports may try the same tactic, so be sure to attend your local caucuses!
Thanks for the kind words.
But to be fair, my "kin" are just dark/olive-skinned, white Europeans who adopted the Hebrew scriptures (which was a hodgepodge of genuine Wisdom, Semitic superstition, and somewhat-ignorant adaptations of true Egyptian mythology, later revitalized and corrected by the authors of the New Testament) for themselves. Not that it's really any more artificial than any other ethnic construct.
All of that to say modern day Jews are not Semites, nor are they "Israelites" and had Hitler bothered to read Blavatsky's books that were purported to sit on his desk, he might have quickly realized that his entire conception of racial superiority was severely flawed. Moreover, perhaps he wouldn't have gotten so far off track from his original goal of destroying the socialist state, instead of just becoming it.
However, it's still pretty apparent to anyone that investigates primary sources for history that Hitler's goal was never to (nor did he provide any orders to) indiscriminately kill Jews. Jews were targeted because they tended (and still do for some reason, unbeknownst to my family and other conservative Jewish friends/family) to be aligned with Communism, similarly to the US declaring all ethnically Japanese as potential enemies during WWII. The real, inexcusable crime of the Third Reich was the socialist eugenics movement that lead to the cruel experiments, torture and killing of PRISONERS, who were basically anyone who wasn't an "ethnic German" or a German ally, which were a lot more than just Jews. Coincidentally, this movement was carried over into Planned Parenthood in the US and bled into the "depopulation" agenda, which is just a cover for trying to artificially advance human evolution.
Unfortunately for all of these numpty billionaires, politicians and 'world leaders' that think this is a possibility, they have yet to learn that the races of Man are not material, but SPIRITUAL, and no amount of needles, pills or selective breeding will ever move humanity forward one iota.
You know what will? Individuals turning back towards God/Nature, glorifying the essential Goodness in everything, and once again listening the messages of their own soul/conscience. The REAL Great Awakening.
/rant
YUP. I'm Jewish, and I'd still pick Hitler over the other three.
Call me an optimist if you like, but if what you're telling me is that nearly one third of Democrats and one half of Independents are no longer buying the narrative, this is great news.
Certainly closer than reading Exodus like a history book.
This is true.
Well, the Press Secretary is. Joe probably hasn't yet gotten out of bed.
Absolutely. It's important that Truth and Goodness is praised wherever it is found, and the opposite is called out, wherever it is found.
There is a disheartening trend by "conservative influencers" to ridicule those from the opposite political aisle either because of their history, some presumed ulterior motive, or whataboutism, even when what they say is correct.
It bothers me that so many conservatives idolize people like Dan Bongino who spews contempt and hatred towards those he disagrees with.
Fauci is guilty of some deeply evil acts against humanity, but if he gets on camera and says something true (hypothetically), I will agree with it. Not because I think he's turned over a new leaf, but because it's not an impossibility, and more importantly, it works to create a bridge to the ignorant that like such figures.
Finding common ground gets harder and harder with each generation of Marxists and their ignorant followers, but it is possible. And when you get to those common underlying beliefs that almost everyone shares you can have a real relationship and conversations that may lead the person away from their wrong beliefs, or even you away from yours.
You will often find that the vast majority of people with completely differing ideologies have disagreements rooted in understandings of words, not ideas.
To use one trending example:
"Black lives matter" to liberals means that we need to focus on injustice against Black people, and that all lives don't matter if Black lives don't matter, because they've been mislead to believe there is a disproportionate amount of violence against Black people.
Consequently, while conservatives proclaim in response "all lives matter" because they do, liberals turn in disgust from the slogan -- not because they don't believe that all lives matter -- but because they view it as a response created specifically to undermine the movement that calls attention to the great injustice taking place against Black people.
Most will refuse evidence that counters what they "feel" and will ignore the statistics that show that, in general, there is no systemic oppression of Black people based on their race. But many will and have see the truth and turn their energy towards the real oppressors.
There is a lot of bait being thrown in the waters to further divide people, especially as the government NEEDS to create the "threat of white nationalism."
DO NOT TAKE THE BAIT
There is of course a disproportionate rate of violent behavior from Black people, but that is a matter of evolution compounded by the fact that Democrats that have continued to oppress and segregate them for centuries. Government handouts create entitlement. The music industry props up thug idols for boys and whore idols for girls, creating generations of thugs and whores. But this is not a necessary fate, and many have and continue to pull themselves out of this "ghetto mire."
Even if you believe that your "race" somehow has some superiority over others, all that should mean is that you've been equipped to better SERVE those who are straggling behind. As the Master Jesus washed the feet of the sinners who shared dinner with him, so you who knows better ought to do everything in your power to lovingly help your fellow man, White, Black, or of any other disposition, to evolve.
Again, Trump turned his head just before the shot that grazed him. Had he not, he'd have been dead. I don't think this was a failure of the shooter, but a success of a higher power.
To call this staged seems extraordinarily far-fetched. Set up: certainly; inside job: probably. But we all knew it was only a matter of time before someone tried to (publicly) assassinate him, whether orchestrated by the deep state, or just tilted, mentally-ill, lone actors.
What convinces me that Trump was actually shot (as opposed to staging some sort of special effect) is his reaction. An actor knows the event is coming, and would have reacted to the shot instantly. Trump, instead, took a couple seconds to realize what had just happened before dropping to the ground. So either he's a better actor than anyone on the planet (which his appearance on Fresh Prince would contradict), or he was actually shot in the ear. And if he was actually shot in the ear, there's no way in hell he'd be in on a stunt that puts a bullet less than an inch from his brain. It would defy all logic.