That's why the bears are more productive than the kangs
Its the one thing criminals still hold values for... don't mess with the kids. They will most likely rape and kill these two in jail. But we all know there will be some super protective custody for them where they can just be gay together alone on the tax payers dime.
I'm happy for you that you are clean from the opiates and that you are strong enough to not go back to it. But that door is right next to weed. It will be opened if the weed door is opened. You know first hand I am sure how dangerous that would be.
If you don't mind me asking, why do you smoke after kicking dope? Side note I don't drink either. Not even a drop in over 15 years. I have seen what all this stuff does to people and I will not do it. Working on the processed food part now.
The amount of "dindu's" doing it blatantly out in public and driving has 100% increased since the decriminalization of it in my shit hole state. I see it every day at work.
I mean just read this thread... one dude said he has been smoking it for 30 years and went on a tweaker (ironically liberal like tangent) about it higher up in the thread. Another said they moved to a red state for their kid but also stated they smoked for hours every day even while driving and at work and at home. Does any of that seem reasonable to you? If it does and you choose to open that door, heroin and coke are next. They are part of the "plant" argument most in here are quoting.
There is a reason no smoking inside exists even for cigarettes. Yet the pot heads do it all the time. Had to move my grandmother out of her apartment because the jackass had a medical card and the smoke was literally entering her apartment. Its obnoxious and not needed.
If you are responsible then you would not be the one driving and causing the accident then right?
Clearly you are beyond emotional about weed and that raises some serious questions alone but you do realize people are actually killed over the stuff every day right? They are under the influence behind the wheel of a car and kill people all the time right? You do know that legal and illegal drug shops are robbed and shot up all the time right? This is what I am talking about.
"I’ve been smoking for 30 years so I’ve heard all these lies before. I defy you to show me 1 —just one— person I’ve harmed through my 3 decades of smoking. Spoiler: YOU CAN’T. Because I’ve never injured anyone because of weed."
As clearly stated in my multiple responses in this thread, I stated that there are some who can use it moderately and be fine and not be the problem person. I on the other hand was referring to the nonsense in these shit hole blue cities where there are people everywhere out in public, driving while high, and doing legal/illegal sales while being victims of violence or causing said violence. I have witnessed ALL of this. Since the decriminalization in the city I work, its use and its problems have been amplified.
If you use it responsibly and never were high and decided to drive and hit someone then I'm not talking specifically about YOU. I am talking about the general public. The responsible and those who are not. Like I also stated, I think DUI penalties need to be severely more harsh.
I have seen fatal accidents from both people drunk and high. Again, that doesn't mean YOU. There are more people than YOU. Since you went straight to the extreme of saying I need to show someone YOU hurt instead of a generalized statement about the public, YOU are showing little emotional control.
"Drug-involved crash fatalities now account for approximately 25% of all crash deaths in California, representing 751 fatalities related to drug-involved driving in 2021. People who drive immediately after using marijuana may increase their risk of getting into a crash by 20 to 35 percent." This is from one of the most legalize everything states out there and they are even admitting the increase.
This isnt even accounting for the violence connected to its sale/use.
Again, that does not mean YOU cant be responsible.
Right but how is the shopping network hurting random people in society? Same goes to all the things you listed. Can they be hurtful to people and immediate family? Sure. But the same thing can be said about weed except weed can also hurt random people in the society.
Drugs and Alcohol do. That's why they are regulated. I personally thing the punishment for DUI needs to be so extreme the idea of touching keys NEVER enters anyone's mind. How many lives have been lost or ruined because of alcohol? The same is for weed. For every person it helps (legitimately, not some BS stress relief or something), hundreds are probably hurt. Maybe more. The violence that is around it is astoundingly high and people refuse to look at it.
Legalizing it wont change any of it. People will still sell it. People will still mix it with stuff. People will still drive while high and wreck. There is a reason anything that alters mental or physical state is prohibited while operating vehicles and stuff.
Its not a nanny state when someone can be killed at anytime by someone operating a vehicle high/altered state.
As for you saying "God gave me dominion over all plants bearing seed. I am a free man and not a slave under the whims of a few. The weaknesses of others are not my chains to bear!"
Do you think Heroin and Cocaine should be full legal as well? They both comes from plants with seeds? Should we start smoking poison ivy/sumac as well? Why don't we? Because it give obvious signs of damage to the body.
There are several sections in the Bible that clearly state not to get drunk because it alters the mind. Clearly weed alters the mind.
In regards to it being a plant and that means its ok?
Heroin comes from a plant. Cocaine comes from a plant. Psychedelic Mushrooms are natural, are they ok too? Poison Ivy/Sumac are plants too. Should we smoke those? People avoid it because of the obvious negative effects on the body.
There are so many things made by God but not all are meant to be used to alter mental and physical states of people.
Or some of us are in these blue areas watching clowns do nothing but smoke it all day and commit crimes while under the influence. There is such a twisted layer to society that any drugs only amplify it.
I see this every day. Smoking it around babies, in cars, committing hit and runs. Falling asleep behind the wheel. Robbing and breaking into the cannabis stores that are "legal".
Under moderate use and not the wrong type of person using it, it can be fine and help with medical issue sure. I am not naive to that. But at the same time I am watching the worst of humanity run around all day smoking it everywhere because it was decriminalized. As soon at that happened, problems became worse. Not better.
Just like a good person knows murder and robbery are bad. That person might be able to be "high functioning" but the people who don't.... all weed does is amp it up. I see it every damn day.
Those who say we are stuck in our ways are saying it for a specific reason. Once the genie is out of the bottle there is no putting it back in. Besides specific medical reasons there should be no use of it randomly or wherever you want. Its no different than pain pills being prescribed by a doctor. You don't just willy nilly pop them and give them to kids and stuff. So why is weed different when there are so many examples of it causing harm instead of helping.
The only way to have it work IMO, is to make it exactly like alcohol. 21+, no driving, not in public, etc.... BUT the punishment for breaking it if that goes into effect needs to be so extreme that people don't break the law. Just like DUI and the rest need to be WAYYYYYYY harsher penalties.
Dead... Soulless.... Bug Eyes....
Its both. They were there allegedly serving a warrant. That alone should have had awareness up pretty high and depending on the warrant type, SWAT or at least a team trained with bunkers should have been there. That also being said, with them being apparently more lax in this situation leads me to believe that it was a low level warrant on a farm where they normally don't have problems. Also, the ease at which an ambush can be set up is extremely alarming. Things like this lead to more militarized police which ironically is one of the things protested the loudest.
One report that I was listening to said that the Mexican Consulate was in the loop and those farms were known for illegals working. That combined with them not showing a picture and giving a name of the suspect tells you one thing....
She had a face only for anal back then too
They may have been referring to the part where if you know something is coming that should mean you know who will do it and why were they not stopped and why was security not increased?
Ahhh Smith Mundt.... the anti propaganda act that Obama changed
A sub sonic round is a good point. It would have a lot less muzzle velocity but the impact power would still be very high. Based on the videos I have seen the sound does not sound suppressed to me for being 200 yards away but it is possible that it was. Just very hard to tell without clean audio. Building echos and crowd noises dont make it any easier.
If it was subsonic the penetration would be less true but the impact would still have tremendous force. If he was wearing something extremely advanced from normal applications (Military, Police, Private etc) then none of this analysis means much from anyone to be honest. Its just very rare for someone to wear a plate without supporting torso Kevlar. Something is definitely odd about it.
Well, one an AP 50bmg will 100% pierce an inch and two, I said almost an inch meaning just under. A lvl 4 body armor would be needed to have a good chance to stop it and he was not wearing a lvl 4 plate.
"Some grades of steel, particularly steel used for Armor can stop Armor Piercing bullets from a . 50 BMG with 3 inches of thickness or less. Some steel could possibly be 5 inches thick and a single Armor Piercing round from close range will punch right through it."
An AP 30-06 could penetrate almost an inch thick titanium plate which he clearly was not wearing anything like that.
Also, the .2 inches is the titanium portion. Not the ceramic behind it as well. That is way bulkier than you think and we have not even mentioned the harness required to wear one. I have worn these. You look like a turtle in them.
Will the person who downvoted me come forward and share their experience with wearing body armor?
Simple. He wasn't wearing armor.
He was shot with a 30-06. There is no armor on the planet that could have stopped that and been concealed.
I wear armor. He wasnt wearing armor. If he was, its was to stop maybe a .22. He was shot with a much much larger round.
But but but.... how else can we save the turbotards? Been saying this for 5 years. All this they can be saved if we just keep waiting on the plan they will feel the pain. The pain of what exactly? Being investigation while they keep living in multi million dollar homes for decades? Eating exotic pricy foods? Best clothes? Private Jets? Where is the fucking pain? Where is the results? Rogue judges blocking everything. Psycho liberals killing Christians every damn day. Lives ruined over and over physically and financially. This is a fucking farce at this point.
Cocaine and blue eye Latino boys