1
Bidensbrain2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

The other triangle is red. Perhaps whatever process is used sees red differently, the black stamp would show up fine over red

by Quelle
1
Bidensbrain2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah it has wifi and a cellular modern, but it's AIRGAPPED

2
Bidensbrain2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

They reference ivmmeta which isn't peer reviewed etc. But there are at least 2 other published meta analysis papers that ARE peer reviewed and say basically the same thing....

1
Bidensbrain2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Call FLCCC docs, there are a few other prescription meds that sometimes help beyond Ivm and HCQ. Fluoxamine and others.

You can probably even get the scripts filled as long as it's not ivm

1
Bidensbrain2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

How can we get Nikki some better material? Swollen balls are funny but it's pretty weak in terms of side effects.

11
Bidensbrain2020 11 points ago +11 / -0

100% agree, Hamilton audiences are the target market for vaccines, masks, and antiracism.

13
Bidensbrain2020 13 points ago +13 / -0

This is another good study to look at

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352837543_Analysis_of_COVID-19_vaccine_death_reports_from_the_Vaccine_Adverse_Events_Reporting_System_VAERS_Database_Interim_Results_and_Analysis

Clinically trained reviewers have undertaken a detailed analysis of a sample of the early deaths reported in VAERS (250 out of the 1644 deaths recorded up to April 2021). The focus is on the extent to which the reports enable us to understand whether the vaccine genuinely caused or contributed to the deaths. Contrary to claims that most of these reports are made by lay-people and are hence clinically unreliable, we identified health service employees as the reporter in at least 67%. The sample contains only people vaccinated early in the programme, and hence is made up primarily of those who are elderly or with significant health conditions. Despite this, there were only 14% of the cases for which a vaccine reaction could be ruled out as a contributing factor in their death.

1
Bidensbrain2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it needs to be removed. If there was a really dangerous virus and a working vaccine, it still should be a personal choice and people would probably see it as actually helpful and get it.

2
Bidensbrain2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the virus evolves ADE, or someone helps it along, then the vaccinated will really need to be protected. Perhaps this idea just slipped out.

Still doesn't seem like a reason to get it.

4
Bidensbrain2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

The at home tests we use is a piece of paper.

2
Bidensbrain2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think we know why, they are trying to kill off the productive parts of society

1
Bidensbrain2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

ACLU has already come out in favor of mandates, I read just today.

10
Bidensbrain2020 10 points ago +10 / -0

Wrong! Are you forgetting climate change? You must do carbon sequestration!

1
Bidensbrain2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

It does look like it, but it could also be some kind of lizard person exoskeleton.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›