Us too. I couldn't believe the arrogance and condensation we encountered. Like we were trying to hurt or child.
Well, at least it's filed under 'Rock Bottom'.
Amen. They are worth the fight. Well put.
It just makes me happy that a Critical Drinker tweet was highlighted in the article.
Fascinating. Truly.
This should be the top comment. The Deep State sends a 'Q' post including the word Ascension and then a shooting happens at a hospital called Ascension? Seems to me that they are using a false flag to confirm the legitimacy of the new 'Q'. Then the hijacking of the Great Awakening will kick into high gear.
“I have never seen a skinny person drinking Diet Coke.” -DJT
Right before a national holiday...
I think it refers to the difference in number between likes and dislikes, upvotes and down votes, etc. Usually meaning that you are getting WAY more negative feedback than positive.
Great post. Helped me to shake off the doom and get back to trusting the plan. Thank you.
I might have to as well. Christ I’m tired. Q team, where are you?
You are not insane. Or alone in that.
This. A million times this.
Fair enough. I don't usually lose my cool like that and I am always open for discussion.
I was raised to avoid "weasel words" in speaking and writing. Words like 'I think', 'It appears to me', just my opinion' and 'I believe' are weasel words and as I was taught are an unnecessary waste of time for your reader or listener. Make your assertion clearly and unequivocally. Explain your assertion in like manner. Your reader (or listener) will decide the merit of your offering.
As we were discussing an unknowable point (whether or not the latest Q posts are in fact from the same Q) I did not see the need to point out that my assertion was based in opinion and not fact.
My view is simply this: the latest Q posts are not from the same Q team. I have expected that the Cabal would attempt to post as Q and hijack the movement at some point if their attacks on 'QAnon' failed. I expect this simply because it is a logical step to take. Given that the board was shown to have been compromised and the new posts were shown to have been manipulated coupled with the stark change in tone, polish and content I find it very difficult to imagine they are legitimate.
I am of like mind to you in that I see no reason at all to change course from this view however, if they are real, good. If they are false, fine. But at this point it doesn't really matter. If 'Q' starts pushing DeSantis 2024, then I'll know for sure.
Just my opinion, for what its worth, your mileage may vary.
Yawn? What a cunt you are. I would respond to the rest of your post which is basically "no one REALLY knows so shut up" but your opening killed off any possibility of real conversation so I won't bother.
They haven't started the astray phase of Operation Seize Q yet. They have to establish the 'new' Q's credibility first.
Spot on. The board was compromised and they are trying to co-opt Q and steer anons astray. The posts are laughable in structure and content and can be safely ignored.
It isn't a coincidence; it's a plan.
I agree. This is not Q. The writing is off. The structure, the tone, everything.
The Dacia Sandero has one million less units!
Yes, please. Ready. Proceed. Engage. I cannot wait.
Digital identity, digital money, digital reality, digital slavery.
Indeed. Damn autocorrect.