1
Confabulation 1 point ago +1 / -0

The high cost of living has been solved and prices for everyday items, such as groceries and rent, are plummeting.

Don't fall for the democrats con job created to push a fake narrative about "affordability". Trump beat affordability and inflation has cooled. Doge checks are coming to every american, on top of that.

2
Confabulation 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol. I never really noticed how funny of a meme this is.

2
Confabulation 2 points ago +2 / -0

Understanding gives you the context needed to judge whether trust is warranted, while simple familiarity with a claim or source is often not enough.

A good rule is trust tentatively, then verify as much as the stakes require. These are super high stakes.

Now, it is true that one doesn't always need full understanding before trusting something. In everyday life, people rely on experts, tools, or institutions first and then build understanding over time, especially when the subject is complex.

So no, one does not HAVE to understand to trust. But in this modern world, with ever changing narratives and the great incentives in the click economy? I'm glad you and I have a near full understanding of The Plan even if you maybe don't know why it is important.

2
Confabulation 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is why I don't get why Trump would have Flo-rida, Young MC, and Vanilla Ice at the 250th.

Also: Long before the legal troubles, a voicemail from Donald Trump was featured as an interlude on Michel's 1998 debut solo album, Ghetto Supastar. Trump praised the rapper and predicted he would become a "big success".

1
Confabulation 1 point ago +1 / -0

You didn't answer my question. But if it is a rule, then it applies to everyone that uses the word "evil" or "good". That is something to watch out for!

3
Confabulation 3 points ago +3 / -0

Gotta understand it to trust it. And since it changes so consistently, it his hard for people other than you and I, to understand it. I sympathize.

1
Confabulation 1 point ago +1 / -0

Click economy. Outrage porn makes them wealthy. Don't you want the wealthy to get wealthier? It'd be unamerican not to.

2
Confabulation 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't know, the thread title says different.

3
Confabulation 3 points ago +3 / -0

With a $45 million net worth and 15-45 shows a year plus an annual Christmas show, I imagine she'll manage an american life. I personally don't know her or listen to that kind of music but I doubt she's very cool anyway. Good riddance.

1
Confabulation 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just don't understand the need for a false dichotomy here.

But if you must, I will concede that in the grander scheme, putting out all of the fires and stopping anyone who starts fires is indeed more important than stopping a single fire.

Anywayyy, both need to be done.

1
Confabulation 1 point ago +1 / -0

You insist on missing my point. I don't disagree with you that voting for the import of rapists is a bad thing.

I find it difficult to believe that you can't hold more than one truth in your head at once on this matter but it is what it is.

1
Confabulation 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know if you have created a family in the time you've spent here in the U.S. but if you have, and those children then went on to create a family, then you can already see the principle by which population growth occurs and has always occurred on this earth.

Were you under the impression that because there are more people on the planet than there were in 12A.D. that it is because aliens have populated the planet? And that is a more likely scenario than math mathing?

Let me ask you this. If you get a male and a female rabbit in the spring and then come back the next spring to see several more rabbits. Are most of them actually aliens?

3
Confabulation 3 points ago +3 / -0

They sent me to tell you this secret. Listen close and tell no one. Closer. It's His signature written in nature. Now, run along. And watch what you believe.

1
Confabulation 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was rhetorical. Socratic, if you will.

6
Confabulation 6 points ago +6 / -0

Found it!

Patagonia experiences severe, recurring seasonal wildfires, particularly during the South American summer months of January and February. Fueled by a combination of high winds, hot temperatures, and droughts. Seasonal wildfires have occurred in Patagonia for thousands of years.

3
Confabulation 3 points ago +3 / -0

All the founders were wrong? The constitution explicitly and in spirit, says otherwise. This is demoralising tripe. You accept being called livestock? Wow. This is one of those times that remind me of another quote "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities".Β 

Have some dignity, people. You know this is ultimate doomer shit.

1
Confabulation 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did we ever get a reason the down votes aren't working? Reminds me of how voting works in some countries. Candidate 1 or candidate 1. We have free and fair elections! See, you voted!

2
Confabulation 2 points ago +2 / -0

Boom!

"Nobody has the right to breach the peace in order to express First Amendment freedoms. Nobody has the right to trespass or block public thoroughfares".

You are correct, sir.

1
Confabulation 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do you think the admin thinks show stuff is useful on us? What has history taught us about this? What did q say about this?

1
Confabulation 1 point ago +1 / -0

You think ICE and the dept. of justice treats grandmothers that vote republican like adversaries? There must be a reference I'm not picking up on. We aren't that in need of persecution narratives are we?

1
Confabulation 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no state where you can legally go to a persons house and kill them because they were planning on and preparing to kill you. That is a military thing.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›