It's so aggravating to read these kinds of articles. (Thank you for posting btw).
Whenever I see the term "Disinformation expert" - I take it at face value. They are experts at creating disinformation.
They leave it out in the open for all to see and expect us to assume it means "Disinformation prevention expert".
I've got a plan for this and it seems to be working for and my personality...
When you're sitting around or taking with normies about whatever is happening, let them talk.
When it's your turn, simply say "Ya, I'm not falling for that again" - and just leave it at that.
Humans inherently don't like to knowingly be fooled - so they will have two options:
- Ask you why? (Be ready to give a quick answer)
- They will start asking questions or seeking truth or at least look for clues on what you meant by what you said
Just my 2 cents...
That's a fair comment. I wasn't calling you out. You can't argue with math formulas.
I just suspect in this case that somewhere the narrative is discouraging people who are much smarter than myself to actually putting their hands to the plow to find the solution...
For due diligence sake, let's call this out.
The narrative has always been "it takes too much energy to extract the H2 from H2o therefore don't bother trying it"
What if that is a lie like everything else? It could be legit, but obviously we have people being murdered when they get over the same target - so should be worth a look.
My ex-wife used to work for Apotex...I remember she would always mention now and then what a down to earth guy Barry was. I specifically he remember he used to drive an old Buick to work although he was a billionaire...
When we heard about what happened we were shocked...
Why do you need 4 databases? A single table with 38 records will be just fine thank you :)