2
Dysnomia 2 points ago +2 / -0

Voted early last week. Red county in Blue state. Was amazed how many people were out to vote at 10:00 in the morning on a weekday. Obvious win for Trump, but record numbers. We’re talking a one-stoplight town.

11
Dysnomia 11 points ago +11 / -0

I live near Delaware Water Gap. We have not had significant rain in 6-8 weeks. We are in serious, serious drought. Never have seen the ground so dry in my 60+ years. I’ve been praying for a week or two of slow, light, steady rain. Not praying for just rain. We need a prolonged period of slow, steady, rain to soften the ground and prepare it for heavier rains later. If we get heavy rains prior to the ground softening, it would be a colossal disaster. Think landslides, trees uprooting, and topsoil washed away. Not to mention won’t do any good for the water table. Please pray, anons. Not just for me, but for all who get their water from the Delaware River basin.

2
Dysnomia 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s gonna be a colossal shit show regardless of the winner.

8
Dysnomia 8 points ago +8 / -0

Dang. That’s a helluva dog. Metrics is usually a riddle for me, too, but what I think that you need here is actually a conversion to milligram chart bc the chart gives conversion to milliliters.

Still, The highest weight on the chart is 100lbs and dosage is 22.73 millimeters. (ml) So we double that and half again:

22.73 ml + 22.73 + 11.36 = 56.82 milliliters dosage for 250 pound Doggo.

The question, then, is what is the ratio of 56.82 milliliters to 222 mg?

Better yet… Why does the product give you conversion in milliliters when the tablets are weighed/measured in milligrams?

🧐

1
Dysnomia 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is sure about facts. Uses Wikipedia for source material.

KEK

2
Dysnomia 2 points ago +2 / -0

VERY interdasting. Thank you for your time and effort in having researched. In truth, I've not bothered to look, but somewhere in the back of my mind I seem to recall from having read other anons' digs, that the last name, "Schiff" had been changed from something else -- another surname-- along the way. But maybe I'm thinking about the Rothschilds. Regardless, anymore I'm of the "if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, then it's a duck" camp. ; )

1
Dysnomia 1 point ago +1 / -0

@BurnNewHistoryBooks

When I was in 10th grade, almost 50 years ago, I wrote a research paper about the bizarre relationship between Adolph Hitler and Eva Braun. Because it was such an usual topic, I had to use inter-library loan to get the books I wanted to use. In those days, it was a somewhat drawn out process to get your source materials. At any rate, the books took longer to get than had I just gone with the materials in the high school and/or local libraries. So my paper was late. But unlike many of my cohorts, I, at least, had actually read my sources, not merely paraphrased/summarized encyclopedia entries.

I wrote that paper on a manual typewriter, complete with Turabian citations and carefully executed erasures for my typos. In a word, it was flawless.

My history teacher accepted the late paper as though it were a personal favor in doing so. And of course, I could expect that I would get points off for lateness. Later, he kept me after class to question not the veracity of my claims, but rather, whether I had plagiarized. Apparently, it was so well-written that he was having difficulty believing a sophomore high school student had written it. Being somewhat, but not terribly, insulted, I told him that I'm a good writer, but that he would have no way of knowing that, given that he had not previously assigned any writing. I pointed out that thus far, his assessments had been mere multiple-choice quizzes which required only the memorization of information, such as the year in which Columbus had sailed the ocean blue, as opposed to assigning topics which required critical thinking skills, such as "refute or negate the claim, using textual evidence, as to whether Leif Erikson had actually been the first to discover the New World."

He stood there, mouth agape. And then dismissed me, without even giving me a pass for my next class, for which I was already late. In truth, figuring I was already late, I probably stopped in the bathroom to sneak a few drags of a cigarette prior to going to the next class, kek.

He returned my paper a few days later with no comments or corrections, just a big fat red A+ on the title page. That was it. And he never bothered me again, although he did begin to include short prompts on his quizzes which required written responses, usually adding up to 50% of that quiz grade, which I was easily able to bullshit my way through. For example: "Describe the life of an indentured servant during the American Colonial period." I mean all one has to do to effectively answer a question like that is to know the meaning of the phrase, "indentured servant." Still, he was trying.

But back to the Adolph Hitler/Eva Braun research paper: While I have long since lost or discarded it, and could not even begin to recall the titles of the sources I used, I can attest with certainty, ALL of my sources concurred:

Eva Braun was the niece of Adolph Hitler.

Surely, you, as someone who uses the moniker, "BurnNewHistoryBooks," would understand that.

o7

2
Dysnomia 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yea, but Braun was Hitler's niece, so the pedo-cestuous inference insults Trump.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›