4
EllipticCurveBall 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, and this is re-affirmed by the last line of her letter:

As the Senate enters that next phase, there are several items in the reports that merit the attention of your office. I am therefore forwarding the reports for your office’s consideration and, if you find it appropriate, further investigation as part of your ongoing oversight of these issues

5
EllipticCurveBall 5 points ago +5 / -0

I heard the word 'overwritten' and figured that meant updated not deleted; I can't edit the post title either way, but regardless this is super damning!

8
EllipticCurveBall 8 points ago +8 / -0

MSM, before the results even came out, said that it (the recount) showed Biden won --- this audit was never about a recount but was about forensically auditing the ballots themselves. The results of the forensic audit are currently being presented on the floor, and had not been presented at all this morning when MSM ran those hit pieces.

8
EllipticCurveBall 8 points ago +8 / -0

If this is the case, then it is incredibly frustrating that Dr Shiva would present something so easily debunked. I am going to wait for more info and assume he is smarter than that

11
EllipticCurveBall 11 points ago +11 / -0

Sorry for poor quality footage, I happened to be recording and was using my microphone for audio so you can hear me typing etc rather than it being a direct audio feed, wasn't expecting to use the footage and for the cyberninjas team to drop a bomb this huge

5
EllipticCurveBall 5 points ago +5 / -0

Everyone with a twitter should reply to that tweet with this photo: https://i.imgur.com/mRBrhOO.jpg

LOL - proof is in the pudding, lmao. Stamped as 'approved' with no signature at all!

27
EllipticCurveBall 27 points ago +27 / -0

This is supposed to be a stamp they stamp onto the ballot AFTER its returned, to confirm the signature was valid and approved. Instead it's behind the signature triangle implying it was printed and in the wrong layer order or just all together faked and not a true scan of a valid physical document or something else, just my speculations

4
EllipticCurveBall 4 points ago +4 / -0

Many of my republican friends fell for it, had to explain to them the audit results werent even out yet

1
EllipticCurveBall 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most likely a Twitter bug

3
EllipticCurveBall 3 points ago +3 / -0

5k likes, 20m views. Twitter fucks w/ the true like count for Dan I swear

3
EllipticCurveBall 3 points ago +3 / -0

This seems too small and irrelevant to be a false flag

1
EllipticCurveBall 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not following the math in this article; it seems the pre-"third trimester" would have to be applied proportionally not just arbitrarily only to miscarriages but not those that went to term.

If you share this article w/ someone who is blue pilled they will likely accuse you of fake news because this page is just playing with numbers arbitrarily to get high values it seems, I don't consider what they did valid

11
EllipticCurveBall 11 points ago +11 / -0

Friendly reminder that Trump never called for 21 days of prayer. An organization called LetUsWorship called for 21 days of prayer over 9/11 memoriam, Trump, while speaking on the 9/11 anniversary, commended this organization for their call of 21 days of prayer, it was then misquoted as him calling for 21 days of prayer and stickied here which has caused lots of confusion. The 21 days of prayer was a third party organization and was relevant to 9/11, it has nothing to do with Q and is now being erroneously used to datefag

by Quelle
2
EllipticCurveBall 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where did he say that. Did you watch the video? He thanked the organization for calling 9/11 memmoriams to 21 days of prayer, that’s it. Because of the misleading video title that was stickied People on this forum are now acting as if this is part of the Q plan and are using it to datefag.

9
EllipticCurveBall 9 points ago +9 / -0

Where did he say that. Did you watch the video? He thanked the organization for calling 9/11 memmoriams to 21 days of prayer, that’s it. Because of the misleading video title that was stickied People on this forum are now acting as if this is part of the Q plan and are using it to datefag.

2
EllipticCurveBall 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where did he say that. Did you watch the video? He thanked the organization for calling 9/11 memmoriams to 21 days of prayer, that’s it. Because of the misleading video title that was stickied People on this forum are now acting as if this is part of the Q plan and are using it to datefag.

3
EllipticCurveBall 3 points ago +3 / -0

He said at 7:03 in this video, and I quote, “I want to thank LetUsWorship [organization] for calling Americans to 21 days of prayer [for 9/11]”.

The video title has misled you and thousands more. Be mad at the YouTube uploader not me. LetUsWorship called for 21 days of prayer, not Trump, and it was for 9/11 vigil, not Q

10
EllipticCurveBall 10 points ago +10 / -0

He said at 7:03 in this video, and I quote, “I want to thank LetUsWorship [organization] for calling Americans to 21 days of prayer [for 9/11]”.

The video title has misled you and thousands more. Be mad at the YouTube uploader not me. LetUsWorship called for 21 days of prayer, not Trump, and it was for 9/11 vigil, not Q

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›