18
Euphemism 18 points ago +18 / -0

And those that gave the order , all the way up the chain until a chain/rope is around the head monkey in that farce called life.

1
Euphemism 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is possible to escape the con... YOU STOP PLAYING THE GAME !!!!!

But if you can't and won't - it is because of stuff. Which is my point.

You could stop it - You chose not to stop it(because you continue on playing the game). Don't blame anyone else - it is You. Until we all see that - there will always an excuse, there will always a reason, and it will always not matter.

So with that in mind - YES, yes I do pay attention to whom I buy coffee from. Whom I pay for meat and groceries. That is the moral and ethical obligation I have to me, and mine.

Finally - no one is shaming anyone. Really and truly. You are you, and I am sure you are an awesome person with awesome ideas and shit.. We just disagree here.

The choice is yours. Just don't willingly go swimming and then complain you are wet.

3
Euphemism 3 points ago +3 / -0

With all due respect - no. You have a choice all the way down, all the way along the line. To claim now - "Bro, but bro, its so hard when they make it soo easy"..... is a cop out.

I am sure it varies by location, but you can remove your pension to a private, under your direction, account. If it can't - why are you working there? To each their own, but working somewhere where they will take your money and not give you access to it - means it isn't your money. There is no argument in that is there? You're doing it because it is easier, there is more benefit for you, etc, etc, etc, and, and, and... but

Throughout history, almost without exception, when we are faced with more than 1 option it is between one that we know deep down is right, and one that is expedient/sweet/easy/(whatever pull)..... In exactly 0 cases, is the easiest choice the right one.

We as a society(this is much larger than just this) have allowed ourselves to consistently pick the easy, pick the simple, pick the more stuff, more items, more, more, more, more........ and all of it was a con. As the old saying goes - We traded our gold for their trinkets, our wealth for their paper, and our children's freedom for illusions of safety for us.

Until we all see our role in this there is nothing that can be done.

You and only you are responsible for your actions. To claim that no one wants to support something, while in the very next sentence state that you do so, :

"I highly doubt anyone here wants to support companies that do evil. /// Every day we invest in companies that don’t have our best interests at heart

If that is the case - who forced you to invest there? Where was the gun to your head? There wasn't one. You do what you do, because you wanted to do it. The rest is just excuses.

2
Euphemism 2 points ago +2 / -0

And it is all part of the plan - and the Brits(along with the rest of us) have been slowly sleep walking into it.

3
Euphemism 3 points ago +3 / -0

I see you have paid attention to the rule book they use..

Everyone every where should know that THAT is exactly what will happen at these camps. The kids will be treated badly, in direct contrast to the clot-shotted who will be treated like gold. Sooner or later the kids will figure out that they can be treated like gold if they just do this one little thing that their parents will never have to know about...

Just like the public education system.... errrr..... I mean public grooming system. The parents are not a concern, they don't own their kids!!! (The state does)..

7
Euphemism 7 points ago +7 / -0

They did it all over the place back then too. Before the lead up to the Iraq invasion every time there was a mention of 9/11 they mentioned Saddam Hussien. Everytime they mentioned Saddam, they mentioned 9/11. Saddam, 9/11, 9/11, Saddam, 9/11, Saddam....

To no one's surprised > 50% of American people thought Saddam was responsible for 9/11, the entire thing was like a class in how to manipulate people. It was the same how every country that didn't like invading people without cause suddenly no longer were a "country" they now were always referred to as "regimes".

It really underlines the notion that ignorance is bliss.

Who would want to be "awake" only to know that you get a front row seat for a slow-mo car crash where everyone you know and love gets killed over the obvious issues they refuse to see and as an added bonus (Insert Billy May Hays here) you are ridiculed for trying to save them..... Yep, good times, good times.

3
Euphemism 3 points ago +3 / -0

Look at that goof in the grey suit. Fucking soy smile.

All of them should meet the same fate as Hussein and Ghaddifi(sp?) got. FFS, they have arguably hurt and killed FAR MORE people than those two small time goons.

5
Euphemism 5 points ago +5 / -0

And the same plan is in place in Canada....and various other WEF compromised nations.

Sadly, I wouldn't be surprised to see it somewhere within the US as well, just waiting to be pushed forward when eyes are somewhere else.

1
Euphemism 1 point ago +1 / -0

asking them to argue based on merit, is like asking a carp to teach you calculus.

The man is a traitor from my understanding of the Law, and if this was happening in the 60's I believe truly every Canadian would feel the same.

2
Euphemism 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep, It is a real black pill when you realise a lot of the people that "woke" someone up to the issues are themselves part of the system of control, can lead many people into the circular logic of :

"I know this now."

"But I know this, because of them"

"So they know that I know"

"But I know that they know, that I know ...

Ahh fuck it dude, lets' go bowling.

12
Euphemism 12 points ago +12 / -0

People in every country that is engaging in this idiocy should do the same....

2
Euphemism 2 points ago +2 / -0

And yet despite will all that outside support, all that media propaganda, all of everything - they "won" by 197K votes, and shortly after the election 205K votes were found and never counted.

The Canadian election is as gamed as the American one was. So no, I don't believe for a second there are any significant amount of Trudeau or Liberal supporters even in big city's.

In DT Toronto there are posters of "FAKE ALLY" with Trudeau's face plastered all over it. There are similar posters I have seen in midtown as well.

6
Euphemism 6 points ago +6 / -0

It is amazing what people refuse to understand, when they have a vested interest in not understanding it.

5
Euphemism 5 points ago +5 / -0

Who? Who would do this? The entire liberal base is white women and third world immigrants(just as his father devised). The white women won't do shit, and the third worlders don't care who gives them the gibs, so there is no loyalty there.

I don't see it, and I sadly spend too much time in Toronto.

8
Euphemism 8 points ago +8 / -0

So it is violent over there when they are there.

It is violent over here when they are here.

If only there was some common denominator, some pattern, something to tie these completely unrelated and unconnected things together.

Where the fuck is Columbo when you need him?

5
Euphemism 5 points ago +5 / -0

It doesn't. It is just used to muddy the waters to make people that are looking for a moral/ethical way to justify it to themselves.

Just like the "clump of cells" argument they use. Point out that everything is essentially a clump of cells, including them and they will - without fail - agree and nod their head knowingly before moving on to their next argument. They know it is BS, but they will use whatever excuse/reason they can to justify what they want.

-4
Euphemism -4 points ago +2 / -6

Your argument is that because he was involved with 2000 mules, then that means he is legit here or at least be considered as legit, because 2K mules came out... and this wait-game is to build an audience?

OK, but he already had an audience(from 2k mules), and he already said he would come out with something - and didn't.

With that in mind, maybe the reason that 2000 mules came out wasn't because of him, but because of the 100's of other people and their efforts to bring about that movie. The same way that any time someone or something successful happens there are the usual grifters that pull along for their extended or added fame/glory/etc - all the more so if the audience of the successful thing is desperate for more of whatever success.

There is nothing presumptuous, or incorrect about my post. Carry on though, no need to get bent out of shape over someone's opinion.

-6
Euphemism -6 points ago +3 / -9

I go where I please, you're welcome. I come across threads from the .win communities so I see all the communities. If I wanted to block people's opinions I would have stayed on Digg.

You can trust the plan, without trusting the people exploiting the plan. Right?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›