All of them were programmed. Do you think it is remotely possible that they all undertook a suicide mission for a few thousand dollars? Our adversaries spent decades to learn exactly how to create human robots like this. These sad creatures are just meat. It's the programmers who need to fry.
Most of the first shell of sats were launched into a 53 degree orbit. If you look at https://satellitemap.space/ you see a high concentration of sats at 53 degrees, then very few above that latitude. Above that (alaska) are served by polar orbit sats, but there are fewer. More recent launces cover the 43 deg. The more sats they launch the more bandwidth they have. Also, the newer sats V2 mini have about 4x the bandwidth as the older v1.0 and v1.5. But yes we definitely share BW with those in our cell (15 miles wide) and also with the whole sat in general (20 Gbps). Some people live in areas at full capacity (until more sats are launched)
Each satellite has spot beams which cover a certain area. A 'cell' is about 15 miles wide. Those within that cell share available bandwidth. http://www.satmagazine.com/story.php?number=1026762698
Each sat(v1) has a total bandwidth of about 20Gbps which is also shared.
It's also worth noting that the smear investigation against Jordan was conducted by DS political hit team Perkins Coie in 2018. FBI has a 'secure work environment' WITHIN Perkins Coie. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygkqxeBKFFw
It's real. Don't be low energy. https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1710076620995006556?s=20
It is exceptionally difficult to land an aircraft with no glideslope indicators. Modern aircraft and airports have several redundant systems. Flight 77 which 'hit' the Pentagon had NONE of those.
It had no localizer beam which tells the pilot if they are high/low or right/left It had no Visual Glideslope Indicators like VASI or PAPI which tell the pilot using white/red lights if they are high or low. It had no GPS for RNAV.
Not only was the story of a half trained 'pilot' making a near impossible 'landing' into the pentagon unbelievable by itself, it is then compounded by the speed of the 'landing' aircraft. It was supposedly traveling at 530 mph, far beyond the normal landing speeds of any aircraft, thereby making any kind of visual adjustments into the target impossible. In fact that speed is far beyond the Vne (never exceed velocity) of that aircraft (757) at that low altitude.
A half trained 'pilot' with no glideslope indicators could never hit that target at that speed. A veteran pilot with 30,000 hours could not hit that target at that speed. But we are asked to believe that three rank amateurs all pulled it off without fail?
What they want us to believe is not only impossible, it requires us to believe several stacked and nested impossibilities.
Gravity falls off at an inverse R^2 relationship, just means that when you double the distance between 2 objects, gravity is 4x less and so on. The moon has influence because it is so close. The Sun has influence because it is so massive. The other planets, even if they happen to be aligned, exert almost zero gravitational influence on earth. Much less than the moon by itself.
The other point is trying to locate the event to one fault or region. Gotta be skeptical on this one. People who make lots of predictions are occasionally 'right'.
One gene that is present in other primates but not in humans is the myosin gene(MYH16) which codes for the myosin protein. Primates who have that gene intact grow very large jaw muscles on the top of their heads allowing for much stronger jaw function. Lacking those muscles, humans use that space for a larger brain.
Brain size expansion occurred over the next 2+ million years from 300cc to the modern nearly 1500cc. Brain tissue is very energy demanding. At ~3lbs it uses roughly 20% of total daily calorie consumption. If that larger brain isn't paying for itself with better survivability (hunting, fighting, food prep,social skills etc) then it won't outcompete the smaller brains around it.
Just theory. It could all be dead wrong.
As pertaining to the Q post, my take is that certain early advanced human (or other) civilizations have had knowledge and control of the human genome. Our five senses require a perfect choreography of gene expression in our development. The conclusion we form are based on information those five senses allow. In 'The Matrix', all of those senses and the information they gathered were controlled externally. If our '6th sense' has been intentionally disable through genetic manipulation it would make the human population far easier to control.
If you took a 1000 people who are awake to the realities of the world and genetically compared them to a 1000 of the most sleepy of normies, would you see a genetic difference? Would certain gene alleles pop out? Is that the reason for mass 23andme genetic testing? To identify those who are prone to waking up?
She seems like another Agency bitch who got bumped over to "social media influencer" aka fake whistleblower after getting fired from her infiltration job in Fl.
She also retweets other obvious Agency fags like Krassenstein. They all stink the same.
What kind of fat do humans make ourselves when we consume excess calories? Saturated fat. If it was so harmful and pathogenic would that be the case?
We also have the ability to create monounsaturated fat from saturated fat via the SCD1 enzyme, as needed.
Beware of lard and chicken fat. Those are monogastric animals so their fats tend to have high levels of O6 polyunsaturated fats when they are fed non appropriate grains. Cattle do better even when fed grains.
One hypothesis as to why Americans have become obese is the much higher consumption of O6 linoleic acid, which are unstable and quickly decay to 2-AG and Anandamide which activate cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2. Similar to marijuana smoking causes the 'munchies'. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1038/oby.2012.38
He was part of the charade. An actor in a play, timed perfectly for full effect. Did they threaten his family and himself with horrible consequences if he didn't play along? Did they promise him riches and a quick exit from prison? Is he even in prison at all? Means, motive, and opportunity are all perfectly satisfied with that operation. A small investment of time, money and expertise was expended to reap massive rewards. If they have the capability, which they certainly do, a better question would be, 'Why WOULDN'T they do it?'
The Sierra snowpack is at 245% of normal for this date. https://cdec.water.ca.gov/snowapp/sweq.action Utah and CO are also way above normal.
Tom Cotton is owned by aipac ($237,077). Israel Firster.