Oh boy. Robinhood is citadel which is one of the hedges most over extended in the GME saga.
Everytime the price hits x number where in which the hedges kill themselves, Robinhood which is citadel, stops trading on their platform. Thereby mitigating their losses and fucking the little guy. Robinhood CEO committed perjury and claimed it was an update or technical fault or whatever bullshit.
Funny how they think they have credibility after 6 months of saying we killed some guy with a fire extinguisher. They claim you're right Mr president it wasn't a fire extinguisher it was American flags as if that's somehow better.
Number one, zero credibility. Number two, I pray if I get attacked I'm hit with an American flag and not a fire extinguisher.
I'll say this knowing I would never do this. But you should tabulate what days and how many winners and what amount. Would be an interesting data point.
This is how you defeat ai and facial recognition as well. Works both ways. You can let tech fuck you, or flip it and do some fucking.
Yes. There are lots of religious folks on this board and you may very well be one. If you are, I would ask you, are men not infallible? My understanding is no man is perfect but Jesus. Now I'm not religious, but I do follow the same general tenets. No man is perfect. Still likely a great person, but perfect? What are we arguing here? They way I see it he's either wrong or he sees the bigger picture. I'm okay with both. I know I don't have all the information one way or another.
It's irrelevant who he is. If you blindly follow any one person you're just as bad as the "sheep" we claim the other side to be.
I don't disagree only nuance is that you (in most cases especially in the states) pick your own doc, so back to the self responsibility. Yeah at some point in the line heads need to roll, but if you ever thought that anyone else had your best interest in mind better then yourself you've been misled. I'm probably preaching to the choir here in that regard, but if anyone wonders why there is little compassion, it's because that's life. And if you've payed attention and read history it's painfully obvious you're largely on your own, and you're damn sure responsible for everything you do.
Congrats. Doesn't change anything.
Yep. If your company is fucking you, go to a lawyer, not HR. Because that's exactly what HR will do when they decide you may be a bigger problem then the problem you are addressing.
Life isn't fair. You're expecting orange man to look our for your best interests better then you can?
TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR ACTIONS. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM.
Yes. Wake the fuck up. This is real life. You make life or death decisions every day. If you trust the man in the tv with your health over yourself and your personal doctor your a fucking retard.
IMO anyone like him who posts as much as he did, posts too much. I specifically remember some of his posts (idk if that's saying anything because of the volume).
He's a power user and those guys sit on the line of what's really necessary on a board like this. Those are almost always the accounts that flip, get sold, or activated and turn into the worst of trolls, because they are big accounts who've built up trust and tenure on a forum like this.
Putting words into others mouths is typically a leftist tactic, but I don't care enough to stop you.
And I can talk about you and your crazy evangelical delusions. See how that works? It's a TV show. Don't watch it.
I thought q folks deleted Netflix anyways?
I would think it's pretty safe to say they were all leftists. I don't understand the surprise either. Just more fake emotions from an npc.
You're like an evangelical telling children not to watch Harry Potter.
If you're too simple minded to separate fiction from reality you need a fucking doctor.
No, I know there's nothing worth paying attention to on Twitter.
It looks like fucking Kevin spacey of all people playing mike pompeo.
I don't buy that's Mike for a half second. There is something majorly wrong with the person in that photo and weight loss doesn't explain it.
Fren this train has no brakes.
Operate at a marginal profit or loss. Force other companies out of buisness, sweep up customers, Jack up prices, profit.
Netflix, but with countries.
For reference
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
IMO that's one vague ass run on sentence.
What I understand of that is this:
The constitution and the laws that are made in accordance with said constitution (and treaties) should be the supreme law of the land.
This is where it seems vague or even contradictory.
Judges should rule according to the constitution, federal law or state law, assuming they do not contradict.
Now I think it's a safe assumption that they are implying that fed law is supreme by the first half. That second half though I feel could possibly leave ambiguity in that it doesn't direct a judge as to which law would be higher in the case of contradiction. And to okay devil's advocate on that part, it doesn't mention enforcing or following federal laws. It quite clearly says:
and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
If you take the thereby to include the previous half, that would include federal law. But if you don't, and where I'll play devil's advocate here it directs judges to follow the Constitution and state laws assuming no contradiction.
Which will bring me back to the first part following the same train of thought. They talk about The United States. Are they talking about a singular federal entity, or are they talking about a group of states in which laws are made accordingly?
I picked it apart a bit too much even for my liking. I as the clause is, you get a general sense of what it's trying to accomplish, but trying to nail down specifics with a sentence like that I think would be difficult to prove one way or another short of digging the guys up and asking.
Either someone on outside or it's no different then it currently is but with less manufactured drama.
I remember she posted some fucking sign on her door so her fellow congress people would be forced to see it.
Who gives a shit. Do something for us. I don't want entertainment I want results.
It's actually a really nice way to say I don't give a fuck what you do I've made up my mind.