i say let the trans humanist worship their false gods. if they cant be arsed to go to church, then let them sit on their asses, let them follow their false idols. let the blind be blind.
reduce my refund by $54.36 to cover a tax obligation from 2023. Which I was unaware of and so was my accountant.
i would ask the irs how they came up with that number and the agent who authorized it. the implication is that you consent to them making changes (to documents you signed under penalty or perjury) without your knowledge or consent. IRC Section 6065 requires the agent to rely on personal knowledge which they cant do. $60 may be nothing but it may also bite you in the ass later if uncontested.
military is the only way. its more than a cool quote, its foreshadowing.
its been what, 8 years and people still dont understand the concept of floating ideas around?
Wahh, JuSt Do It AlReAdY
make me rich? im in it to topple a broken system, getting rich is a side effect.
dont be surprised if their chicken isnt chicken.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1903464677939851756.html
🧵🧵 The Law Firms that Run DC
I see a lot of articles saying how President Trump is attacking law firms in Washington DC because he is vindictive. When in fact, it has nothing to do with being vindictive, and everything to do with the fact that they are acting like an extension of the Democratic Party.
This web shows how elite law firms in DC have become de facto political actors, coordinating with bureaucrats, Democratic campaigns, and activist groups to advance one side’s agenda while insulating allies from legal consequences.
- Perkins Coie
Partisan Alignment: Strongly Democratic
Key Players: Marc Elias, Michael Sussmann
Involved In:
•Russiagate:
•Hired Fusion GPS on behalf of the Clinton campaign and DNC to create the Steele Dossier.
•Michael Sussmann was indicted for allegedly lying to the FBI about the source of Alfa Bank/Trump server claims (acquitted, but case exposed coordination between Clinton-linked lawyers and the intelligence community).
•Through Marc Elias, aggressively litigated to change election laws in battleground states pre-2020 (e.g., mail-in ballot rules, signature matching, ballot curing).
•Litigated against voter ID laws and redistricting efforts favoring GOP, using courts to alter rules under the guise of civil rights.
- Elias Law Group
Partisan Alignment: 100% Democratic
Key Player: Marc Elias (founder, formerly at Perkins Coie)
Involved In:
•Election Lawfare:
•Filed hundreds of lawsuits between 2020–2024 aimed at changing ballot deadlines, preventing voter roll purges, and invalidating state-level election reforms.
•Sued states that passed voter integrity laws (Georgia, Texas, Arizona).
•Legal and strategic support for efforts to disqualify Trump from ballots under the 14th Amendment (Section 3).
- WilmerHale
Partisan Alignment: Center-left establishment
Key Players: Robert Mueller, Jamie Gorelick
Involved In:
•Russiagate:
•Mueller was a WilmerHale partner before becoming special counsel.
•Several senior lawyers on Mueller’s team (Aaron Zebley, James Quarles) came from WilmerHale.
•Created a direct pipeline from a private DC firm to a politically charged investigation.
•WilmerHale defended companies and figures potentially affected by the Mueller investigation—raising questions about impartiality.
- Latham & Watkins
Partisan Alignment: Progressive-leaning, deep resistance ties
Key Players: Kathryn Ruemmler (former Obama WH Counsel), multiple Obama-era appointees
Involved In:
•Lawfare Against Trump Policies:
•Litigated against Trump’s immigration, environmental, and regulatory rollbacks.
•Supported amicus briefs in support of January 6 prosecutions.
•Close ties to Biden DOJ officials (Ruemmler has known connections to current White House legal networks).
- Covington & Burling
Partisan Alignment: Deep Obama/Biden ties
Key Players: Eric Holder, Lanny Breuer
Involved In:
•Russiagate/Deep State Entrenchment:
•Holder and Breuer returned to Covington after serving in the Obama DOJ.
•Firm has represented major tech and surveillance companies with ties to federal investigations.
•Defended figures in the intelligence community during investigations into FISA abuse and surveillance.
- Debevoise & Plimpton
Partisan Alignment: Institutional left
Key Player: Mary Jo White (Obama SEC Chair), Andrew Ceresney
Involved In:
•Representing Hunter Biden in federal tax and firearms-related investigations.
•Helped negotiate controversial plea agreement that collapsed in 2023.
•Close ties to DOJ officials overseeing investigations of Hunter Biden. Scrutiny over sweetheart deals and unusual coordination.
- Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison
Partisan Alignment: Progressive legal elite
Key Players: Jeh Johnson (Obama DHS), Loretta Lynch (Obama AG)
Involved In:
•Represented progressive groups in redistricting and voting rights lawsuits.
•No comparable representation for free speech or conservative plaintiffs, reinforcing political asymmetry.
•Consulted by Democratic-aligned NGOs on how to frame post-2020 election audit challenges as “threats to democracy.”
- Jenner & Block
Partisan Alignment: J6-focused, anti-Trump
Key Players: Donald Verrilli (Obama SG), Ian Gershengorn
Involved In:
•January 6 Committee Staffing:
•Provided legal support and volunteers to the J6 Committee.
•Ties to lawfare efforts to charge Trump advisors and allies. •Worked behind the scenes with groups like Lawfare Blog and Brookings to craft legal theories around “insurrection” and “disqualification.”
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
Partisan Alignment: Corporate Dem establishment
Key Players: Greg Craig (former Obama WH Counsel, indicted)
Involved In:
•Ukraine Lobbying Scandal:
•Paid millions by pro-Russian Ukrainian interests via Paul Manafort.
•Fined for failing to register under FARA. No major prosecutions of Skadden lawyers, despite harsh treatment of Manafort.
•Avoided accountability while similar conduct was used to hammer Trump affiliates.
this war will never be over. the goal is to make them so small, so minuscule that they would never be able to establish a stronghold by subversion ever again.
hes not. wait for the next steps to see if your current prediction is still accurate.
Synagogue of Satan
Why does Jesus use this phrase to refer to those who are opposing the mission of the kingdom of God? The name “Satan” means Accuser. And a synagogue was a gathering place. If you put them together, then it is a gathering place of the accuser. (ex: gathering in front of a tv)
The bible gives more clues as to the identity in Revelations 3:9
Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.
The same language is used in Revelations 2:9 for those who are “slandering” and again “say that they are Jews and are not.”
I know your afflictions and your poverty—yet you are rich! I know about the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.
It's somewhat similar to Paul’s language in Romans 2:28-29
28 For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:
29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.
Because they are not part of the mission of God, they are no longer to be considered the people of God. You cannot be in direct opposition to Jesus Christ, who is the true Israel, and consider yourself as still being a Jew. You are, as Paul said, only one outwardly.
Anyone involved in slander, lying, accusations or dehumanizing is aligning with Satan's work. While this passage primarily addresses Christian persecution, it extends to all who actively oppose the Kingdom of God and persecute believers, identifying them as part of Satan's work. This would make them a member of the synagogue of Satan.
Matthew 7:15-20
15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves.
16 You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles?
17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit.
18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit.
19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.
20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.
the only thing i have to offer in that regards are a bunch of videos from Karl Lentz. he explains it really well.
what youre describing is called common law.
if you want to judge me based off my name, ill judge you based off our conversation. you get paid per comment, enjoy your last deposit.
your comment is the difference between having a sound argument and ad hominem
your comment is the difference between ground level and 40k ft birds eye view.
you can sit back and enjoy the show or you can be the guy that scream at the people on tv.
there is ZERO requirement for practicing law. the lie is you need a license to practice law but the truth is you wont find a single lawyer or judge with a license to practice law.
Which relies on the false presumptions they make upon your property status to form a false nexus.
Also your zip code which is a federal phenomenon would have nothing to do with county property tax.
Fight the false presumptions instead of worrying about zip codes.
Agreed, but its also your responsibility to refute any w-2 or 1099 forms when you file. But now youre arguing income vs compensation, it doesnt end there.
Ultimately you have to rescind your consent to have a SS number assigned to you. From my understanding they wont actually update any records but you can use that letter to the SSA as evidence and hold them liable for the error resulting from their inaction.
the downside: you give up all access to federal programs. social security, medicaid, unemployment, all of it.
in theory; not financial advice.
correct, because i am foreign to the government in the context of 26 usc.
i dont need to read it, challenging the 16th amendment says all i need to know.
you cant challenge the 16, courts deemed it constitutional. what you have to argue is whether or not you even have a tax liability to begin with.
if they tell you its wrong and file again, remind them under 26 usc 6201 they are authorized to make corrections based on personal knowledge. if you change your return, youre admitting to making a mistake. if they change your return, theyre committing fraud.
did he go to jail for his taxes or because he was sharing his methods with everyone else? it matters because the irs would rather let a few slip through the cracks but if you try to widen that crack so others can fall through then youre making yourself a target.
i did that shit back in 2020, filed as nra and got my money back.
DISCLAIMER: do not follow my footsteps if you dont know how to litigate in court. hiring a lawyer isnt going to help you.
its the mark of man.
what element has 6 protons, 6 electrons and 6 neutrons. (carbon)