That isn't easy for parents who work full time and can't afford to
Q never promised a big leak. He promised for something to eventually be done and that we are in an information war. And that is very apparent today. I don't many here trying to intentionally lie. People are being manipulated in many directions. You, I and everybody. Q did leak stuff as evidence that he has insider knowledge. The point of Q is plausible deniability. If it was obvious af, they could of taken down the previous administration with ease. I'm not saying your guy is fake as IDK enough about him. Idk how Q is somehow a "clinton mafia" asset. I do find it odd how some follow Q's word like gospel. I don't think that is right, however. I think people will do that after the serious corruption that has plagued their government for a long time. Their are anons outside the US also. Most of these people that claim to be "anons" are not anons. They are just part of the movement like myself. People will reject something if to them, it sounds very similar. They think and believe it distracts them from the truth
"McCraw did not say which agency removed Ruiz from school grounds". I wonder what agency was pulling the strings that day....
I don't know of anyone that's called it "spaghetti-gate" and nobody (maybe some) calls him "Q-anon". There's "Q" and "anons". I can tell you from my own research, some of which is on my old twitter and I have hard drives full of information, Pizzagate is no hoax! Many of us contributed our own independent research and I didn't believe it at first. The darkest pits of the web that we had to go through just to find the truth is phenomenal! I thought it was balls till I looked at it myself. Maybe the timing is off or something and idk about your guy. But using your personal experience to devalue our own research just because it conflicts with yours, makes you look like you are seeking personal attention. We are on this website and many in our movement are very well aware that the pedo ring does not just apply to one side of a political aisle. We as the "Q-Anon" community have exposed republicans and democrats alike and many other political parties in many other countries. As I think you would know. It is a common form of blackmail and that tends to be the biggest factor in this, whilst you can argue that everyone else is deluded. We wouldn't even have this mass following of people investigating for themselves if "Q-anon" didn't release snippets of information to begin with. I would say before slandering "Q-anon", I recommend you actually read all the posts before pointing the larp finger at everyone else. Qalerts.app
Q wasn't didn't even post in 2016, he posted in 2017 and wasn't even called Q at the start. Pizzagate started in 2016 before Q was even there. Q has exposed Republicans and Democrats. It's almost like you never read a thing Q said. I'm well aware that both are involved in nefarious activities. Q also said the same. But guess you never looked at the posts. And sure I can. Although Q does not make massive leaks. This would be unproductive. Q spreads breadcrumbs for other people to follow themselves. If I leaked information of a mass conspiracy and showed it to the world, they wouldn't believe it due to MSM censorship and narrative spinning. But if I gave hints at what to look for and helped other people to find out for themselves, then they will eventually find it out for themselves. It sure does seem like you have never actually heard of Q and you have taken your own narrative based on this
Pizzagate wasn't a hoax. It was a theory based on the strange words used in clinton and podesta's emails. And some of us already know that it's real. Like. You don't even want to see some of the stuff we have seen on that. It's real and it is absolutely horrifyingly, insidiously, demented and twisted as fuck stuff. So forgive me if I don't take your witness account seriously if you won't take my witness account seriously either
Anyone help me get US citizenship and move to the US lol
I don't think Assange is a bad guy. He was looking for truth to be exposed. He embarrassed the Clintons after he published HRC's emails
I didn't download it. It opened in a new tab. Was on wikileaks so I didn't think they'd try and trap their audience.
"and hoping to explosive 2020"
True. But people need to know why it's going to make a difference. I'm not an American so I can't vote. If I was, I would. But people who get cheated once are less likely to vote
I get where he is coming from. Maybe the midterms and 2024 elections are secured. But how is the American people meant to establish trust when their own allegations of fraud and evidence is regarded as "conspiracies"? I think that's what Patel is missing. If he backtracks and maybe tells us or even hints that the votes will be counted fairly, then he wouldn't be sounding ignorant as he is now.
So. People seeing a guy who actually kept his campaign promises being cheated and clearly rigged against who are then coming to realise that their "free" and "fair" elections are rigged, then deciding it's pointless is some how protesting? They aren't protesting. Their disenfranchised by the illusion of democracy. Nobody is going to vote if they don't think their vote will count. It's like buying a ticket to a venue and being told to fuck off. Would you go to that venue again?
Can an someone here with a TS account ask him something for me? I don't vote here in the UK as all of our politicians are crooked and all the politicians ever do is lie. Any political party that genuinely wants to change our system, lies their ass off. So ask Patel what I should do? Vote for more liars??? It only encourages them...
I'm about the same. Since I was around 9/10, I was very interested in the JFK assassination. Was never really into the Watergate scandal. Nixon was illegally spying on the DNC. In regards to the attempt to steal documents is the big mystery of that. Was he set up? If not, what did he think he would obtain from the DNC? What dirt was discovered by Nixon's spying? What was the CIA's interest in this affair? That's the questions that the media should of asked, but instead, they made the DNC look like victims.
Edward Howard Hunt. He confessed on his deathbed to having knowledge on the plot to kill JFK. Then he was found at watergate in one of the break ins
I wonder if that grammatical error is intentional
Was clear that RRN was false after everything they said had nothing to back up their articles and made constant false predictions
Maybe. You too
Might not make sense to you. But for some what I will describe as "autists" for lack of a better term, makes sense to them. Some people are very good at pattern recognition while to you, it sounds batshit crazy and nonsense.
What's with the insults?
Paras? Not surprised like. 31 times they snuck girls in for them to notice only recently? Should get a promotion!
It's a joke
That's all good for those that have that. Many people don't. Many people who live in suburban areas don't have access to that and are allowed to keep chickens (like you'd want to in a small plot of land. They stink like fuck). I know how to cook, I know how to live off the land. But I think you're missing my point. For some people, that isn't an option either by law/legislation or their financial situations. It's easy enough to slap your hands and say "problem solved". But it isn't straight forward. Most people where I live in the suburban areas aren't allowed chickens or any pet (like it would stop them). However, it doesn't stop some folk. Some live in very violent conditions where their plants and livestock would just get nicked by some dodgy person that should be locked up. Idk about the US and how easy that would be. But it ain't easy here