2
Gaterop 2 points ago +2 / -0

Deleted my other post, tough to find since they reposted it again with different text, definitely real though. https://mobile.twitter.com/latimes/status/1633840062160072707 please include links when posting stuff like this

2
Gaterop 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol this looks almost identical to one of the cashier's at a grocery store near where I live

2
Gaterop 2 points ago +2 / -0

When you cannot argue or debate the content of what someone is saying you attack their character, standard operating procedure of any chronic liar.

2
Gaterop 2 points ago +3 / -1

Lol looks like you woke up a couple of downvoters with this. It looks like they've been lurking here for atleast an hour 🀣🀣🀣

13
Gaterop 13 points ago +13 / -0

For real, no need to spy or sabotage when our government will do it all for them.

8
Gaterop 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is from 2016, I bet that number has significantly increased with all the covid cash being thrown around

1
Gaterop 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looking at records here: https://worldpowerlifting.com/records/mens-world-records/ A 62KG Man can lift more than a 100KG+ Women. If they compete at the same weight a man can lift around 100KG more than a women. 100KG just so happens to be the difference between a 46KG women and a 100KG+ Women. Why even bother showing up to compete with such a massive difference? If there is more than one guy you wouldn't even be able to "compete" for 2nd or 3rd place, you would just automatically lose unless the dude doesn't actually lift which at a lifting competition is highly unlikely.

1
Gaterop 1 point ago +1 / -0

Whoever writes the writes the biggest check first.

2
Gaterop 2 points ago +2 / -0

Doubt they even consider someone "vaccinated" if it's only been 2 weeks. I wouldn't be surprised if only having 1 shot is considered not having it at all too.

5
Gaterop 5 points ago +5 / -0

Getting the government "back on our side" includes dismantling and getting rid of all those agencies, they will never come to heel, and by their very nature of having power with absolutely no oversight or accountability it doesn't matter who you put in, the result will eventually be a cesspool of corruption. You can't fix anything if you still have the FBI, CDC, ATF, DOJ, etc. around, they are the problem! What would even be the solution to fixing things but keeping a massive bureaucracy in place? Remove their ability to do anything I guess? But why even keep them around if you get rid of their ability to do anything? Just get rid of it! You need all the tyranny we live under to keep such a massive over reaching bureaucracy going.

7
Gaterop 7 points ago +7 / -0

Unless I'm mistaken this isn't actually his account, his Twitter account is just @KidRock even the word "official" is spelt wrong on this one. I remember people pointing this out the last time this account was posted

2
Gaterop 2 points ago +2 / -0

A better word for this type of so called "diversity" would actually be "conformity". They don't want actual diversity, they want a very strict conformity to an arbitrarily assigned gender or racial quota. When you follow a quota and only select people that meet a certain criteria, you automatically exclude everybody that doesn't conform to it, it's literally the exact opposite of diversity.

3
Gaterop 3 points ago +3 / -0

So he was hanging from a tree, and somehow after firing the gun but before dying he disposed of the gun so well that nobody can find it? Or was it the reverse? He shot himself in the chest, disposed of the gun, then found a tree to hang himself in before dying? Oh yeah, I totally buy that 🀑

1
Gaterop 1 point ago +1 / -0

All MSM outlets do this. I find it funny that they paid someone to design their site and include a comment section, just to then permanently disable it on every article once they realized people were calling them out on their BS.

5
Gaterop 5 points ago +5 / -0

Curious how in the statement put out by the Project Veritas board that they make claims about him spending donor money for frivolous personal expenses, yet they do not bother posting any actual receipts backing up this claim. Why not? If he is really doing these things, why not make public the info? Project Veritas' whole thing is that they cover corruption honestly and openly, so why is it here that they are not open with any type of info that could prove he did what they claim. https://www.projectveritas.com/news/statement-from-the-project-veritas-board-of-directors/ Is the statement I'm referring to. Ironically they say that overtime they will be transparent and release more info. Lolwut? What info could they possibly need time to gather? If he did these things as they claim and they have receipts such that they can prove it, just release them! It seems totally basic that the only reason they don't is that it doesn't exist!

2
Gaterop 2 points ago +2 / -0

So you link me to another one of your posts where you post the exact same photo. In other words you don't have any archive or any link to the completely different article on the left. They aren't edited man, it's 2 completely different articles! Archive even shows that the one you keep linking to has been the same for 6 years now! I'm not even commenting on anything related to Dravet Syndrome, merely that you seem to be completely fabricating the fact that WebMD edited their page. Outside of a dubious screenshot that doesn't show the URL whatsoever for the article on the left, which I've only been able to source from a website OTHER than WebMD, you have nothing to back this claim. You can go on and on about Dravet Syndrome, I'm not even talking about it, I'm talking about your claim that WebMD edited their page. All evidence points to you completely making this up. I don't even like WebMD, they are total frauds and give BS information that causes people with things like shoulder pain to believe they have terminal cancer. So I'm not supporting WebMD by any means. I am however questioning why you chose to post this dubious claim, how does it help anyone that might need to see this info if they look into it and find it's all BS?

Once again, do you have ANYTHING other than a screenshot for the article on the left of this image https://i.redd.it/qfrnb3bxiz711.png the original one you posted. Because, like I say, I can ONLY find this article with that exact text on a completely different website. Do you have an archive link? Or do you have the uncropped screenshot that shows a URL for the article on the left of the image? If not then this is an incredibly low effort post, I can put absolutely any text in a screenshot I want to. It seems totally obvious that the left image is a completely different article than the one on the right. The one on the right has an archive of that page dating back 6 years, IT HASNT CHANGED!!! The one on the left, like I said previously I can't even find on the WebMD website, so I've asked for a link, which you don't provide. As Joe Biden would say, Cmon man!

2
Gaterop 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hence why I am asking if you have an archive of the other page, a completely different article mind you then the one on the right. You can look at the archive and see the that the article on the right has been on their site for years and hasn't changed that entire time. That means the absolute best source you have is your word and screen shot, not exactly the greatest source on the planet. Dravet Syndrome being or not being a rabbit hole has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. You say the page was edited but your screenshot is of two different articles, the one on the left I could only find on a different website entirely, the one on the right, well I've already pointed out that archive shows it hasn't been edited. If you mean to say they have deleted a page entirely, that is different than editing an article to say something different. It doesn't mean I would condone doing such a thing, but you are claiming the article was edited and other than your screenshot which is of two completely different articles, the only sources I can find suggest this is not the case.

3
Gaterop 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is the only reason any politician or public figure brings up how Jewish they are, it's also the reason why they go out of their way to make a big show about converting if they weren't already pretending to be Jewish. They couldn't care less, they aren't religious in any way, in fact they loathe religion and think religious people are stupid, but holy shit if it isn't convenient as hell to call yourself a Jew so any and all criticism aimed towards you can be written off as "antisemitic"!

2
Gaterop 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wrong article! You are linking the right part of the image which is an article that hasn't changed since 2017, I want to see the one on the left! I literally linked an archive of that same page, I obviously know the URL for it.

Edit: I'm referring to the left part of the picture you posted https://i.redd.it/qfrnb3bxiz711.png

2
Gaterop 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can't find anything on WebMD for the left part of your screenshot, however I do find this: https://wa.kaiserpermanente.org/kbase/topic.jhtml?docId=nord377 which appears to have the same text though formatted slightly different, the image on the right appears to be a completely different article that has an archive from 2017 with the same text https://web.archive.org/web/20170624163910/https://www.webmd.com/epilepsy/what-is-dravet-syndrome

Not exactly a great source unless you happen to have an archive of a WebMD page showing the same text of the left part the image you posted, which would then be showing that they have deleted a page entirely, not edited one (obviously not suggesting this is any better, just you claim they edited the page when that appears to not be the case). You also link to two Twitter searches, not really sure what I'm supposed to be seeing there?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›