1
Hardcastle6 1 point ago +1 / -0

I remember there were rumors back in 2016 or so that the "hush money" payment was actually POTUS paying to help her somehow get clear of her NXVIM entanglement. Guess we may find out the truth soon enough...

1
Hardcastle6 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also, towards the end, he includes some potential ideas for those who are looking for ways to combat the coming "Prion Apocalypse" for both jabbed and unjabbed. Really good stuff imo...

3
Hardcastle6 3 points ago +6 / -3

They are gonna rig Colorado again. He wouldn't have won here anyway.

1
Hardcastle6 1 point ago +1 / -0

My thoughts are that the awakened (MAGA) crowd that has been supporting and paying to see the movie, are definitely NOT the type who would ever consider chipping themselves or their children. If it's a psyop, I think they are marketing it to the exactly wrong team for the desired outcome ie: chipping the children. The people raving about this movie are mostly the same ones who opposed the COVID mandates, vax etc. And mostly on our team.

I have seen others pushing that same theory along with the whole freemason thing. I suspect that the ones pushing that narrative are probably wittingly or unwittingly controlled opposition trying to steer people away from the movie. Or people inventing conspiracy theories because no one can believe anything anymore.

Bottom line for me is, the SOF is touching hearts in the right way, so I think it's a good thing no matter who is behind it or funding it...

Not everything is a psyop. The movie speaks for itself. I have seen nothing negative as a result of the movie yet, so I am judging it for the good message it conveys until there is evidence to the contrary.

A similar situation happened for me around 2018-2019 as President Trump was succeeding in his MAGA agenda, and even though I was skeptical of him at the time, his actions spoke for themselves. Suddenly, I started seeing all the stories about him being a secret Freemason/Manchurian candidate and other narratives aimed at dividing MAGA. But the truth was, he was doing good for America so he earned my respect by what he actually did. The results. For me, SOF is similar. I am really working on being able to tune out the noise and just observe the actual real impact of things with my own eyes.

Great points made by other frens here as well.

7
Hardcastle6 7 points ago +7 / -0

Q104:

Now is the time to pray. We're operational. God bless the United States of America. Q

3
Hardcastle6 3 points ago +3 / -0

I like U.S. Mint issued gold and silver eagles. Its funny to say, but I trust them more than anyone else for content and weight.

I usually start by going here:

https://findbullionprices.com/

Search what I am looking for, and if you click into the search results, it will show you a list of the more common dealers prices and what their premium is. Then you can decide who to buy from. I have bought numerous things from Apmex and JM and a few others as well. Never had any issues with anyone listed there though. I prefer Apmex if their premium isn't crazy out of whack. But that should help you get started hopefully.

2
Hardcastle6 2 points ago +2 / -0

Finally a real controversy! Lol, I grew up on Bryan Seltzer, I actually started duck tailing my hair with Dippidy Doo in the fifth grade because of Stray Cat Strut. He too (Seltzer) is a great guitar player, but I have to disagree, Brad Paisley is a SPECIAL guitar player. I hate his politics, but love his playing. I'm not really even a country guy, mainly grew up on EVH, Nuno and Yngwie, but still, Brad is really really good:

https://youtu.be/tHlmYlwUKHU

1
Hardcastle6 1 point ago +3 / -2

One of the great guitar players of our time. He was really good until he married into Hollywood. Too bad...

1
Hardcastle6 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is a good question. One thing I have been noticing is, there so far has been some distinction in reporting between either stating that the docs are "classified" as opposed to "marked classified"

I could be making more out of it then there really is, but I will be listening for that distinction and paying closer attention to who is saying it one way or the other as we get more light on it.

As with all of this intrigue, hard to tell if it's a keystone cop thing and all these guys are bumbling idiots or if there is more to it like some aspect of a devolution or CoG. Honestly, from my perspective, it's really hard to imagine a reality involving "devolution" but Trump has been involved with all these same players since at least his supposed Atlantic City informant days, so, who knows?

If by some crazy miracle our government has been devolved, then Pence would still be part of a devolved administration so he would have every reason to have classified information at his "devolved location"

Again, not saying I believe any of that, but that is another possible lense to view this all through.

I wouldn't trust many of these guys, but I will still take Chris Miller at his word that Pence is a Patriot.

6
Hardcastle6 6 points ago +6 / -0

Small point just for clarification of terminology in your post: many of the docs in question were reportedly classified/marked as "TS-SCI" at least in Biden and Trump's case (haven't heard details on Pence docs yet) but you describe them as "confidential" which is actually another lower level of classification way below TS. Not a big deal, but using correct terminology in this area is pretty critical. Your main point is well made though. One question I would ask regarding Pence situation is what level of clearance did his lawyers have when seeking and finding the docs for turning over. I suspect they also may have already been declassified by Trump so Pence knew they were able to access them without clearances. I may have missed some of those details in the reporting today though so I'm still not making a judgement until we know more.

1
Hardcastle6 1 point ago +1 / -0

" One unfounded claim making the rounds on social media..." Lol. These clowns...

1
Hardcastle6 1 point ago +1 / -0

Many of the Good Lion films are also available through the Burrow channel through a Roku device. Lots of other good stuff on Burrow. I just discovered it a week or so ago. There may be other ways to access Burrow, but Roku is the only way I know of currently.

4
Hardcastle6 4 points ago +4 / -0

IMHO, this may be the best proof yet. There have been some pretty convincing ones to date, but this one, damn!

1
Hardcastle6 1 point ago +1 / -0

Apologies, meant to include it was House/Trump/ Q related in title...

7
Hardcastle6 7 points ago +7 / -0

Absolutely. The craziest thing for me was that it seemed like everyone all the way up my chain suddenly stopped caring about regs or laws. I never experienced that phenomenon in my 26 years.

I was practically shouting from the rooftops the reg and my legal argument but nobody wanted any part of it. EVERYONE I knew in the Army just complied, no questions asked.

It was definitely a long, stressful last couple years on alone on my island. As of now, it looks like I will be allowed to retire (coincidentally another obscure reg I had to bring to the JAG's attention.)

3
Hardcastle6 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/1107?_gl=11dpqa8p_ga*UXV2NzR4aEl4Q0xIbkFWcVRLSHZoNzNnc3Fkd2UyTllLbVYwM0U5dkwwQ3JfYzRjSjMzcGFGR2FCSVcyd0hfLQ..

That is a link to the relevant section. I don't want to spam the board by copy/pasting the whole thing. But basically, the president must authorize it and SECDEF must follow notification requirements listed.

12
Hardcastle6 12 points ago +13 / -1

Hope I don't get too long winded here, and I apologize in advance if I get too far into the weeds in my input.

I do have personal experience with this, for what it's worth.

I started my career as enlisted in 1996. Went in to become an NCO (E7) and eventually went Warrant. I am still serving as a Warrant Officer.

I received all the previous stuff including several anthrax shots, smallpox etc in 2003 before deploying to Iraq.

As a Soldier, I NEVER thought in terms of "bodily autonomy" it was always about trusting my leadership, my fellow Soldiers and the Constitution and the great citizens of this country. My main focus was always about the mission and viewed my own personal safety as always secondary to the mission.

As an NCO, I was constantly pouring through regs and applicable laws in dealing with pretty much every issue that arose especially when it was related to one of my Soldiers. I always approached this task looking to best take care of my troop. Sometimes that wasn't possible, but my troops were my life.

In the military, there are virtually no possible issues that aren't covered by some, if not layers of regulations or laws already in existence.

This COVID mandate was NO different. It wasn't a new situation. In fact, immediately after hearing of a possibility of a mandate I began digging for applicable regs. I found them. I don't have them handy, but can provide the references if anyone wants it.

The situation with this mandate boiled down to the EUA status of the ACTUAL vaccines being administered vs. the theoretical "approved" Comirnaty that didn't exist. US Code requires the President and SECDEF to do certain things if they wish to require experimental medical treatment for Soldiers. THEY CAN require experimental vaccines, but need to follow the law. In this case, they did not do those things so their mandate was int legal (in my opinion).

I objected to the mandate on three grounds in my objection memo. First on religious, then medical and finally on the legal argument mentioned above. My religious and medical objections were both denied. I appealed the medical and was again denied. The legal argument I raised was never considered.

I received a GOMOR with threat of involuntary separation, submitted a rebuttal and was given some relief as my GOMOR was locally filed instead of my permanent personnel record.

So, I pretty much fought this fight as far as it could go. The military is very procedural and not a lot is open to interpretation by individuals.

I still believe that the mandate was not handled in a legal manner, because tptb we're trying to substitute the EUA version for the nonexistent "approved" version. It (in my opinion) was a grand slight of hand and at it's core, unlawful. I believe that is what Rep. Massey was talking about when he called it a "crime in progress"

Back to the bodily autonomy thing, I would argue that there is no such thing in the military. As I said, there are regs upon regs that govern everything but the bottom line for me was that while the military CAN require experimental vaccines etc. They must follow the law when implementing it which they did not (again, my opinion).

So, not sure who is correct in your argument, but hopefully that helps.

view more: Next ›