6
Humbled1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Also, while the jumps are interesting, the fact the votes are tracking identically afterwards is also something of note. How would random votes sample 50/50 that much?

Almost like it was designed to keep a percentage above every drop, regardless of their influx of fakes.

2
Humbled1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just seemed interesting to me, considering everything Trump did, we knew well in advance. With Biden, it doesn't get the same attention.

Not Q related, that I know of.

1
Humbled1 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm pretty sure a strong number of those troops over seas are just fine with him staying here. I would be.

1
Humbled1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, but do a quick Google... CNN, Fox, MSNBC... None of their landing pages had mention at the time. Only the local affiliates are carrying it.

1
Humbled1 1 point ago +1 / -0

I only know about this, because a close friend of the family has been invited to attend and he wasn't in a position to refuse.

2
Humbled1 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is kind of a shame, vax didn't work as she was told it would. And it didn't work the way we've come to learn it works. Oh well, maybe her next booster will my the magic one.

7
Humbled1 7 points ago +7 / -0

Personally, I feel they don't want the route loaded with FJB signs and MAGA supporters.

3
Humbled1 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't agree with all your points, but I do agree, Elon wears no hat. He's not fighting for a side, just for the things he aligns with.

2
Humbled1 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree with your take on it. Trump posting will cause a massive spike in activity.

6
Humbled1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Considering Schiffty said they had plenty of evidence against him, NO....

They ain got shit!

6
Humbled1 6 points ago +6 / -0

Fucking hell...LOL!!!...Scared my dog, reading that one!!

4
Humbled1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah....not gonna happen. Been on here for a bit. Most things hit the board 5 at a time or more.

The only thing that ever gets me, is when a standard member posts something then 1hr later a mod posts the same thing, different link or wording, and the mod's post gets stickied. Oh well, everything can seem "political" at times

2
Humbled1 2 points ago +2 / -0

He can run for President of "Deez Nuts"... He's still gonna get tea bagged....

3
Humbled1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Civilian uprising in "T minus 10, 9, 8, 7..."

3
Humbled1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Guess I'm double f-ked... I voted for Obama his first run..... I thought he could bring some change... Only thing I saw change was the media go from saying he was only partially black to he was our "first black president". Immediately felt duped and swapped party's then, seeing the media backing democrat virtue signaling.

I voted R in 2012 and was planning to vote R in 2016. Very happy I voted TRUMP, instead!!!

1
Humbled1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Xi seems to be experiencing that moment, when you realize there is a dirty diaper near by....

2
Humbled1 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't "trust" any of the media sources out there. I do like to know what BS they are spewing next though.

That said, I do enjoy some Gutfeld from time to time.

1
Humbled1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Naw, seriously just as I stated. I read the comment and had not seen the angle approached on here and was curious everybody's take on it.

I was honestly hoping for open communication to both sides of it, but really only got 'youre a fool, go sit in the corner'.

2
Humbled1 2 points ago +2 / -0

I tried finding it but could not. But I recall when WikiLeaks exposed Clinton's emails, there was 1 specific one that basically said " the voters are dumb and need us to show them how to vote" or something along those lines.

That ring a bell to any on here? Was it debunked?

2
Humbled1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Conundrum? No. Topic not discussed on here, yes.

I don't disagree with you.

I do feel it's worth considering because MSM is going to sell (already is selling) Desantis as the future of the party.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›